Abstract
In this article, I argue that Nehemiah obliquely criticizes the Achaemenid Empire’s polity over subaltern societies in Neh 5. I will first explore Homi Bhabha’s main ideas such as stereotypes, ambivalence, mimicry, and hybridity. Then, I will apply his theories to understand Nehemiah as a mimic man. Nehemiah’s hybrid identity as a Persian official and a Jew results in the mimicry of the colonized. The mimicry functions as a mockery against the Achaemenid Empire. Since Nehemiah knows the ethical statements in Darius’ testament in DNb and the Persian kings’ luxurious table, he not only appropriates the Achaemenid imperial ideology, but also criticizes the Achaemenid dynasty’s heavy taxation on the subaltern in Neh 5.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
