This article is a reflection on the ways in which scripture was approached by participants within one of the Church of England’s Shared Conversations on Human Sexuality. It notes the significance of historical-critical hermeneutical concepts within the conversation and concludes that the hermeneutical aspect of the debate on scripture and sexuality, as carried out within the context of the shared conversations, is far removed from the scholarly discussion of theological hermeneutics for which the issue of human sexuality has been a great stimulant.
AlexanderL., ‘Homosexuality and the Bible: Reflections of a Biblical Scholar’, Grace and Disagreement: Shared Conversations on Scripture, Mission and Human Sexuality: A Reader: Writings to Resource Conversation (London: Church of England, 2015), 24–51.
2.
Archbishops’ Council, Grace and Disagreement: Shared Conversations on Scripture, Mission and Human Sexuality: Thinking through the Process (London: Church of England, 2015).
3.
BartholomewC. G., ‘Uncharted Waters: Philosophy, Theology and the Crisis in Biblical Interpretation’, in BartholomewCraig G.GreeneColinMöllerKarl (eds), Renewing Biblical Interpretation, Scripture and Hermeneutics Series 1 (Grand Rapids, MI/Carlisle: Zondervan/Paternoster, 2000), 1–34.
4.
BartonJ., The Nature of Biblical Criticism (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2007).
5.
BurridgeR., Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics Today (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007).
6.
FowlS. E., Engaging Scripture: A Model for Theological Interpretation (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1998).
7.
JensonR. W., ‘Hermeneutics and the Life of the Church’, in BraatenCarl E.JensonRobert W. (eds), Reclaiming the Bible for the Church (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1995), 89–106.
8.
JowettB., ‘On the Interpretation of Scripture’, in SheaV.WhitlaW. (eds), Essays and Reviews: The 1860 Text and its Reading (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2000), 477–536.
9.
MacIntyreA., Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (London: Duckworth, 1988).
10.
MilbankJ., Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).
11.
PaulI., ‘The Case for the “Traditional” Position’, in Grace and Disagreement: Shared Conversations on Scripture, Mission and Human Sexuality: A Reader: Writings to Resource Conversation (London: Church of England, 2015), 1–23.
12.
Sandys-WunschJ.EldridgeL. ‘J. P. Gabler and the Distinction between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology: Translation, Commentary and Discussion of his Originality’, Scottish Journal of Theology33:2 (1980): 133–58.
13.
SargentB., David Being a Prophet: The Contingency of Scripture upon History in the New Testament, BZNW 207 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014).
