Bernal, E. ( 2003). To no longer educate the gifted: Programming for gifted students beyond the era of inclusionism. Gifted Child Quarterly , 47, 183-191.
2.
Clinkenbeard, P.R., Kolloff, P.B., & Lord, E.W. ( 2007). A guide to state policies in gifted education (CD-ROM) . Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
Johnsen, S.K., VanTassel-Baska, J. & Robinson, A. ( 2008). Using the national gifted education standards for university teacher preparation program.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
Kitano, M., Montgomery, D., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S.K. ( 2008). Using the national gifted education standards for Pre-K-12 professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
6.
Landrum, M. S., Callahan, C. M., & Shaklee, B. (Eds.). (2000). Aiming for excellence: Annotations to the NAGC Pre-K-12 gifted program standards. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
7.
Loveless, T. ( 2008). An analysis of NAEP data, In High-achieving students in the era of NCLB (pp. 13-48). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
8.
Moon, T.R., Callahan, C.M., Tomlinson, C.A., & Miller, E.M. ( 2002). Middle school classrooms: Teachers’ reported practices and student perceptions (RM 02164). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut .
9.
Moon, T.R., Tomlinson, C.A., & Callahan, C.M. (1995). Academic diversity in the middle school: Results of a national survey of middle school administrators and teachers (RM 95124). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut .
10.
Purcell, J.E. ( 1993). The effects of the elimination of gifted and talented programs on participating students and their parents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 177-187.
11.
Robinson, A. & Moon, S.M. ( 2003). The national study of state and local advocacy in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 8-25.
12.
Robinson, A., Shore, B.M., & Enersen, D.L. ( 2007). Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press .
13.
Scot, T.P., Callahan, C.M., & Urquhart, J. ( 2009). Paint-by-number teachers and cookie-cutter students: The unintended effects of high-stakes testing on the education of gifted students . Roeper Review, 31, 40-52.
14.
Shore, B.M., Cornell, D.G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V.S. ( 1991). Recommended practices in gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Starko, A. ( 1990). Life and death of a gifted program: Lessons not yet learned . Roeper Review, 13, 33-38.
16.
VanTassel-Baska, J. ( 2006). A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs: A clarion call for enhanced gifted program development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 199-213.
17.
VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. ( 2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44, 211-217.
18.
Ward, M. ( 1982). The "ostrich syndrome": Do gifted programs cure sick regular programs? Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 34-36.
19.
Westberg, K., Archambault, F., Dobyns, S., & Salvin, T. ( 1993). The classroom practices observational study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.
20.
Westberg, K., & Daoust, M.E. ( 2004). The results of the replication of the classroom practices survey in two states. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
21.
Wyner, J.S., Bridgeland, J.M., & Diiulio, J.J., Jr. (2007). The achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families . Retrieved February 1, 2009 from http://www.jkcf.org/assets/files/0000/0084/Achievement_Trap.pdf
