Promoting Ancestry as Ecodomy in Romanian Eastern Orthodox Christianity. The Role of Ancestors in Contemporary Romanian Orthodox Rhetoric

Abstract

For the most part, contemporary Romanian Orthodox spirituality is still heavily based on a rhetoric which builds on the notion of ancestry with the intention not only to provide Romanians with a safe comfort zone, but also to secure its privileges and influence over most of today’s Romanian society. In attempting to go back in history to demonstrate that the ancestry of Romanians is sufficient proof for their full and unconditional adherence to Eastern Orthodox Christianity in its local Romanian version as the Romanian Orthodox Church, most of today’s representatives of Romanian Orthodox spirituality—notably Dumitru Stăniloae, Ioan Rămureanu, and Teoctist, the former Patriarch of the Romanian Orthodox Church—focused on a rhetoric that, on the one hand, takes Romanians back to their Thracian, Dacian, and Roman ancestors, while on the other hand, seeks to inculcate the idea that an unflinching adherence to this specific ancestry, which is described as Christian by nature and birth, must be kept at all costs. Thus, this specific kind of rhetoric attempts to build a protective fence around Romanians, who are taught that they need to preserve their Eastern Orthodox Christianity and their allegiance to the Romanian Orthodox Church mostly because, since their ancestors were Christians, they are in fact born Christian. The process of building this protective wall around Romanians is described by means of the term ‘ecodomy’ and, unlike its general use in contemporary debates as focusing on positive aspects, the particular focus of the Romanian Orthodox Church on ecodomy based on the idea of ancestry is going to be revealed mostly through a chain of negative connotations. Thus, the contemporary rhetoric of the Romanian Orthodox Church based on the notion of ancestry as ecodomy—one may even call it negative ecodomy—is going to be explained in connection with three fundamental aspects, namely church, nation, and culture, all intended to preserve not only the influence of the Romanian Orthodox Church in nowadays Romanian society, but also a set of privileges in its relationship with the state.

Keywords

church nation culture Orthodox Romanian ancestry ecodomy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oldson

W. O.

(2002). ‘Alibi for Prejudice: Eastern Orthodoxy, the Holocaust, and Romanian Nationalism’. East European Quarterly 36(3): 301–311.

Repciuc

(2011). ‘The Archaic Time Perception in the Modern Times: An Ethnological Approach towards a Religious Minority’. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 10 (30): 80–101.

Rusu

E.-C

(2014). ‘On Men and Women in the Family Constellations Method’. Journal of Research in Gender Studies 4(1): 1141–1152.

Şipoș

(2008). ‘Ideology, Politics, and Religion in the Work of the Historian Silviu Dragomir’. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 7(21): 79–105.

Stăniloae

(1940). ‘Opera teologică a lui Nichifor Crainic’. Gândirea 19(4): 264–277.

Vasile

(2002). ‘The Suppression of the Romanian Greek Catholic Uniate Church’. East European Quarterly 36(3): 313–322.

Flora

Szilagyi

. (2005). ‘Church, Identity, Politics in Post-1989 Romania’. In Roudometof

Agadjanian

Pankhurst

. (eds), Eastern Orthodoxy in a Global Age. Tradition Faces the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press/Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 110–143.

Mureșan

D. I

. (2012). ‘The Romanian Tradition’. In Casiday

(ed.), The Orthodox Christian World. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 141–153.

Niculescu

G. A

. (2007). ‘Archaeology and Nationalism in The History of the Romanians’. In Kohl

P. L.

Kozelsky

Ben-Yeduda

(eds), Selective Remembrences. Archaeology in the Construction, Commemoration, and Consecration of National Pasts. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 127–162.

10.

Olteanu

de Nève

. (2014). ‘Eastern Orthodoxy and the Processes of European Integration’. In Krawchuk

Bremer

. (eds), Eastern Orthodox Encounters of Identity and Otherness. Values, Self-Reflection, Dialogue. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 179–206.

11.

Pârvu

. (1995). ‘Organizarea și dezvoltarea Bisericii Ortodoxe Române în spiritul autonomiei și autocefaliei’. In Autocefalie, patriarhie, slujire sfântă, pp. 17–66.

12.

Shapiro

P. A

. (2007). ‘Faith, Murder, Resurrection: the Iron Guard and the Romanian Orthodox Church’. In Spicer

K. P.

(ed.), Antisemitism, Christian Ambivalence, and the Holocaust. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 136–172.

13.

Tamás

(2010). ‘Parallel Coexistence of Churches. The Church in Transylvania: Its Unity and Disunity—a Contextualized Example. In van der Borght

E. A. J. G

. (ed.), The Unity of the Church: A Theological State of the Art and Beyond. Leiden: Brill, pp. 43–50.

14.

Teoctist (1995). ‘Cuvânt înainte. Patriarhatul român: dreaptă întocmire a bisericii naționale românești autocefale’. In Autocefalie, patriarhie, slujire sfântă, pp. 5–14.

15.

*** (1995). Autocefalie, patriarhie, slujire sfântă. Momente aniversare în Biserica Ortodoxă Română. București: Editura Institutului Biblic și de Misiune al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române.

16.

*** (2005). Romania. In Annual Report on International Religious Freedom 2004. Report Submitted to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the U. S. Senate and the Committee on International Relations of the U. S. House of Representatives by the Department of State in accordance with Section 102 of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

17.

Bartoș

. (2002). Deification in Eastern Orthodox Theology. An Evaluation and Critique of the Theology of Dumitru Stăniloae. Carlisle: Paternoster.

18.

Bideleux

Jeﬀries

. (2007). The Balkans. A Post-Communist History. Abingdon: Routledge.

19.

Boia

. (2001). History and Myth in Romanian Consciousness. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.

20.

Byrnes

T. A

. (2001). Transnational Catholicism in Post-Communist Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

21.

Cinpoeș

. (2010). Nationalism and Identity in Romania. A History of Extreme Politics (om the Birth of the State to EU Accession. New York, NY: Tauris Academic Studies/IB Tauris.

22.

Conradie

(2006). Christianity and Ecological Theology. Resources for Further Research. Stellenbosch: SUN Press.

23.

Dădârlat

C. M.

(1992). Acasă la Dumitru Stăniloae. București: Editura Cristal.

24.

Dutceac Segesten

(2011). Myth, Identity, and Conflict. A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian History Textbooks. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books/Rowman and Littlefield.

25.

Fairbairn

. (2002). Eastern Orthodoxy through Western Eyes. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

26.

Hitchins

. (2014). A Concise History of Romania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Mehedinți

. (1995). Creștinismul românesc. București: Editura Anastasia.

28.

Müller-Fahrenholz

. (1995). God’s Spirit. Transforming a World in Crisis. London: Continuum.

29.

Păcurariu

. (1991). Istoria Bisericii Ortodoxe Române. București: Editura Institutului Biblic și de Misiune al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române.

30.

Payne

S. G

. (1995). A History of Fascism 1914-1945. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1995.

31.

Romocea

. (2011). Church and State. Religious Nationalism and State Identification in Post- Communist Romania. London: Continuum.

32.

Roudometof

. (2014). Globalization and Orthodox Christianity. The Transformation of a Religious Tradition. New York, NY: Routledge.

33.

Stan

Turcescu

. (2007). Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

34.

Stăniloae

. (1992). Reflecții despre spiritualitatea poporului român. Craiova: Editura Scrisul Românesc 1992.

35.

Stăniloae

. (2004). Reflecții despre spiritualitatea poporului român. București: Editura Elion.

36.

Verdery

. (1999). The Political Lives of Dead Bodies. Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

37.

Taloș

V. A

. (2008). Church in the Apostolic Spirit. A Strategy for Building Indigenous Apostolic Congregations in the Cultural Context of Eastern Orthodox and Post-Communist Romania. PhD Dissertation.

38.

*** (2014). IPS Pimen: Scoaterea religiei din școli este un atentat la ființa noastră națională, la credința neamului nostr u românesc. Gândul 26 decembrie. Online: http://www.gandul.info/stiri/ips-pimen-scoaterea-religiei-din-scoli-este-un-atentat-la-fiinta-noastra-nationala-la-credinta-neamului-nostru-romanesc-13739104

39.

Aștefănesei

Nicolescu

. (2014). Curtea Constituțională schimbă regula orei de religie în școli: părinții trebuie să depună cerere pentru ca elevii să participe la această materie. Adevărul 12 noiembrie. Online: http://adevarul.ro/educatie/scoala/curtea-constitutionala-schimba-regula-orei-religie-scoli-parintii-trebuie-depuna-cerere-elevii-participe-materie-1_54637bb40d133766a8cb325c/index.html.

40.

*** (2014). The Romanian Constitution. Online: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?den=act2_2&par1=2#t2c2s0a29.

41.

*** (nd). The Ancient Church. Online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD77DRl2HGk.

42.

Biroul de Presă al Patriarhiei Române (2014). O decizie discriminatorie și umilitoare pentru ora de religie. Online: http://patriarhia.ro/o-decizie-discriminatorie-si-umilitoare-pentru-ora-de-religie-7684.html.