This article empirically examines the impact of South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) on agricultural exports of India vis-à-vis SAARC and the rest of the world from 2000 to 2022 using the Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator and Heckman selection method. Estimating a fully saturated gravity model, the findings of the preferred model reveal that SAFTA fails to boost intra-regional agriculture trade among the examined countries. The coefficient of the trade creation variable SAFTAij is negative and statistically significant, reflecting the ineffectiveness of SAFTA in boosting the intra-regional agriculture trade among the partner countries. Conversely, the estimated coefficients of the other two regional trade dummies, SAFTAi and SAFTAj, are positive and statistically significant, indicating that trade activities (exports and imports) with non-members increased, implying the trade deflection and prioritisation of external markets. The ineffective outcome of SAFTA due to its design, structural flaws and external constraints warrants immediate policy attention to bolster the regional trade.
AndersonJ. E., & MarcouillerD. (2002). Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 342–352.
2.
AndersonJ. E., & Van WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
3.
BaierS. L., & BergstrandJ. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?Journal of international Economics, 71(1), 72–95.
4.
BhagwatiJ. (1993). Regionalism and multilateralism: An overview. In De MeloJ., & PanagariyaA. (Eds.), New dimensions in regional integration (pp. 22–51). Cambridge University Press.
5.
BurfisherM. E., RobinsonS., & ThierfelderK. (2001). The impact of NAFTA on the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 125–144.
6.
DadakasD., Ghazvini KorS., & FargherS. (2020). Examining the trade potential of the UAE using a gravity model and a Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(5), 619–646.
7.
De GrootH. L., LindersG. J., RietveldP., & SubramanianU. (2004). The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos, 57(1), 103–123.
8.
EggerP., & PfaffermayrM. (2003). The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empirical Economics, 28(3), 571–580.
9.
EkanayakeE. M., MukherjeeA., & VeeramacheneniB. (2010). Trade blocks and the gravity model: A study of economic integration among Asian developing countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 25(4), 627–643.
10.
EndohM. (1999). Trade creation and trade diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960–1994. Applied Economics, 31(2), 207–216.
11.
EthierW. (1998). Regionalism in a multilateral world. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1214–1245.
12.
FeenstraR. C. (2016). Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press.
13.
GauravK., & BhartiN. (2019). Has trade improved from SAPTA to SAFTA? Evidence from the gravity model. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 23(4), 532–548.
14.
Gómez-HerreraE. (2013). Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade. Empirical Economics, 44(3), 1087–1111.
15.
GrossmanG., & HelpmanE. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review, 84, 850–883.
16.
HavemanJ., & HummelsD. (1998). Trade creation and trade diversion: New empirical results. Journal of Transnational Management Development, 3(2), 47–72.
17.
HeadK., & MayerT. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. Handbook of international economics (Vol. 4, pp. 131)–195). Elsevier.
18.
HelpmanE., MelitzM., & RubinsteinY. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.
19.
JagdambeS., & KannanE. (2020). Effects of ASEAN–India free trade agreement on agricultural trade: The gravity model approach. World Development Perspectives, 19, 100212.
20.
JayasingheS., & SarkerR. (2008). Effects of regional trade agreements on trade in agrifood products: Evidence from gravity modeling using disaggregated data. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 30(1), 61–81.
21.
KrishnaP. (1998). Regionalism and multilateralism: A political economy approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 227–251.
22.
KruegerA. O. (1999). Are preferential trading arrangements trade-liberalizing or protectionist?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(4), 105–124.
23.
KumarC., & BhartiN. (2021). Post-SAFTA NTMs for agricultural trade: Revelations from the India–South Asia approach. Foreign Trade Review, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732520961309
24.
LambertD., & McKoyS. (2009). Trade creation and diversion effects of preferential trade associations on agricultural and food trade. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 17–39.
25.
LienD., OhH. C., & SelmierW. T. (2012). Confucius institute effects on China’s trade and FDI: Isn’t it delightful when folks afar study Hanyu?International Review of Economics & Finance, 21(1), 147–155.
26.
MageeC. S. (2008). New measures of trade creation and trade diversion. Journal of International Economics, 75(2), 349–362.
27.
MukherjiI. N. (2014). Agricultural trade liberalization for food security in South Asia. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the, Pacific (ESCAP).
28.
PanagariyaA. (2002). Preferential trade liberalization: The traditional theory and new developments. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 287–331.
29.
RobertsonR., & EstevadeordalA. (2009). Gravity, bilateral agreements, and trade diversion in the Americas. Cuadernos de Economia—Latin American Journal of Economics, 46(133), 3–31.
30.
SchottP. K. (2004). Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 647–678.
31.
SilvaJ. S., & TenreyroS. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658.
32.
SilvaJ. S., & TenreyroS. (2010). Has the euro increased trade? (No. 320). Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
33.
SilvaJ. M. S., TenreyroS., & WindmeijerF. (2015). Testing competing models for non-negative data with many zeros. Journal of Econometric Methods, 4(1), 29–46.
34.
SummersL. (1991). Regionalism and the world trading system. Policy implications of trade and currency zones (pp. 295–301). https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/3765/1991-S91SUMME.pdf
35.
SunL., & ReedM. R. (2010). Impacts of free trade agreements on agricultural trade creation and trade diversion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(5), 1351–1363.
36.
TangD. (2005). Effects of the regional trading arrangements on trade: Evidence from the NAFTA, ANZCER and ASEAN countries, 1989–2000. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(2), 241–265.
37.
TinbergenJ. (1962). Shaping the world economy. The Twentieth Century Fund.
38.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & Asian Development Bank (UNCTAD). (2015). Food security in South Asia: Developing regional supply chains for the food processing industry.
39.
YangS., & Martinez-ZarzosoI. (2014). A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area. China Economic Review, 29, 138–151.
