Using a rich firm-level panel dataset of Indian manufacturing over 2010–2018, this study aims to identify the spillover effects associated with foreign direct investment (FDI). To this end, we distinguish spillover effects into horizontal (Intra-industry linkage) and vertical (backward or downstream and forward or upstream Inter-industry linkages) FDI channels. We employ various semi-parametric methods to tackle the endogeneity issues in productivity estimation. We find that backward spillover from the downstream multinational enterprises is the only source of total factor productivity gains. However, the magnitude of negative forward–vertical linkage is larger than the positive backward–vertical effect. The analysis also broadly compares technology spillovers for domestic and all firms in the sector. Finally, we investigate productivity spillover across industries based on their technology intensity. Our findings suggest that industry heterogeneity is a key driver of FDI spillover.
AckerbergD. A., CavesK., & FrazerG. (2015). Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411–2451.
2.
AitkenB. J., & HarrisonA. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–618.
3.
BalakrishnanP., PushpangadanK., & BabuM. S. (2000). Trade liberalisation and productivity growth in manufacturing: Evidence from firm-level panel data. Economic & Political Weekly, 35(41), 3679–3682.
4.
Barge-GilA., LópezA., & Núñez-SánchezR. (2020). Technological spillovers from multinational firms. World Economy, 43(12), 3184–3202.
5.
BellM., & MarinA. (2004). Where do foreign direct investment-related technology spillovers come from in emerging economies? An Exploration in Argentina in the 1990s. European Journal of Development Research, 16(3), 653–686.
6.
BlalockG., & GertlerP. J. (2008). Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 402–421.
7.
BlalockG., & GertlerP. J. (2009). How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 192–199.
8.
BlomstromM. (1986). Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of Mexico. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(1), 97–110.
9.
BlomstromM., & KokkoA. (2001). Foreign direct investment and spillovers of technology. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(5/6), 435.
10.
BournakisI. (2021). Spillovers and productivity; Revisiting the puzzle with EU firm level data. Econ. Lett, 201, 109804.
11.
BournakisI., PapaioannouS., & PapanastassiouM. (2022). Multinationals and domestic TFP: Competition effects, knowledge spillovers and foreign ownership. World Economy, 45(12), 3715–3750.
12.
CarluccioJ., & FallyT. (2013). Foreign entry and spillovers with technological incompatibilities in the supply chain. Journal of International Economics, 90(1), 123–135.
13.
CavesR. E. (1971). International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38(149), 1.
14.
CavesR. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176–193.
15.
DasS. (1987). Externalities, and technology transfer through multinational corporations: A theoretical analysis. Journal of International Economics, 22(1–2), 171–182.
16.
De LoeckerJ. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98.
17.
DjankovS., & HoekmanB. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49–64.
18.
DoganE., WongK. N., & YapM. M. C. (2017). Vertical and horizontal spillovers from foreign direct investment: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing. Asian Economic Papers, 16(3), 158–183.
19.
EckK., & HuberS. (2016). Product sophistication and spillovers from foreign direct investment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 49(4), 1658–1684.
20.
Ernesto López-CórdovaJ. (2002). NAFTA and Mexico’s manufacturing productivity: An empirical investigation using micro-level data. Inter-American Development Bank.
21.
FindlayR. (1978). Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: A simple dynamic model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92(1), 1.
22.
GlobermanS. (1979). Foreign direct Investment and ‘spillover’ efficiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 12(1), 42–56.
23.
GoldbergP. K., KhandelwalA., PavcnikN., & TopalovaP. (2009). Trade liberalization and new imported inputs. American Economic Review, 99, 494–500.
24.
GorgH., & StroblE. (2001). Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis. Economic Journal, 111(475), F723–F739.
25.
GrilichesZ., (1991). The search for R&D spillovers. (NBER Working Paper, 3768).
26.
HamiltonB. H., & NickersonJ. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78.
27.
HavranekT., & IrsovaZ. (2011). Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: Why results vary and what the true effect is. Journal of International Economics, 85(2), 234–244.
28.
JavorcikB. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.
29.
KathuriaV. (2002). Liberalisation, FDI and productivity spillovers: An analysis of Indian manufacturing firms. Oxford Economic Papers, 54, 688–718.
30.
KathuriaV. (2010). Does the technology gap influence spillovers? A post-liberalization analysis of Indian manufacturing industries. Oxford Development Studies, 38(2), 145–170.
31.
LallS. (1980). Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: An empirical study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 42(3), 203–226.
32.
LeibensteinH. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. ‘X-efficiency’. American Economic Review, 56(3), 392–415.
33.
LevinsohnJ., & PetrinA. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.
34.
MalikS. K. (2015). Conditional technology spillovers from foreign direct investment: Evidence from Indian manufacturing industries. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 43(2), 183–198.
35.
MarinA., & SasidharanS. (2010). Heterogeneous MNC subsidiaries and technological spillovers: Explaining positive and negative effects in India. Research Policy, 39(9), 1227–1241.
36.
MohnenP. (2019). R&D, innovation and productivity. Forthcoming in Handbook of Economic Performance.
37.
MondalS., & PantM. (2018). Firm capabilities and productivity spillovers from FDI: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. In SiddharthanN. S. & NarayananK. (Eds.), Globalisation of technology (pp. 91–125).
38.
NewmanC., RandJ., TalbotT., & TarpF. (2015). Technology transfers, foreign investment and productivity spillovers. European Economic Review, 76, 168–187.
39.
OECD (2011). ISIC REV. 3 Technology intensity definition: Classification of manufacturing industries into categories based on R&D intensities.
40.
PradeepV., BhattacharyaM., & ChenJ.-R. (2017). Spillover effects of research and development, exports and foreign investment on productivity. Journal of South Asian Development, 12(1), 18–41.
41.
RijeshR. (2023). Trade reforms, technology import, and firm productivity in the Indian manufacturing sector. Economic & Political Weekly, 15, 42–50.
42.
RojecM., & KnellM. (2018). Why is there a lack of evidence on knowledge spillovers from foreign direct investment?Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(3), 579–612.
43.
RoyI., & PaulB. S. (2022). Knowledge spillovers and productivity growth: Role of absorptive capacity in the Indian manufacturing sector. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 22, 233–257.
44.
SagarP. R. (2013). Sectoral trends and patterns of FDI in India. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services and Management Research, 2(7), 102–111.
45.
SrivastavaV. (1996). Liberalization, productivity, and competition: A panel study of India manufacturing. Oxford University Press.
46.
TopalovaP., & KhandelwalA. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009.
47.
UNCTAD. (2019). World investment report 2019 (Chapter II). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
48.
UNCTAD. (2022). Handbook of statistics 2022 (p. 53). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
49.
Van BeverenI. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 98–128.
50.
WangJ.-Y., & BlomströmM. (1992). Foreign investment and technology transfer. European Economic Review, 36(1), 137–155.
51.
Wang NormanY. (2010). FDI and productivity growth: The role of inter-industry linkages. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(4), 1243–1272.
52.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), 112–114.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
