Borrowing from the literature of mass communication and development and its many variations over time, a model was formulated to explain the role of mass media and interpersonal discussion on two persistent communication concerns, namely, political efficacy and political ideology. These relationships were examined in light of their possible modification or refinement based on an individual's location in the social structure. Using survey data collected in an urban area of a media-rich underdeveloped country, eleven hypotheses were tested. A structural equation technique (LISREL) demonstrated that all the hypotheses were at least partially supported, furthermore the effects of the communication variables were all fully supported. We concluded that our model, developed from literature in the United States and Third World countries, appears to have substantial external validity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acock, A.C., Clarke, H.D., and Stewart M.C., 'A New Model for Old Measures: Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Efficacy,' The Journal of Politics47 (1985):1062.
2.
Adoni, H., and Mane, S., 'Media and the Social Construction of Reality: Toward an Integration of Theory and Research,' Communication Research11 (1984):323.
3.
Alisky, M., Latin American Media: Guidance and Censorship. (Ames, IA : Iowa State University Press, 1981 ).
4.
Allen, R.L. and Taylor, B.F., 'Media Public Affairs Exposure: Issues and Alternative Strategies,' Communication Monographs52 (1985 ):186.
5.
Allen, R.L. and Waks, L., 'Social Reality Construction: The Shaping of a Normative Equalitarian Attitude Toward the Social Role of Women and Blacks,' Howard Journal of Communication (1990):in press.
6.
Allen, R.L., and Izcaray, F., 'Nominal Agenda Diversity in a Media-Rich, Less Developed Society,' Communication Research15 (1988 ):29.
7.
Archibald, W.P., Social Psychology as Political Economy (Toronto, Canada: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Limited, 1978).
8.
Atkin, C.K., 'Communication and Political Socialization,' in D.D. Nimmo and K.R. Sanders (eds.) Handbook of Political Communication (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1981), pp. 299-328.
9.
Bagdikian, B.H., 'The U.S. Media: Supermarket or Assembly Line?', Journal of Communication35 (1985):97.
10.
Bagozzi, R.P., and Yi, Y., 'On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,' Academy of Marketing Science16 (1988):74.
11.
Baloyra, E.A., and Martz, J.D., Political Attitudes in Venezuela (Austin, Tx: University of Texas Press, 1979).
12.
Becker, L.B. and Whitney, C.D., 'Effects of Media Dependencies: Audience Assessment of Government' Communication Research7(1980):95.
13.
Becker, L.B., McCombs, M.E., and McLeod, J.M., 'The Development of Political Cognitions,' in S.H. Chaffee (Ed.) Political communication: Issues and strategies for research (Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage, 1975).
14.
Bentler, P.M., and Bonett, D.G., 'Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures,' Psychological Bulletin88 (1980):588.
15.
Bollen, K.A., Structural Equations with Latent Variables (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989).
16.
Carmines, E.G. and McIver, J.P., 'Analyzing Model with Unobserved Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures,' in G.W. Bohrenstedt and E.F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social Measurement (Newbury Park, CA.: Sage, 1981), pp. 65-115.
17.
Chaffee, S.H., 'Mass Media Effects: New Research Perspectives,' in G.C. Wilhoit and H. deBock (Eds.), Mass Communication Review Yearbook (Beverly Hills, CA. : Sage, 1980), Vol. 1, pp. 77-108.
18.
Chaffee, S.H., 'Mediated Interpersonal Communication: Toward a New Typology,' in G. Gumpert and R. Cathcart (Eds.) InterMedia (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
19.
Chaffee, S.H. and Izcaray, F., 'Mass Communication Functions in a Media-Rich Developing Society,' Communication Research2 (1975):367.
20.
Comstock, G., Television in America (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1980).
21.
Craig, S.C. and Maggioto, M.A., 'Political Discontent and Action,' Journal of Politics43 (1981):514.
22.
Dowse, R.W. and Hughes, J.A., Political Sociology (New York: John Wiley, 1972).
23.
Edelstein, A., 'Decision Making and Mass Communication: A Conceptual and Methodological Approach to Public Opinion,' in P. Clarke (Ed.), New Models for Mass Communication Research (Newbury Park, CA.: Sage, 1972), pp. 81-118.
24.
Eyal, C.H., 'The Roles of Newspaper and Television in Agenda Setting,' in G.C. Wilhoit and H. deBock (Eds.), Mass Communication Review YearbookBeverly Hills, CA.: Sage, 1981), Vol. 2, pp. 225-234.
25.
Gardner, P.D. and Stevenson, R.L., 'Communication Development in Venezuela and Mexico: Goals, Promises, and Reality,' Journalism Monographs, No. 108, 1988.
26.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N., 'The "Mainstreaming" of America: Violence Profile No. 11,' Journal of Communication30 (1980 ):10.
27.
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N., 'Charting the Mainstream: Television's Contributions to Political Orientations ,' in D.A. Graber (Ed.), Media Power in Politics, (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1984), pp. 118-137.
28.
Herman, E.S., 'Diversity of News: "Marginalizing" the Opposition,' Journal of Communication35 (1985 ):135.
29.
Izcaray, F. and Izcaray, O.L., 'La Construccion de Indices de Status Socioeconomico Critica y Metodo,'Asociacion Venezolana de Psicologia Social, 3, (1986).
30.
Izcaray, F. and McNelly, J.T., 'Selective Media Use by Venezuelans: The Passing of the Passive Audience in a Rapidly Developing Society,' Studies in Latin American Popular Culture6 (1987):27.
31.
Izcaray, O.M. and Izcaray, F., 'Que Hacemos en el Tiempo Libre?' (Barquisimeto: Fundacion De Estudios Regionales , 1987).
32.
Jackman, M.R. and Jackman, R.W., 'An Interpretation of the Relation Between Objective and Subjective Social Status,' American Sociological Review38 (1973):569.
33.
Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D., LISREL V; Estimation of Linear Structural Equation Systems by Maximum Likelihood Methods (Chicago: International Educational Service, 1984).
34.
Kuo, C., 'Media Use, Interpersonal Communication and Political Socialization: An Interactional Model Analysis Using LISREL,' in M.L. McLauglin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Newbury Park, CA.: Sage , 1986), pp. 625-641.
35.
Lerner, D., The Passing of Traditional Society (Glencoe, IL.: Free Press, 1958).
36.
Martin, R., Chaffee, S.H., and Izcaray, F., 'Media and Consumerism in Venezuela,' Journalism Quarterly56 (1979): 296-304, 335.
37.
Martin, R., McNelly, J.T., and Izcaray, F., 'Is Media Exposure Unidimensional? A Socioeconomic Approach,' Journalism Quarterly53 (1976):619.
38.
Martz, J.D. and Baloyra, E.A., Electoral Mobilization and Public Opinion (Chapel Hill, N.C.: The University of North Carolina Press, 1973).
39.
Martz, J.D. and Myers, D.J., 'Venezuelan Democracy and the Future,' in J.D. Martz and D.J. Myers (Eds.), Venezuela: The Democratic Experience (New York: Praeger, 1977).
40.
Masmoudi, M., 'The New World Information Order,' in G. Gerbner and M. Siefert (Eds.) World Communications (New York: Longman, 1984), pp. 14-27.
41.
McClosky, H. and Zaller, J., The American Ethos (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984).
42.
McNelly, J.T. and Izcaray, F., 'International News Exposure and National Images in a Third World Setting ,' Paper presented at the 14th Congress and General Assembly of the International Association for Mass Communication Research , Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1984.
43.
Melkote, 'Biases in Development Support Communication,' Gazette40 (1987):39.
44.
Miller, M.M. and Reese, S.D., 'Media Dependency as Interaction: Effects of Exposure and Reliance on Political Activity and Efficacy,' Communication Research9 (1982):227.
45.
Miller, W.E., Miller, A.H., and Schneider, E.J., American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook, 1952-1978 ( Cambridge: MA.: Harvard University Press, 1980).
46.
Montero, M., Ideologia, alienacion e identidad nacional (Caracas: EBUCV, 1984).
47.
Pomper, G., Voter's Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1975).
48.
Popkin, S., Gorman, J.Phillips, C., and Smith, J., 'Comment: What Have You Done for me Lately? Toward an Investment Theory of Voting,'American Political Science Review70 (1976):799.
49.
Queiroz De Ramos, A., Minusvalia nacional y externalidad (Caracas: Escuela De Psicologia, UCV, 1980).
50.
Rogers, E.M., 'The Rise and Fall of the Dominant Paradigm,' Journal of Communication28 (1978):64.
51.
Rogers, E.M., Modernization Among Peasants: The Impact of Communication ( New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969).
52.
Salazar, Creencias, Actitudes Nacionales e Ideologia Dependiente (Lima: XVII Congreso Interamericano De Psicologia, 1979).
53.
Schramm, W., Mass Media and National Development (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979).
54.
Schramm, W. and Porter, W., Men, Women, Messages and Media (New York: Harper & Row, 1982).
55.
Sigelman, L. and Feldman, S., 'Efficacy, Mistrust and Political Mobilization: A Cross-National Analysis ,' Comparative Political Studies, 16 (1983):118.
56.
Weaver, D.H. and Buddenbaum, J.M. , 'Newspapers and Television: A Review of Research on Uses and Effects,' in G.C. Wilhoit and H. deBock (Eds.) Mass Communication Yearbook (Newbury Park, CA.: Sage , 1980), pp. 371-380.
