This article departs from only conventional trade in final goods and focuses on the incentive that induces the producers of final goods to import raw materials from abroad instead of using domestically produced intermediate goods. The article then explores the plausible impact of skill formation and emigration of both unskilled and skilled labour on the incentive for fragmentation. The results suggest that a drive towards skill formation expands the zone of international fragmentation. Again, emigration of either type of labour usually reduces the incentive to fragment the production process. The effect on the overall volume of imports depends on the degree of complementarity between factors of production like skilled labour and foreign capital. Not only does the article capture the trade-off between emigration and skill formation and their opposite impact on the zone of fragmentation, but it also captures the linkage between the emigration of unskilled workers and their skill formation by introducing the concept of ‘unskilled-pushed skilled emigration’.
AsgariH. (2011). An investigation of brain drain from Iran to OECD countries based on gravity model. Iranian Economic Review, 15(29), 89–99.
6.
BaldwinR. E. (2012). Global supply chains: Why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. CEPR Discussion Papers 9103, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
7.
BorjasG. J. (2001). Heaven’s door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton University Press.
8.
CardD. (1990). The impact of the Mariel boatlift on the Miami labor market. ILR Review, 43(2), 245–257.
9.
CardD. (2009). Immigration and inequality. American Economic Review, 99(2), 1–21.
10.
ChatterjeeT., & GuptaK. (2014a). International fragmentation in the presence of alternative health sector scenario: a theoretical analysis. In DattaS. K. & SenguptaA. (Eds.), Development, environment and sustainable livelihood (pp. 239–259). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
11.
ChatterjeeT., & GuptaK. (2014b). Trade liberalisation, health care and international fragmentation: The role of health capital mobility. The Pakistan Development Review, 53(1), 57–65.
12.
ChatterjeeT., & GuptaK. (2015). Health care quality and finite changes of trade policy: A general equilibrium analysis. Foreign Trade Review, 50(1), 21–30.
13.
DeardorffA. V. (2001). International provision of trade services, trade, and fragmentation. Review of International Economics, 9(2), 233–248.
14.
GoldbergP. K., KhandelwalA. K., PavcnikN., & TopalovaP. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly journal of economics, 125(4), 1727–1767.
15.
JonesR. W. (2000). A framework for fragmentation (No. 00-056/2). Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper.
16.
JonesR. W., & KierzkowskiH. (2004). Globalization and the consequences of international fragmentation. In CalvoG. A., DornbuschR. & ObstfeldM. (Eds.) Money, capital mobility, and trade: Essays in honor of Robert A. Mundell (pp. 365–384). MIT Press.
17.
JonesR. W., & MarjitS. (2001). The role of international fragmentation in the development process. American Economic Review, 91(2), 363–366.
18.
KarS., & BeladiH. (2004). Skill formation and international migration: Welfare perspective of developing countries. Japan and the World Economy, 16(1), 35–54.
19.
KarS., & Guha-KhasnobisB. (2006). Foreign capital, skill formation, and migration of skilled workers. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 9(2), 107–123.
MarjitS., & KarS. (2009). Emigration, wage inequality and vanishing sectors. University of Nottingham, GEP Research Paper, 20.
22.
MarjitS., BeladiH., & ChakrabartiA. (2004). Trade and wage inequality in developing countries. Economic Inquiry, 42(2), 295–303.
23.
MarjitS., SenS., & GuptaK. (2023). Customs union, wage inequality and welfare in general equilibrium,Foreign Trade Review, 58(1), 45–67.
24.
McKenzieD., & RapoportH. (2007). Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: Theory and evidence from Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 84(1), 1–24.
25.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2019). Globalization in transition: The future of trade and value chains.
26.
MishraP. (2007). Emigration and wages in source countries: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Development Economics, 82(1), 180–199.
27.
MitraS., & GuptaK. (2020). Fragmentation, skill formation and international capital mobility. The Singapore Economic Review, 65(02), 335–350.
28.
OdaM., & StappR. (2009). Factor mobility and wage inequality. InInternational Trade and Economic Dynamics: Essays in Memory of Koji Shimomura (pp. 63–72). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
29.
OladiR., & BeladiH. (2007). International migration and real wages. Economics Bulletin, 6(30), 1–8.
30.
OttavianoG. I., & PeriG. (2012). Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(1), 152–197.
31.
PopraweM. (2015). On the relationship between corruption and migration: Empirical evidence from a gravity model of migration. Public Choice, 163, 337–354.
32.
SanyalK. K. (1983). Vertical specialization in a Ricardian model with a continuum of stages of production. Economica, 50(197), 71–78.
33.
TopalovaP., & KhandelwalA. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of economics and statistics, 93(3), 995–1009.
34.
VanderkampJ. (1977). The gravity model and migration behaviour: An economic interpretation. Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 89–102.
35.
WoodA. (1995). How trade hurt unskilled workers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(3), 57–80.
36.
WoodA. (1997). Openness and wage inequality in developing countries: The Latin American challenge to East Asian conventional wisdom. The World Bank Economic Review, 11(1), 33–57.
37.
YabuuchiS., & ChaudhuriS. (2007). International migration of labour and skilled–unskilled wage inequality in a developing economy. Economic Modelling, 24(1), 128–137.
