Baldwin, A. Y., Gear, G. H.,& Lucito, L. J. (Eds.). Educotionol planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1978.
2.
Baldwin, A.Y., & Wooster, J.Baldwin identification matrix inservice kit for the identification of gifted and talented students. Buffalo, NY: D.O.K. Publishers, 1977.
3.
Barron, F.Creativity and psychological health. Princeton : Van Nostrand, 1963.
4.
Guilford, J.P.Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 469-79.
5.
Harmon, L.R.The development of a criterion of scientific competence. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. NYC: John Wiley & Sons, 1963,44-52.
6.
Helson, R.Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 36, 210-20.
7.
Helson, R., & Crutchfield, R. S. Mathematicians: The creative researcher and the average Ph.D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 1970, 34, 250-57.
8.
Hoyt, D.P.The relationship between college grades and adult achievement: A review of the literature. Iowa City: American College Testing Program Research Report No. 7, 1965.
9.
Jarecky, R.K.Identification of the socially gifted. Exceptional Children , 1959,25, 415-419.
10.
Karnes, F.A., & Collins, E.C.State definitions on the gifted and talented: A report and analysis . Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1978, 1, 44-61.
11.
MacKinnon, D.W.Selecting students with creative potential. In P. Heist (Ed.), The creative college student: An unmet challenge . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968, 101-116.
12.
Marland, S.P.Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education and background papers submitted to theU. S. Office of Education. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
13.
Marston, A.R.It is time to reconsider the Graduate Record Examination. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 653-56.
14.
McClelland, D.C.Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence." American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 1-14.
15.
Munday, L.A., & Davis, J.C.Varieties of accomplishment after college: Perspectives on the meaning of academic talent. Iowa City: American College Testing Program Research Report No. 62, 1974.
16.
Renzulli, J.S.Talent potential in minority group students. Exceptional Children , 1971, 39, 437-444.
17.
Renzulli, J.S., Reis, S.M., & Smith, L.M., The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, 1981.
18.
Terman, L.M.Psychological approaches to the biography of genius. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1970.
19.
Terman, L.M.The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. In W. B. Barbe & J. S. Renzulli (Eds.), Psychology and Education of the Gifted, NYC: Halsted Press, 1975, 6-20.
20.
Torrance, E.P.Discovery and nurturance of giftedness in the culturally different . Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.
21.
Wallach, M.Tests tell us little about talent. American Scientist , 1976, 64, 57-63.
22.
Witty, P.A.Who are the gifted? In N. B. Henry (Ed.), The fifty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, Education of the Gifted. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1958 .
