Objective: To examine differences between light and heavier smoking vocational/technical students in tobacco use, related behaviors, and cessation.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Setting and Methods: Two hundred and four smokers attending two vocational/technical colleges in east Texas, USA, completed an anonymous survey during a regularly scheduled class in Fall, 2004 or Spring, 2005.
Results: Heavier smokers (39.7 per cent of the sample) were more likely than light smokers to be European American, to be dependent on cigarettes, to use cigarettes in a variety of situations, to use medication to quit smoking, and to be less likely to report a desire to quit on their own. The two groups did not differ on gender or the use of cigars and chewing tobacco.
Conclusion: Given the disproportionately high rates of tobacco use among vocational/technical students, results from this study indicate that salient anti-tobacco programs that can be implemented at the vocational school and that target light and heavier smoking students are needed.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 2007. MMWR, 2007: 56: 1157–61.
2.
LoukasAMurphyJLGottliebNH. Cigarette smoking and cessation among trade/technical school students in Texas. Journal of American College Health, 2008: 56: 401–7.
3.
RigottiNALeeJEWechslerH. US college students’ use of tobacco products: Results of a national survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2000: 284: 699–705.
4.
HajekPWestRWilsonJ. Regular smokers, lifetime very light smokers, and reduced smokers: Comparison of psychosocial and smoking characteristics in women. Health Psychol, 1995: 14: 195–201.
OkuyemiKAhluwaliaJRichterK. Differences among African American light, moderate, and heavy smokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 2001: 3: 45–50.
7.
KillenJFortmanSTelchM. Are heavy smokers different from light smokers? A comparison after 48 hours without cigarettes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1988: 260: 1581–5.
8.
BjartveitBTverdalA. Health consequences of smoking 1–4 cigarettes per day. Tobacco Control, 2005: 14: 315–20.
9.
WilsonDTaylorARobertsL. Can we target smoking groups more effectively? A study of males and females heavy smokers. Preventive Medicine, 1995: 24: 363–8.
10.
ZhuSSunJHawkinsS. A population study of low-rate smokers: Quitting history and instability over time. Health Psychology, 2003: 22: 245–52.
ShiffmanSKasselJPatyJ. Smoking typology profiles of chippers and regular smokers. Journal of Substance Abuse, 1994: 9: 21–35.
13.
BarbeauEKriegerNSoobaderM. Working class matters: Socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. American Journal of Health Behavior, 2004: 94: 269–78.
HinesDFretzACNollenNL. Regular and occasional smoking by college students: Personality attributions of smokers and non-smokers. Psychological Reports, 1998: 83: 1299–306.
16.
WetterDWFioreMJorenbyDE. Gender differences in smoking cessation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1999: 67: 555–62.
17.
DeBernardoRAldingerCDawoodO. An e-mail assessment of undergraduates’ attitudes toward smoking. Journal of American College Health, 1999: 48: 51–4.
18.
RyanB. Prevention challenges at community colleges. US Department of Education. Washington, DC: Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention, 1998.
19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State smoking restrictions for private-sector worksites, restaurants, and bars - United States, 1998 and 2004. MMWR, 2005: 54: 649–53.
20.
GottliebNWeinsteinRBaunW. A profile of health risks among blue-collar workers. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1992: 34: 61–8.
