Whereas perspectives on giftedness have included motivation as a construct related to giftedness, the proposed conceptualization advances a new view that motivation is an area of giftedness in and of itself. Academic intrinsic motivation (i.e., enjoyment of school learning) is the domain focused upon in this conceptualization inasmuch as it has inherent ties to cognition, gifted intellect, and achievement. Research supports the following criteria, advanced as a beginning effort toward the development of a conceptualization of a gifted motivation construct: (a) significantly higher academic intrinsic motivation is evidenced by intellectually gifted compared to their comparison cohort; (b) academic intrinsic motivation is significantly, positively, and uniquely related to academic achievement above and beyond IQ; (c) academic intrinsic motivation evidences substantial continuity from childhood through adolescence; and (d) environment is significantly related to academic intrinsic motivation. The construct of gifted motivation serves heuristic purposes to advance further inquiry and also has implications regarding the development and implementation of giftedness programs. Suggestions are made regarding research needed for further development of a gifted motivation construct.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Teacher’s Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
3.
Asendorpf, J. B. (1992). Continuity and stability of personality traits and personality patterns. In J. B. Asendorpt & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Stability and change in development: A study of methodological reasoning (pp. 116-142). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Bayley, N. (1969). Bayley scales of infant development. New York: Psychological Corporation.
5.
Bradley, R. H., Caldwell, B. M., Rock, S. L., Hamrick, H. M., & Harris, P. (1988). Home observation for measurement of the environment: Development of a home inventory for use with families having children 6 to 10 years old. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 82, 58-71.
6.
Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1996). Research on motivation and the gifted: Implications for identification, programming, and evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 220-221.
7.
Cole, K. C. (1998, March 11). Beating the pros to the punch. Los Angeles Times, pp. A1-A1, A14-A14.
8.
Cook, C., Morris, P., Gottfried, A. W., & Gottfried, A. E. (2003, April). Educational characteristics of highly academically motivated adolescents: A longitudinal analysis. Poster session presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
9.
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
10.
Corno, L., & Kanfer, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning and performance. In L. Darling-Hammer (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 301-341). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
11.
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45-63.
12.
Davis, H. G., & Connell, J. P. (1985). The effect of aptitude and achievement on the self-system. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 131-136.
13.
Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
14.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112-127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Jarwan, F. A. (2000). Identification of gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 271-282). New York: Elsevier.
16.
Gagné, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-based analysis. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 67-79). New York: Elsevier.
17.
Gagné, F., & St. Père, F. (2002). When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement?Intelligence, 30, 71-100.
18.
Gale, E. (1998, November 11). The formula for math mirth. Los Angeles Times, p. B2-B2.
19.
Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-645.
20.
Gottfried, A. E. (1986). Children’s academic intrinsic motivation inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
21.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
22.
Gottfried, A. E. (1998, April). Academic intrinsic motivation in high school students: Relationships with achievement, perception of competence, and academic anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
23.
Gottfried, A. E. (2001, August). Gifted motivation. Esther Katz Rosen Lecture on Gifted Children and Adolescents presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
24.
Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of maternal and dual-earner employment status in children’s development: A longitudinal study from infancy through early adolescence. In A. E. Gottfried & A. W. Gottfried (Eds.), Redefining families: Implications for children’s development (pp. 55-97). New York: Plenum.
25.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 104-113.
26.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 69, 1448-1460.
27.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3-13.
28.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994, August). Continuity of intrinsic motivation from infancy through early adolescence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
29.
Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179-183.
30.
Gottfried, A. W. (1985). Measures of socioeconomic status in child development research: Data and recommendations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31, 85-92.
31.
Gottfried, A. W., & Gottfried, A. E. (1984). Home environment and cognitive development in young children of middle-socioeconomic-status families. In A. W. Gottfried (Ed.), Home environment and early cognitive development: Longitudinal research (pp. 57-115). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D. W. (1994). Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects. New York: Plenum.
33.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E.Bathurst, K., Guerin, D. W., & Parramore, M. (2003). Socioeconomic status in children’s development and family environment: Infancy through adolescence. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 189-207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Cook, C., & Morris, P. (in press). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly.
35.
Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.). Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247-263). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Guerin, D. W., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Developmental stability and change in parent reports of temperament: A ten-year longitudinal investigation from infancy through preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 334-355.
37.
Guerin, D. W., Gottfried, A. W., Oliver, P., & Thomas, C. (2003). Temperament: Infancy through adolescence. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
38.
Henderson, B. B., Gold, S. R., & McCord, M. T. (1982). Daydreaming and curiosity in gifted and average children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 18, 576-582.
39.
Hom, H. (1988, March). Motivational orientation of the gifted student, threat of evaluation, and impact on performance. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
40.
Lens, W., & Rand, P. (2000). Motivation and cognition: Their role in the development of giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik, (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 193-202). New York: Elsevier.
41.
Leovy, J. (1999, May 14). Skid Row’s El Estudiante is now a scholar. Los Angeles Times, pp. A1-A1, A28-A28.
42.
Li, A. K. F. (1988). Self-perception and motivational orientation in gifted children. Roeper Review, 10, 175-180.
43.
Martin, D. (2001, January 14). To be old, gifted and employed is no longer rare. The New York Times, pp. B1-B1, B12-B12.
44.
Matheny, A. P. (1980). Bayley’s Infant Behavior Record: Components and twin analysis. Child Development, 51, 1157-1167.
45.
Moon, S. M. (2000, May). Personal talent: What is it and how can we study it? Paper presented at the fifth biennial Henry B. and Joycelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
46.
Moon, S. M. (2002, November). Personal talent. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Denver, CO.
47.
Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1994). Family Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
48.
Noble, K. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Arnold, K. D. (1999). To thine own self be true: A new model of female talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 140-149.
49.
Nobel Laureate Symposium. (2001, October). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the California Nobel Prize Centennial, San Francisco, CA.
50.
Pyryt, M. C. (2000). Talent development in science and technology. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 427-437). New York: Elsevier.
51.
Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. (2002). Stimulation seeking and intelligence: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 663-674.
52.
Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
54.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
55.
Vallerand, R. J., Gagné, F., Senecal, C., & Pelletier, L. G. (1994). A comparison of the school intrinsic motivation and perceived competence of gifted and regular students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 172-175.
56.
Vaughn, S. (2000, September 17). Sheer determination carried Jane Goodall on her unlikely path. Los Angeles Times, pp. W1-W1, W3-W3.
57.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
58.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
59.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
60.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
61.
Ziegler, A. & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik, (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3-21). New York: Elsevier.
