Based on input/output tables that contain disaggregated data from 45 industries grouped into 16 sectors from 1995 to 2020 across 66 countries, we carry out a gravity analysis to examine how imported inputs affect bilateral exports. In terms of econometric methodology, we use pseudo Poisson maximum likelihood (PPML) as well as Instrumental-Variable Tobit methods. Our results consistently show a positive and significant effect of imported inputs on bilateral exports.
AcharyaR. C., & KellerW. (2009). Technology transfer through imports. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 42(4), 1411–1448.
2.
AgnostevaD., AndersonJ. E., & YotovY. V. (2014). Intra-national trade costs: Measures and aggregation. Working Paper No. 19872. National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AmitiM., & KoningsJ. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from indonesia. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611–1638.
4.
AndersonJ. E., & van WincoopE. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 1, 170.
5.
BaierS. L., & BergstrandJ. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95.
6.
BaldwinR., & TaglioniD. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. NBER Working Paper No. 12516. National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BaldwinR. E. (1966). The role of capital-goods trade in the theory of international trade. The American Economic Review, 56(4), 841–848.
8.
BasM. (2012). Input-trade liberalization and firm export decisions: Evidence from argentina. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 481–493.
9.
BasM., & Strauss-KahnV. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from france. Review of World Economics, 150, 241–275.
10.
BasM., & Strauss-KahnV. (2015). Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading. Journal of International Economics, 95(2), 250–262.
11.
BeverelliC., KeckA., LarchM., & YotovY. (2018). Institutions, trade and development: A quantitative analysis [CESifo Working paper]. Center for Economic Studies and ifo, Institute (CESifo).
12.
CavalloM., & LandryA. (2018). Capital-goods imports and US growth [Staff Working Paper 2018–1]. Bank of Canada.
13.
ChengI., & WallH. J. (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Federal Reserve Bank Of St. Louis Review, 87(1), 49–63.
14.
Chevassus-LozzaE., Gaign´eC., & Le MenerL. (2013). Does input trade liberalization boost downstream firms’ exports? Theory and firm-level evidence. Journal of International Economics, 90(2), 391–402.
15.
EatonJ., & KortumS. (2001). Trade in capital goods. European Economic Review, 45(7), 1195–1235.
EggerP., & NigaiS. (2015). Structural gravity with dummies only: Constrained anova–type estimation of gravity models. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 81–99.
18.
EggerP. H., LarchM., & YotovY. V. (2022). Gravity estimations with interval data: Revisiting the impact of free trade agreements. Economica, 89(353), 44–61.
19.
EggerP. H., NigaiS., & StreckerN. M. (2019). The taxing deed of globalization. American Economic Review, 109(2), 353–390.
20.
FengL., LiZ., & SwensonD. L. (2016). The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from chinese firms. Journal of International Economics, 101, 86–101.
21.
FindlayR., & JonesR. W. (2001). Input trade and the location of production. American Economic Review, 91(2), 29–33.
22.
FrancoisJ., & WoerzJ. (2008). Producer services, manufacturing linkages, and trade. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 8, 199–229.
23.
GeY., LaiH., & ZhuS. (2011). Intermediates import and gains from trade liberalization. University of International Business and Economics technical report.
24.
GoldbergP. K., KhandelwalA. K., PavcnikN., & TopalovaP. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from india. The Quarterly journal of economics, 125(4), 1727–1767.
25.
HalpernL., KorenM., & SzeidlA. (2015). Imported inputs and productivity. American Economic Review, 105(12), 3660–3703.
26.
HeadK., MayerT., & RiesJ. (2010). The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics, 81(4), 1–14.
27.
HeidB., LarchM., & YotovV. (2017). Estimating the effects of non-discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models [Cesifo Working Paper No 6735]. Center for Economic Studies and ifo, Institute (CESifo).
28.
HummelsD., IshiiJ., & YiK.-M. (2001). The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of international Economics, 54(1), 75–96.
29.
JonesR. W. (2000). Globalization and the theory of input trade. Vol. 8. MIT Press.
30.
KasaharaH., & LaphamB. (2013). Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence. Journal of international Economics, 89(2), 297–316.
31.
KasaharaH., & RodrigueJ. (2008). Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? plant-level evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106–118.
32.
KitengeE., & LahiriS. (2020). Is the internet bringing down language-based barriers to international trade? [Working paper (unpublished)]. Wiley Online Library.
33.
LeeJ.-W. (1995). Capital goods imports and long-run growth. Journal of development economics, 48(1), 91–110.
34.
LiuQ., & QiuL. D. (2016). Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from chinese firms’ patent filings. Journal of International Economics, 103, 166–183.
35.
MagnusJ. R., & VasnevA. L. (2008). Using macro data to obtain better micro forecasts. Econometric Theory, 24(2), 553–579.
36.
MayerT., & ZignagoS. (2011). Notes on cepii’s distances measures: The geodist database. Working Paper No. 25. CEPII.
37.
MelitzJ., & ToubalF. (2014). Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. Journal of International Economics, 92(2), 351–363.
38.
MiroudotS., LanzR., & RagoussisA. (2009). Trade in intermediate goods and services. [OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 93]. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
39.
MuendlerM.-A. (2004). Trade, technology and productivity: A study of Brazilian manufacturers 1986–1998 [CESifo Working Paper No. 1148].
PaudelN. S., & LahiriS. (2024). The effects of state-level foreign manufacturing imports on domestic inter-state and intra-state sales in the usa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 297–305.
42.
Santos SilvaJ., & TenreyroS. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658.
43.
SanyalK. K., & JonesR. W. (1982). The theory of trade in middle products. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 16–31.
44.
Van BiesebroeckJ. (2003). Revisiting some productivity debates. National Bureau of Economic Research.
45.
WeidnerM., & ZylkinT. (2021). Bias and consistency in three-way gravity models. Journal of International Economics, 132, 103513.
46.
World Bank (2017). World development indicators databank. Retrieved July23, 2023, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
47.
YotovY. V., LarchM., MonteiroJ., & PiermartiniR. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. World Trade Organization.
48.
YuM. (2015). Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: Evidence from chinese firms. The Economic Journal, 125(585), 943–988.
