Abstract
This study is designed to assess four factors which may account for differences in the six countries/areas' media coverage of the 1989 Chinese student demonstrations.
Four major findings emerge from the analysis: (1) political ideology played an important role in the direction, but not necessarily the extent, of the coverage of the events; (2) diplomatic sensitivity played an important role in the direction of coverage, especially for official or government media and even ameliorated differences in political ideology; (3) cultural affinity did not necessarily produce positive news coverage; and (4) geographical proximity did not affect the extent nor the direction of the coverage as much as the political ideology and diplomatic sensitivity did.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
