Many economists acknowledge importance of institutions in economic development of countries. It had also been proved well in historical records based on Western Europe. The present article deals with how institutional developments prevailed in India and the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) could lead to development in bilateral trade between India and the ASEAN.
AfonsoO. (2011). R&D direction and north-south diffusion, human capital, growth, and wages. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Economics Research International, Volume 2011, Article ID 401928, 14 pages.
2.
BarroRobert J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
3.
ChamberlinE. (1962). The theory of monopolistic competition. New York, NY: MIT Press.
4.
CoaseE. (1992). The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review, 82(4), 713–719.
5.
DoornikA.J. (1998). Approximations to the asymptotic distributions of cointegration tests. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(2), 573–593.
6.
DorrucciE.FirpoS.FratzscherM.MongelliF.P. (2002). European integration: What lessons for other regions? The case of Latin America. ECBWorking Paper, 185.
7.
EngleR.GrangerC. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
8.
FrankelJ.RomerD. (1999). Does trade cause growth?American Economic Review, 89(3), 379–399.
9.
FriedmanM. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. USA, University of Chicago Press.
10.
Gancia. (2008). North–south trade and directed technical change. Journal of International Economics, 76(1), 276–295.
11.
GreenawayD.MilnerC. (1989). The growth and significance of intra-industry trade causes of changes in the structure of international trade. London, Macmillan.
12.
GreenawayD.HineR.MilnerC. (1994). Country-specific factors and the pattern of horizontal and vertical intra-industry trade in the UK. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, 130(1), 77–100.
13.
GrubelH. (1970). The theory of intra-industry trade. In: McDougallI.A.SnapeedsR.H Studies. International Journal Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
HelpmanE. (1997). R&D and productivity: The international connection. NBER Working, Paper. 6101 (July).
16.
JollifeI.T. (2002). Principal component analysis. New York: Springer, 2nd edition.
17.
KaufmannD.KraayA. (2008). Governance indicators: Where are we and where should we be going?World Bank Research Observer. Springer, 2008.
18.
KaufmannD.KraayA. (2007). Growth and governance: A reply/rejoinder. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 555–562.
19.
KnackS.KeeferPh. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
20.
MurrellP. (2005). Institutions and firms in transition economies. In MenardC.ShirleyM.M. (Eds), Handbook of New Institutional Economics (pp. 667–700). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
21.
NorthDouglass C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
22.
SmithA.(1776).An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Vol.1). London: W. Strahan.
23.
VeeramaniC. (2002). Intra-industry trade of India: Trends and country-specific factors. Weltwirtschafiliches Archives, 138(3).
