This article has examined the determinants of export and import flows of countries in the South Asia through estimations for a country panel data of eight countries during the period 1985–2011 using a gravity model. The estimated result suggests that gross domestic product (GDP) and population among other factors can explain export and import flows. Perhaps the most important finding of the study is that South Asia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) has produced trade creation among its members. Finally, the study found that geographic distance might be impeding trade, and tariff has negative effect on the trade. The study also found that the nature of trade is intra-industry among the member countries of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).
AhmedS. (2009). Free trade among South, East and South-East Asian countries: A step towards Asian integration. Foreign Trade Review, XLIV(2), 3–32.
2.
AhmedS. (2010). India–Japan FTA in goods: A partial and general equilibrium analysis. Paper presented in Thirteenth Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis ‘Trade for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth and Development’ during 9–11 June 2010 in Malaysia.
3.
AhmedS. (2011). India–Korea CEPA: An assessment. Korea and the World Economy, 12(1), 1–53.
4.
AhmedS. (2015). Trade normalization between India and Pakistan: Prospects for South Asia. In AhmedVaqarSuleriAbid Q. (Eds), Making growth inclusive, just and sustainable in South Asia, Proceedings of the 5th South Asia Economic Summit, 11–13th September 2012. Sustainable Development Policy Institute, Islamabad, Forthcoming.
5.
AndersonJ. (1979). Theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
6.
AndersonJames E.Van WincoopEric (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
7.
ArmingtonPaul S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Staff Papers–International Monetary Fund, 16(1), 159–178.
8.
BacchettaM.BeverelllC.CadotO.FugazzaM.GretherJ.M.HelbleM.NicitaA.PlemartiniR. (2012). A practical guide to trade policy analysis. New York, United States of America: United Nations Publications.
9.
BaltagiB.H.EggerP.PfaffermayrM. (2003). A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Economics Letters, 80, 391–397.
10.
BanikN.GilbertJ. (2008). Regional integration and trade costs in South Asia. Working Paper No. 127. Asian Development Bank Institute, Japan.
11.
BenedictisD.L.VicarelliC. (2004). Trade potential in gravity models. Istituto Di Studi E Analist Economica, Working Paper No. 44.
12.
BergstrandJeffrey H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481.
13.
BergstrandJeffrey H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153.
BradaJ.JoseM. (1985). Economic integration among developed, developing, and centrally planned economies: A comparative analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4), 549–556.
16.
CarbaughR.J. (2006). International economics (10th ed.). Canada: South–Western, Thompson.
17.
DayalP.DasA.BangaR.IyengarK.AhmedS. (2008). Quantification of benefits from economic cooperation in South Asia. New Delhi: Macmillan.
18.
DeardorffA. (1995). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? NBER Working Paper No. 5377, Cambridge, MA.
19.
EggerP. (2002). An econometric view on the estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentials. World Economy, 25, 297–312.
20.
EggerP. (2000). A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Economics Letters, 66, 25–31.
21.
FrankelJ.SteinE.WeiS. (1995). Trading blocs and the Americas. Journal of Development Economics, 47(1), 61–95.
22.
FrankelJ.WeiS.J. (1997). Regionalization of world trade and currencies: Economic and politics. The regionalisation of the world economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
HassanM.K. (2001). Is SAARC a viable economic block? Evidence from gravity model. Journal of Asian Economics, 12(2), 263–290.
24.
HelpmanE.KrugmanP. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
HelpmanE. (1987). Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1(1), 62–81.
26.
IsmailS. (2012). Trade induced technology spillover and economic growth: An econometric analysis. In AhmedShahidAshrafShahid (Eds), International trade in emerging economies (pp. 183–194). New Delhi: Bloomsbury.
27.
IsmailS. (2014). Growth dynamics among South Asian countries: A time series analysis. Indian Journal of Economics, XCV(377), 239–269.
28.
KienN.T. (2009). Gravity model by panel data approach: An empirical application with implications for the ASEAN free trade area. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26(3), 266–277.
29.
KrugmanP. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation and patterns of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959.
30.
KumarS.AhmedS. (2014a). Impact of sensitive lists under SAFTA: Quantitative assessment using a partial equilibrium modeling. European Journal of Globalization and Development Research, 10(1), 595–617.
31.
KumarS. (2014b).Growth and pattern of intra-industry trade between India and Bangladesh: 1975–2010.The Journal of International Economic Policy, 21(1), 5–28.
32.
LinderS. (1961). An essay on trade and transformation. New York: Wiley.
33.
LinnemanH. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
34.
MatyasL. (1997). Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. The World Economy, 20(3), 363–368.
35.
Martínez-ZarzosoI.Nowak-LehmannF.D. (2003). Augmented gravity model: An empirical application to Mercosur-European Union trade flows. Journal of Applied Economics, 6(2), 291–316.
36.
MoinuddinM. (2013). Fulfilling the promises of South Asian integration: Gravity estimation (ADBI Working Paper 415). Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
37.
MoktanS. (2008). Evaluating the intra-regional exports and trade creation and trade diversion effects of trade agreements in SAARC Countries. South Asian Economic Journal, 9(2), 233–260.
38.
NewtonI. (1687). Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Retrieved14July2014 from University of Cambridge–Cambridge Digital Library. Retrieved from http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-ADV-B
39.
OzdeserH.ErtacD. (2010). Turkey’s trade potential with euro zone countries: A gravity study. European Journal of Scientific Research, 43(1), 15–23.
40.
PusterlaF. (2007). Regional integration agreements: Impact, geography and efficiency. Inter-American IDB-SOE Working Paper No. 1. Paris: IDB-SOE.
41.
RahmanM.ShadatW.B.DasN.C. (2006). Trade potential in SAFTA: An application of augmented gravity model. CPD Occasional Paper No. 61, CPD, Dhaka.
42.
RahmanM.M. (2007). The causative factors of Bangladesh’s exports: Evidence from the gravity model analysis. In The New Zealand Association of Economists 48th Annual Conference, 27–29 June 2007, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved 7December2013, from https://eprints.usq.edu.au/2833/1/Rahman_2007_NZAEconf.pdf
43.
RajapakseP.ArunatillekeN. (1997). Would a reduction in trade barriers promote intra-SAARC trade? A Sri Lankan perspective. Journal of Asian Economics, 8(1), 95–115.
44.
Rodríguez-DelgadoJ.D. (2007). SAFTA: Living in a world of regional trade agreements. IMF Working Paper 07/23. Washington, DC: Asia and Pacific Department, International Monetary Fund.
45.
SalimR.KabirS. (2010). The immediate impact of euro on intra-regional trade: An event study approach. Journal of Economic Development, 35(3), 43–55.
46.
SamaratungaR.H.S. (1999). Essays in trade policy and economic integration with special reference to South Asia. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne.
47.
SerlengaL.ShinY. (2007). Gravity models of intra-EU trade: Application of the CCEP-HT estimation in heterogeneous panels with unobserved common time-specific factors. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 361–381.
48.
SrinivasanT.N. (1994). Regional trading arrangements and beyond: Exploring some options for South Asia, theory, empirics, and policy. Report No. DP-142. Washington, DC: World Bank.
49.
SrinivasanT.N.CanoneroG. (1995). Preferential agreements in South Asia: Theory, empirics and policy. Yale Growth Center, Yale University (Mimeo).
50.
ThoumiF. (1989). Trade flows and economic integration among the LCDs of the Caribbean Basin. Social and Economic Studies, 38(2), 215–233.
51.
TinbergenJ. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
52.
VenablesA.J. (1987). Trade and trade policy with differentiated products: A Chamberlinian-Ricardian model. Economic Journal, 97(387), 700–717.
53.
VinerJ. (1950). The customs union issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
54.
WangC.WeiY.LiuXiaming (2010). Determinants of bilateral trade flows in OECD countries: Evidence from gravity panel data models. World Economy, 33(7), 894–915.
55.
WeerahewaJ. (2009). Impact of trade facilitation measures and regional trade agreements on food and agricultural trade in South Asia (Working Paper Series, Paper No. 69). Bangkok: Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade.
