Jesus of Nazareth: His Life, Times, and Teaching (New York [1925]), 355.
2.
Ib., 356-359.
3.
'To What Extent Is Jesus a Question for Jews?' (in Christians and Jews, edd. Hans Küng and Walter Kasper, New York [1974]), 68-72.
4.
Jesus (New York [1969]).
5.
'The Image of Jesus in Modern Judaism' ( Journal of Ecumenical Studies11 [1974]), 427.
6.
In addition to the works cited below cf. Israelis, Jews and Jesus (Garden City [1979]), and ' Das Leiden und Sterben Jesu von Nazaret: Versuch einer jüdischen Sinngebung' (in Exodus und Kreuz im ökumenischen Dialog zwischen Juden und Christen , ed. Hans Hermann Henrix and Martin Stöhr, Aachen [1978]), 94-106.
7.
Hans Küng and Pinchas Lapide, 'Is Jesus a Bond or Barrier?: A Jewish-Christian Dialogue' ( Journal of Ecumenical Studies14[ 1977]), 481. The text is a translation of the transcript of a discussion broadcast by Southwest German Radio on 25 August 1975.
8.
Ib., 482.
9.
Pinchas Lapide, Auferstehung: Ein jiidisches Glaubenserlebnis (Stuttgart and Munich [21978]), 50.
10.
'Is Jesus a Bond or Barrier?', 479-480, 482; 'Jüdische Theologie des Christentums' (in Pinchas Lapide, Franz Mussner and Ulrich Wilckens, Was Juden und Christen voneinander denken (Freiburg [ 1978]), 25-26.
11.
"'Auferstehung: Bemerkungen zu einem apologetischen Pamphlet' (Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte30 [1978]), 259-262.
12.
'Positionen und Probleme der Begegnung: Christliche Theologie des Judentums - Jüdische Theologie des Christentums' (Orientierung42 [ 1978]), 255-258.
13.
'Gewundene Wege der Rezeption: Zur neueren jüdischen Jesusforschung' (Herder Korrespondenz30 [1976]), 318.
14.
Der Rabbi von Nazaret (Trier [1974]), 134.
15.
Auferstehung , 77. The authors mentioned are Herbert Braun, Rudolf Bultmann, Meinrad Limbeck, Willi Marxsen, Karl Rahner and Heinz Zahrnt.
16.
Cf. Ben F. Meyer, The Aims of Jesus ( London [1979]), 68: 'This strictly eschatological understanding of resurrection was, of course, distinct from the idea of revivification of the dead as met with in the Elijah and Elisha cycles or other miracle-stories. For there the terminus ad quem was the life of this world; it was a step back into the present. The terminus ad quem of the eschatological resurrection of the dead was "the age to come". Here lay the uniqueness of the resurrection of Christ: It was a step into the future.'
17.
For examples cf. ib., 178;
18.
James P. Mackey, Jesus: The Man and the Myth (London [ 1979]),87-94,114-116;
19.
and John P. Galvin, 'The Resurrection of Jesus in Contemporary Catholic Systematics' (Heythrop Journal20 [1979]), 123-145.
20.
E.g., Leo Scheffczyk, Auferstehung: Prinzip des christ-lichen Glaubens (Einsiedeln [1976]).
21.
For an attempt to classify contemporary positions cf. John P. Galvin, ' Resurrection as Theologia crucis Jesu: The Foundational Christology of Rudolf Pesch' (Theological Studies38 [1977]). 520-522.