Objective To document the lifestyle health impacts (activity, diet and physiological), along with the operational success and challenges, of a programme for families presenting one or more coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factor.
Design Data are based on a wider evaluation of a government-funded community initiative conducted in a deprived area of Liverpool (UK) between September 2004 and January 2006.
Setting Data are based on readings and responses taken by programme staff, and Liverpool John Moores University evaluation exercises held within May Logan Healthy Living Centre.
Method Lifestyle behaviour changes, monitored at weeks 1, 7 and 14 and at 6 months, for 34 families were analysed. Further exploration of programme success and challenges was through focus groups with families and interviews with staff.
Results Sustained changes in activity and diet support the viability of a short and supportive programme in reducing CHD risks. Physiological change was less positive, suggesting limited improvement in this domain. Personal, environmental and cultural factors presented as a challenge to programme success.
Sturgis P., Thomas R., Purdon S., Bridgwood A., Dodd T.Comparative Review and Assessment of Key Health State Measures of the General Population (pp. 1-130). London: Department of Health, 2001.
2.
Department of Health. Choosing Health. Publications and Policy Guidelines . London: The Stationary Office , 2004.
3.
Summary of Local Delivery Plan. A Vision for the Improvement of Health Services in South Sefton (2003-2006). South Sefton: South Sefton Primary Care Trust (NHS) , 2003. Online. Available at: http://www.southseftonpct.nhs.uk/Publications/LocalDeliveryPlan.pdf (accessed 14 January 2006 ).
4.
Kahn E., Ramsey L., Brownson R., Heath G., Howze E., Powell K., Stone E., Rajab M., Corso P.The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: A systemic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002: 22: S73-92.
5.
Maddock J.Evaluation of community-based physical activity programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2006: 29: 240-1.
6.
Borra S., Kelly L., Shirreffs M., Neville K., Geiger G.Developing health messages: Qualitative studies with children, parents, and teachers help identify communications opportunities for healthful lifestyles and prevention of obesity. Journal of American Dietetic Association , 2003: 103: 721-8.
7.
Kubik M., Lytle L., Fulkerson J.Fruits, vegetables, and football: Findings from focus groups with alternative high school students regarding eating and physical activity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2005: 36: 494-500.
8.
Shepherd J., Harden A., Rees A., Brunton G., Garcia G., Oliver S., Oakley A.Young people and healthy eating: A systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health Education Research, 2005: 21: 239-57.
9.
Stucky-Ropp R., DiLorenzo T.Determinants of physical exercise in children . Preventive Medicine, 1993: 22: 880-9.
10.
Titze S., Stronegger W., Owen N.Prospective study of individual, social and environmental predictors of physical activity: Women leisure running. Psychology of Sport and Exercise , 2004: 6: 363-76.
11.
Prochaska JO , Diclemente CC, Norcross JCIn search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviours. American Psychologist, 1992: 47: 1102-14.
12.
Adams J., White M.Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work? Health Education Research, 2005: 20: 237-43.
13.
Kircaldy A., Robinson J., Barr W.The Liverpool and Sefton Lifestyle Survey. September Report No.94/03. Liverpool: Health and Community Care Research Unit , 2003. Online. Available at: http://www.liv.ac.uk/haccru/reports/Liverpool_and_South_Sefton_Lifestyle_Survey.pdf (accessed June 2007).
14.
Sport England.Young People and Sport in England 1999. A Survey of Young People and PE Teachers. London: Sport England, 2001.
15.
Greene GW, Rossi SR, Reed R., Willey C., Proschaska JOStages of change for reducing fat intake to 30% of energy or less. Journal of American Dietetic Association, 1994: 94: 1105-10.
16.
Brug J., Glanz K., Kok G.The relationship between self-efficacy, attitudes, intake compared to others, consumption and change related to fruit and vegetables. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1997: 12: 25-30.
17.
Department of Heath.At Least Five a Week: Evidence of the Impact of Physical Activity and its Relationship to Heath. A Report from the Chief Medical Officer. London: Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Prevention , 2004.
18.
Englert H., Diehl H., Greenlaw R.Rationale and design of the Rockford CHIP, a community based coronary risk reduction programme: Results of a pilot phase. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2004: 38: 432-41.
19.
Gordon N., Salmon R., Franklin B., Sperling L., Hall L., Leighton R., Haskell W.Effectiveness of therapeutic lifestyle changes in patients with hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and/or hyperglycaemia. American Journal of Cardiology, 2004: 94: 1558-61.
20.
Shapiro J., Stout A., Musante G.`Structure-size me': Weight and health changes in a four week residential programme. Eating Behaviours, 2005: 7: 229-34.
21.
Lawler DA, Keen S., Neal RDIncreasing population levels of physical activity through primary care: GP's knowledge, attitudes and self-reported practice. Family Practice , 1999: 16: 250-4.
22.
Rosal M., Ockene J., Luckmann R., Zapka J., Goins K., Saperia G., Mason T., Donnelly G.Coronary heart disease multiple risk factor reduction: Providers' perspectives . American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2004: 27: 54-60.
23.
Department of Health.5 A Day Portion Information. London: Department of Health, 2003.
24.
Department of Health.National School Fruit Scheme. London: Department of Health, 2002.
25.
Dixon H., Borland R., Segan C., Stafford H., Sindhall C.Public reaction to Victoria's `2 fruit "n" 5 veg every day' campaign and reported consumption of fruit and vegetables. Preventive Medicine, 1998: 27: 572-82.
26.
Reger B., Wootan M., Booth-Butterfield S.A comparison of different approaches to promote community-wide dietary change . Preventive Medicine, 2000: 18: 271-5.
27.
Lechner L., Brug J., De Vries H., van Assema P., Mudde A.Stages of change for fruit, vegetable and fat intake: Consequences and misperception . Health Education Research, Theory and Practice, 1998: 13: 1-11.
28.
Fitzgibbon M., Stolley M., Dyer A., VanHorn L., Kaufer Christoffel K.A community based obesity prevention programme for minority children: Rationale and study design for hip-hop to health Jr.American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 2002: 34: 289-97.
29.
Riebe D., Blissmer B., Greene G., Caldwell M., Ruggerio L., Stillwell K., Nigg C.Long-term maintenance of exercise and healthy eating behaviours in overweight adults. Preventive Medicine, 2005: 40: 769-78.
30.
Frisby W., Crawford S., Dorer T.Reflections on participatory action research: The case of low income women accessing local physical activity services. Journal of Sport Management, 1997: 11: 8-28.
31.
Bunton R., Baldwin S., Flynn D., Whitelaw S.The `stages of change' model in health promotion: Science and ideology. Critical Public Health, 2000: 10: 55-70.
32.
Kay A.Art and community development: The role the arts have in regenerating communities . Community Development Journal, 2000: 35(4): 414-24.
33.
Schuit AJ, Wendel-Vos GC, Verschuren WM, Ronckers ET, Ament A., Van Assema P., Van Ree J., Ruland ECEffect of 5-year community intervention Hartslag Limburg on cardiovascular risk factors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006: 30: 237-42.
