BiedermanG. B.DaveyV. A.RyderC., & FranchiD. (1994). The negative effects of positive reinforcement in teaching children with developmental delay. Exceptional Children, 60, 458–465.
2.
BiedermanG. B.RobertsonH. A., & VanayanM. (1986). Observational learning of two visual discrimination problems by pigeons: A within-subjects design. The Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 45–49.
3.
BiedermanG. B.RyderC.DaveyV. A., & GibsonA. (1991). Remediation strategies for developmentally delayed children: Passive vs. active modeling interventions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23, 174–182.
4.
BiedermanG. B., & VanayanM. (1988). Observational learning in pigeons: The function of quality of observed performance in simultaneous discrimination. Learning and Motivation, 19, 31–43.
5.
BlumM. L., & FoosP. W. (1986). Data gathering: Experimental method plus. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
BowerG. H., & HilgardE. R. (1981). Theories of learning (5th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
D'AmatoM. R. (1970). Experimental psychology: Methodology, psychophysics and learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
HorstG.WehmanP.HillJ. W., & BaileyC. (1981). Developing age-appropriate leisure skills in severely handicapped adolescents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14, 11–15.
9.
LovaasO. I. (1977). The autistic child. New York: Irvington.
10.
MeyerD., & KohlF. L. (1985). Teaching domestic living skills to severely handicapped students in the natural environment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 18, 38–45.
11.
RobertsonH. A., & BiedermanG. B. (1989). Modeling, imitation and observational learning in remediation experimentation 1979–1988: An analysis of the validity of research designs and outcomes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 174–197.
12.
WallanderJ. L.CongerA. J., & WardD. G. (1983). It may not be worth the effort: Trained judges' global ratings as a criterion measure of social skills and anxiety. Behavior Modification, 7, 139–149.
13.
WardP.C. (1995). It may look and sound like a reinforcer, but unless it increases the frequency and behavior it follows, it's not a reinforcer: A response to Biederman, Davey, Ryder, and Franchi. Exceptional Children, 61, 1–4.