This study deals with the general question of how people process information about public affairs as they encounter it through the mass media. More specifically, the authors sought to examine the nature of the relationship between cognitive variables that play a major role in processing complex information. cognitive complexity, frame repertoires and factual information. It is hypothesized that these "knowledge structures" determine in part what people "get" out of news about public affairs. To test these relationships, the authors used survey research along with open-ended questions. The combination of these two methods was deemed appropriate because it addressed the active nature of information processing while maintaining the advantage of sample representativeness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Conover, P.J. & Feldman, S. (1984) 'How people organize the political world: A schematic model'. American Journal of Political Science28: 95-126.
2.
Crockett, W.H. (1965) 'Cognitive complexity and impression formation' . In: B.A. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research, Vol. 2 (New York: Academic Press): pp. 47-90.
3.
Fiske, S. & Kinder, D.R. (1981) 'Involvement, expertise and schema use: evidence from political cognition'. In: N. Cantor & J. Kihlstrom (Eds.). Personality, cognition and social interaction (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum): pp. 171-190.
4.
Fiske, T.S., Kinder, D.R. & Larter, W.M. (1983) 'The novice and expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition'. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology19: 381-400.
5.
Genova, B. & Greenberg, B. (1979) 'Interest in the news and the knowledge gap', Public Opinion Quarterly43: 79-91.
6.
Graber, D.A. (1984) Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (New York, NY: Longman).
7.
Graesser, A. & Nakamura, G. (1982) The psychology of learning and motivation (New York, NY: Academic Press).
8.
Hamill, R. & Lodge, M. (1986) 'Cognitive consequences of political sophistication' . In: R.R. Lau & D.O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: the 19th annual symposium on cognition (Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum): pp. 69-93.
9.
Higgins, E.T. & King, G. (1980) 'Accessibility of social constructs: information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability'. In: N. Cantor and J.F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition and social interaction (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum ): pp. 69-122.
10.
Hornik, R.C. (1990) The knowledge behavior gap in public information campaigns: A development communication view (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
11.
Kosicki, G.M., McLeod, J.M. & Amor, D.L. (1987) 'Processing the news: some individual strategies for selecting, sense-making and integrating'. Paper presented to the Political Communication Division of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
12.
Kraus, S. & Perloff, R. (1985) Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage ).
13.
Lane, R. (1962) Political ideology (New York : The Free Press).
14.
Lau, R.R. (1986) Political schemas, candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. In: R. Lau and D. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum): pp. 95-126.
15.
Lau, R.R. & Sears, D. (1986) Political cognition (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum).
16.
Linville, P.W. (1982) 'The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42: 193-211.
17.
Lippmann, W. (1922) Public opinion (New York: Harcourt, Brace).
18.
Lodge, M. (1985) 'Notes on a cognitive-science approach to political information processing'. Paper presented at the Chicago Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
19.
Markus, H.Zajonc, R.B. (1985) 'The cognitive perspective in social psychology' . In: G. Lindzey and Elliot Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology Vol. 1 (Third edition). (New York: Random House): pp. 137-230.
20.
McLeod, J.M., Kosicki, G., Pan, Z. & Allen, S. (1987) 'Audience perspectives on the news: Assessing their complexity and conceptual frames'. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. San Antonio, Texas.
21.
McLeod, J.M., Pan, Z. & Rucinski, D. (1988) 'Framing a complex issue: beyond remembering facts' . Paper submitted to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, Oregon .
22.
Park, R.S. (1940) 'News as a form of knowledge'. American Journal of Sociology45: 669-686.
23.
Pearce, W.B., Cronen, V.E. & Harris, L.M. (1982) 'Methodological considerations in building human communication theory'. In: F.X. Dance (ed.), Human communication theory (New York: Harper and Row): pp. 1-41.
24.
Robinson, J.P. & Levy, M.R. (1986) The main source: Learning from television news (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
25.
Roscho, B. (1975) News making (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
26.
Rumelhart, D.E. & D.A. Norman (1980) Analogic processes in learning. In: J.R. Anderson (ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum): 335-359.
27.
Schank, R.C. & R.P. Abelson (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum).
28.
Schramm (1973) Men, Messages, and Media: A Look at Human Communication ( New York: Harper & Row).
29.
Sudman, S. (1983) Applies sampling. In: P.H. Rossi, J.D. Wright, and A.B. Anderson (eds.), Handbook of Survey Research (New York: Academic Press): 145-194.
