This study aims to predict electricity cross-border trade partners based on the network theory and to investigate the position and importance of West Asia community in the global electricity trade network. For this purpose, the global network is constructed to examine the role of each node in the network for the time period of 2010–2018. Different communities are identified to proceed with the network analysis. The innovative analysis is link prediction to forecast missing links from the network. The results suggest more interconnectedness among community members, especially Iran, Turkey and Russia, which are the prominent nodes in the community. The link prediction outcomes offer the most probable missing links from the community and lead us to select the common neighbour approach as the most efficient method.
AllerC., DuctorL., & HerreriasM. J. (2015). The world trade network and the environment. Energy Economics, 52, 55–68.
2.
AnW., & LiuY.-H. (2016). keyplayer: An R package for locating key players in social networks. The R Journal, 8, 257–268. 10.32614/RJ-2016-018
3.
BlondelV. D., GuillaumeJ. L., LambiotteR., & LefebvreE. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), 10008.
4.
BojanowskiM., & ChrołB. (2019). Proximity-based methods for link prediction in graphs with R package ‘linkprediction’. ASK. Research & Methods, 29, 5–28.
5.
BowenB. H., SparrowF. T., & YuZ. (1999). Modeling electricity trade policy for the twelve nations of the Southern African Power Pool (SAPP). Utilities Policy, 8, 183–197.
6.
ChaneyT. (2011). The network structure of international trade. American Economic Review, 104. 10.1257/aer.104.11
7.
ChenF., HuangK., HouY., & DingT. (2019). Long-term cross-border electricity trading model under the background of Global Energy Interconnection. Global Energy Interconnection, 2, 122–129. 10.1016/j.gloei.2019.07.004
8.
EverettM., & BorgattiS. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375–395. 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2
9.
FilippiniaM., & PachauriS. (2004). Elasticities of electricity demand in urban Indian households. Energy Policy, 32, 429–436.
10.
FreemanL. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
11.
GuanQ., GaoX., HuangS., & LiH. (2016). Estimating potential trade links in the international crude oil trade: A link prediction approach. Energy, 102, 406–415. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.099
12.
GuimeraR., & AmaralL. A. N. (2005) Cartography of complex networks: Modules and universal roles. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, Theory and Experiment, 02, P02001.
13.
HallD., & NguyenT. (2017). Electricity liberalisation in developing countries. Progress in Development Studies, 17. 10.1177/1464993416688824
14.
HanelyJ. A., & McNeilB. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29–36.
15.
HungM., & HuangT. (2015). Dynamic demand for residential electricity in Taiwan under seasonality and increasing-block pricing. Energy Economics, 48, 168–177.
16.
IEA (2021). Global Energy Review 2021. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021
17.
International Energy Agency (2020). Electricity information: Overview, 2019. www.iea.org/publications/reports/globalevoutlook2019/
18.
JaccardP. (1912). The distribution of the flora of the alpine zone. New Phytologist, 11, 37–50.
19.
JiL., JiaX., ChiuA., & XuM. (2016). Global electricity trade network: structures and implications. PLoS One, 11(8), e0160869. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160869
20.
JiangM., ChenY., & ChenL. (2015). Link prediction in networks with nodes attributes by similarity propagation. CoRR, vol. abs/1502.04380, Feb. 2015. [Online]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.04380
21.
KrncM., & ŠkrekovskiR. (2020). Group degree centrality and centralization in net- works. Mathematics, 8(10), 1810. 10.3390/math8101810
22.
NewmanM. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 8577–8582.
23.
NewmanM. E., & GirvanM. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113–026113. 10.1103/PHYSREVE.69.026113
24.
SchönheitD., WeinholdR., & DiersteinC. (2020). The impact of different strategies for generation shift keys (GSKs) on the flow-based market coupling domain: A model-based analysis of Central Western Europe. Applied Energy, 258, 1–16.
ThomasS. (2004). Electricity liberalization: The beginning of an end. Public Services International Research Unit.
27.
YangY., PoonJ., LiuY., & Bagchi-SenS. (2015). Small and flat worlds: A complex network analysis of international trade in crude oil. Energy, 93, 534–543. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.079
28.
ZhangCh., ZhouK., YangS., & ShaoZh. (2017). On electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 353–368. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.071
