Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2005-12
Promoting physical activity amongst children outside of physical education classes: A systematic review integrating intervention studies and qualitative studies
Objective To assess what is known about the barriers to, and facilitators of, physical activity outside the physical education (PE) lesson amongst children aged four to ten years.
Design Systematic review of intervention studies assessing impact on health outcomes and studies evaluating the 'views' of children and parents on what helps and hinders children in being physically active.
Mcthods Studies were located by searching multiple sources. Those meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality. Intervention and views studies were analysed separately; then their results were brought together to examine matches, mismatches and gaps between children's and parents' views and intervention strategies.
Results Of 90 identified studies, 26 met the inclusion criteria: 21 intervention studies (of which five were sound) and five 'views' studies. Education and equipment provision for monitoring TV/video/video game use and multi-component interventions are promising approaches. In the views studies, children and parents identified several barriers and facilitators, and made suggestions for improving participation levels. There were important matches and mismatches between what children say influences their physical activity participation and the barriers and facilitators addressed in five soundly evaluated interventions. A major gap was the lack of soundly evaluated interventions addressing the barriers in children's local environments.
Conclusion Children's and parents' clear views on what helps and hinders children's participation in physical activity rarely informed the development of interventions. Few well-evaluated health promotion interventions address physical activity beyond the PE lesson. Gaps between children's views and soundly evaluated interventions were most noticeable in relation to issues of restricted access to opportunities for physical activity.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.The Prevention and Treatment of Childhood Obesity, 7, 1-11. Effective Health Care bulletin. York, UK: NHS CRD, 2002. Accessed at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/ehc76.pdf.
2.
Gregory J., Lowe S., Bates CJ, Prentice A., Jackson LV, Smithers G. et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey of Young People aged 4-18 years: Volume 1: Report of the diet and nutrition survey. London: The Stationery Office, 2000 .
3.
Biddle Sjh, Cavill N., Sallis JFHealth enhancing physical activity for young people: Statement of the United Kingdom Expert Consensus Conference. Pediatric Exercise Science , 2001: 13: 12-25.
4.
Department of Health for England.Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation. London: The Stationery Office, 1999.
5.
Department of Health for England.Our Healthier Nation. London: The Stationery Office , 1998.
6.
NHS Wales.Improving Health in Wales: A Plan for the NHS with its Partners. Cardiff, Wales: National Assembly for Wales, 2001.
7.
NHS Scotland.Our National Health: A Plan for Action, a Plan for Change. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive, 2000.
8.
Brannen J., Dodd K, Oakley A, Storey P. Young People, Health and Family Life. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1994.
9.
Moore H., Kindness L.Establishing a research agenda for the health and well being of children and young people in the context of health promotion. In: H Moore (Ed), Promoting the Health of Children and Young People: Settliig a Research Agenda, 1-17. London, UK: Health Education Authority, 1998.
10.
Shucksmith J., Hendry L. HealthIssues and Adolescents: Growing Up and Speaking Out. London, UK: Routledge, 1998.
11.
Peersman G., Oakley A., Oliver S., Thomas J.Review of Effectiveness of Sexual Health Promotions Intervention for Young People (updated). London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 1996.
12.
UK National Screening Committee.Glossary for UK National Screening Programmes. UK National Screening Committee website: http://www.nsc.nhs.uk/uk_nsc/uk_nsc_main.htm . National Health Service, accessed July 2004.
13.
Fulton JE, McGuire MT, Caspersen CJ, Dietz WHInterventions for weight loss and weight gain prevention among youth: Current issues. Sports Medicine, 2001: 31(3): 153-165.
14.
Keays JJ, Allison KRThe effects of regular moderate to vigorous physical activity on student outcomes: A review. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 1995: 86(1): 62-65.
15.
Fender NJMotivation for physical activity among children and adolescents. Annual Revue ofNursing Research, 1998: 16: 139-712.
16.
Resnicow K. , Robinson TNSchool-based cardiovascular disease prevention studies: Review and synthesis. Annals of Epidemiology, 1997: 7(Suppl): S14-S31.
17.
Sallis JF, Prochaska J.J., Taylor WCA review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2000: 32(5): 963-975.
18.
Stone EJ, McKenzie TL, Welk GJ, Booth MLEffects of physical activity interventions in youth: Review and synthesis . American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998: 15(4): 298-315.
19.
Thomas J., Sutcliffe K., Harden A., Oakley A., Oliver S., Rees R. et al. Children and Healthy Eating: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2003 .
20.
Rees R., Kavanagh J., Burchett H., Shepherd J., Brunton G., Harden A. et al. Hiv HealthPromotion and Men who have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review of Research relevant to the Development and Implementation of Effective and Appropriate Interventions. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2004.
21.
Shepherd J., Harden A., Rees R., Brunton G., Garcia J., Oliver S. et al. YoungPeople and Healthy Eating: A Systematic Review of Research on Barriers and Facilitators. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2001 .
22.
Harden A., Rees R., Shepherd J., Brunton G, Oliver S, Oakley A. Young People and Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Research on Barriers and Facilitators. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2001.
23.
Rees R., Harden A., Shepherd J., Brunton G, Oliver S, Oakley A. Young People and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Research on Barriers and Facilitators. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2001.
24.
Thomas J., Harden A., Oakley A., Oliver S., Sutcliffe K., Rees R. et al. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: An example from public health. Britislz Medical Journal, 2004: 328: 1010-1012.
25.
Harden A., Garcia J., Oliver S., Rees R., Shepherd J., Brunton G. et al. Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: An example from public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004: 58: 794-800.
26.
Harden A., Weston R., Oakley A.A Revielw of the Effectiveness and Appropriateness of Peer-delivered Health Promotion for Young People. London, UK: EPPI -Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London , 1999.
27.
Peersman G., Oliver S., Oakley A.EPPI-Centre Review Guidelines: Data Collections for the EPIC Database. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 1997.
28.
Harden A., Rees R., Oliver S., Brunton G., Thomas J., Oakley A.Health Promotion Views Data Extraction Guidelines 2002. Version 0.1. London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2002.
29.
Oliver S., Harden A., Rees R., Shepherd J., Brunton G., Garcia J. et al. An Emerging Framework for Integrating Different Types of Evidence in Systematic Reviews for Public Policy: Evaluation. In press.
30.
Ford BS, McDonald TE, Owens AS, Robinson TNPrimary care interventions to reduce television viewing in African-American children. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002: 22(2): 106-109.
31.
Gortmaker SL , Cheung LW, Peterson KE, Chomitz G., Cradle JH, Dart H. et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: Eat well and keep moving. Archives of Pediatrics & AdolescentMedicine, 1999: 153(9): 975-983.
32.
Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, Nader PR, Parcel GS, Stone EJ et al. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Journal of the American Medical Association, 1996: 275(10): 768-776.
33.
Walter HJ, Hofman A., Vaughan RD, Wynder ELModification of risk factors for coronary heart disease: Five-year results of a school-based intervention trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988: 318(17): 1093-1100.
34.
Robinson TNReducing children's television viewing to prevent obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1999: 282(16): 1561-1567.
35.
Mott DS, Virgilio SJ, Warren BL, Berenson GSEffectiveness of a personalized fitness module on knowledge, attitude, and cardiovascular endurance of fifth-grade students: 'Heart smart'. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1991: 73(3 Pt 1): 847-858.
36.
Burrows C.Children's perceptions of exercise - are children mini-adults?Health Education, 1999: 2: 61-69.
37.
Davis A., Jones L.Environmental constraints on health: Listening to children's views. Health Education Journal, 1996: 55(4): 363-374.
38.
Mason V Young People and Sport in England, 1994: The Views of Teachers and Children. London, UK: Sports Council, 1995 .
39.
Mulvihill C.A qualitative study investigating the views of primary-age children and parents on physical activityHealth Education Journal, 2000: 59: 166-179.
40.
Tuxworth B.The St Edmmdsbury Fitness Survey 1993-1995. St Edmundsbury , UK: St Edmundsbury Council, 1997 .
41.
Smolak L.A controlled evaluation of an elementary school primary prevention program for eating problems. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1998:44(3-4): 339-353.
42.
Ernst MP, Pangrazi RPEffects of a physical activity program on children's activity levels and attraction to physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 1999: 11(4): 393-405.
43.
Baranowski T., Simons-Morton B., Hooks P., Henske J., Tiernan K., Dunn JK et al. A center-based program for exercise change among Black-American families. Health Education Quarteuly , 1990: 17(2): 179-196.
44.
Davis SMLLG. Southwest Cardiovascular Curriculum Project: Study findings for American Indian elementary students. Journal of Health Education, 1995: 26(2) Supplement: S72-S81.
45.
Abbott J.A health-related exercise project in primary schools. Education and Health, 1989: 7(8): 33-37.
46.
Walter HJPrimary prevention of chronic disease among children: The school-based 'Know Your Body' intervention trials. Health Education Quarterly , 1989: 16(2): 201-214.
47.
Zonderland ML EWK. Additional physical education and plasma lipids and apoproteins: A 3-year intervention study. Pediatric Exercise Science, 1994: 6: 128-139.
48.
Sahota P., Rudolf MC, Dixey R., Hill AJ, Barth JH, Cade J.Randomised controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity. British Medical Journal, 2001: 323(7230): 1029-1032.
49.
Stratton G.Promoting children's physical activity in primary school: An intervention study using playground markings. Ergonomics, 2000: 43(10): 1538-1546.
50.
Balding A.Fit to Succeed: A Partnership between the children of Exeter, Exeter Academic Council, Exeter City Council, Devon Curriculum Services, the Schools Health Education Unit and DC Leisure Management, to promote physical activity and achievement in schools. Exeter, UK: Exeter City Council, 2000.
