Objective To systematically review definitions and descriptions of computer literacy as related to preventive health education programs.
Method A systematic review of the concept of computer literacy as related to preventive health education was conducted. Empirical studies published between 1994 and 2007 on prevention education programs with a computer literacy component were found using medical/health, communication, information science and education databases.
Results A total of 464 citations were retrieved from 12 databases using specific search terms. Six articles met the inclusion criteria of: search terms in title, abstract and/or key words; peer-reviewed; original empirical research; and written in English.
Conclusion Findings show limited and inconsistent definitions of computer literacy in the literature on computer-based prevention interventions. Without a clear construct of computer literacy, it will be difficult to determine the impact of such programs on health information seeking and, ultimately, health status.
United States Census Bureau.Computer and Internet use in the United States: 2003. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/computer.html
2.
Fox S.Are ‘wired seniors’ sitting ducks? Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/180/report_display.asp
3.
Horrigan J.The Internet as a resource for news and information about science . Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/191/report_display.asp
4.
Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine , 2005; 165(22): 2618-24.
5.
Spooner T., Rainie L.African-Americans and the Internet. Retrieved November 1, 2007 , from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/25/report_display.asp
6.
Fox S., Livingston G. Latinos online. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/204/report_display.asp
7.
Birru M., Steinman RAOnline health information and low-literacy African Americans. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2004; 6(3): e26.
8.
Norman CD, Skinner HAeHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2006; 8(4): e27.
9.
Poynton TAComputer literacy across the lifespan: a review with implications for educators . Computers in Human Behavior, 2004; 21: 861-72.
10.
Fox S.Online health search 2006. Retrieved November 1, 2007 , from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/190/report_display.asp
11.
Bright MA, Fleisher L., Thomsen C., Morra ME, Marcus A., Gehring W.Exploring e-Health usage and interest among cancer information service users: the need for personalized interactions and multiple channels remains . Journal of Health Communication, 2005; 10(Suppl 1): 35-52.
12.
LaCoursiere SP , Knobf MT, McCorkle R.Cancer patients’ self-reported attitudes about the Internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2005; 7(3): e22.
13.
Fogel J., Albert SM, Schnabel F., Ditkoff BA, Neugut AIRacial/ethnic differences and potential psychological benefits in use of the internet by women with breast cancer. Psychooncology , 2003; 12(2): 107-17.
14.
Cruz-Correia R., Fonseca J., Lima L., et al. Web-based or paper-based self-management tools for asthma--patients’ opinions and quality of data in a randomized crossover study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 2007; 127: 178-89.
15.
Berry DL, Wolpin SE, Lober WB, Ellis WJ, Russell KJ, Davison BJActual use and perceived usefulness of a web-based, decision support program for men with prostate cancer. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2006; 122: 781-2.
16.
Gerber BS, Solomon MC, Shaffer TL, Quinn MT, Lipton RBEvaluation of an internet diabetes self-management training program for adolescents and young adults. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics, 2007; 9(1): 60-7.
17.
Gerber BS, Brodsky IG, Lawless KA, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28(7): 1574-80.
18.
Thomson MD, Hoffman-Goetz L.Readability and cultural sensitivity of web-based patient decision aids for cancer screening and treatment: a systematic review. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 2007; 32(4): 263-86.
19.
Tsai MJDo male and female students often perform better than female students when learning computers? A study of Taiwanese eight graders’ computer education through strategic and cooperative learning. Journal of Educational and Computing Research, 2002; 26(1): 67-85.
20.
Webster’s New World™ Dictionary of the American Language.Definition: Literacy. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984.
21.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition). Definition: Literacy . Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www.bartleby.com/61/87/L0198700.html
22.
Paisley WJScientific literacy and the competition for public attention and understanding . Science Communication, 1998; 20(1): 70-80.
23.
Nutbeam D.Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 2000; 15: 259-67.
24.
Kutner M., Greenberg E., Jin Y., Paulsen C.The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics , 2006.
25.
Friedman DB , Hoffman-Goetz L.A systematic review of literacy and health literacy definitions for cancer education programs. Health Education Journal, 2008; 67(3): 285-304.
26.
Zarcadoolas C., Pleasant AF, Greer D.Advancing Health Literacy. A Framework for Understanding and Action . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass ; 2006.
27.
Breslow RA, Ross SA, Weed DLQuality of reviews in epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 1998; 88(3): 475-7.
28.
Friedman DB , Hoffman-Goetz L.A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education and Behavior, 2006; 33(3): 352-73.
29.
Oxman AD, Guyatt GHThe science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993; 703: 125-33.
30.
Nicholas D. , Huntington P., Williams P.Delivering consumer health information digitally: A comparison between the Web and touchscreen kiosk. Journal of Medical Systems, 2003; 27(1): 13-34.
31.
Hansen DL, Derry HA, Resnick PJ, Richardson CRAdolescents searching for health information on the Internet: An observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2003; 5(4): e25.
32.
Thumboo J., Wee HL, Cheung YB, Machin D., Luo N., Fong KYDevelopment of a Smiling Touchscreen multimedia program for HRQoL assessment in subjects with varying levels of literacy. Value in Health , 2006; 9(5): 312-19.
33.
Oenema A., Brug J., Lechner L.Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Education Research, 2001; 16(6): 647-60.
34.
Sweeney MA, Chiriboga DAEvaluating the effectiveness of a multimedia program on home safety . The Gerontologist, 2003; 43(3): 325-34.
35.
Masucci MM, Homko C., Santamore WP, et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention for underserved patients using the Internet: bridging the digital divide. Telemedicine and e-Health, 2006; 12(1): 58-65.
36.
Viswanath K. , Kreuter MWHealth disparities, communication inequalities, and eHealth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007; 32(5 Suppl): S131-3.
37.
Cline RJ, Haynes KMConsumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art . Health Education Research, 2001 ; 16(6): 671-92.
38.
Griffiths F. , Lindenmeyer A., Powell J., Lowe P., Thorogood M.Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 2006; 8(2): e10.
39.
Saranto K., Hovenga EJS.Information literacy - what it is about? Literature review of the concept and the context. International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2004; 73: 503-13.
40.
Oh H., Rizo C., Enkin M., Jadad A.What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions . Journal of Internet Medical Research, 2005; 7(1): e1.
41.
Hesse BW, Shneiderman B.eHealth research from the user’s perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007; 32(5 Suppl): S97-103.
