AndersonJ. E.The nature of abilities. In TorranceE.P. (Editor), Education and talent. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1960. Pp. 9–31.
2.
deMille, R., and MerrifieldP. R. Book review of Creativity and intelligence by GetzelsJ.W. and JacksonP.W.. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962, 22, 803–808.
3.
DunnetteM. D., CampbellJ., and JaastadKay. The effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for two industrial samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1963, 47, 30–37.
4.
FlanaganJ. C.The definition and measurement of ingenuity. In TaylorC.W. and BarronF. (Editors), Scientific creativity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963. Pp. 89–98.
5.
FlandersN. A., AndersonJ. P., and AmidonE. J.Measuring dependence proneness in the classroom. Minneapolis: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Minnesota, 1960.
6.
GardnerJ. W.Renewal in societies and men. Annual report of Carnegie Corporation, 1962. Pp. 3–13.
7.
GetzelsJ. W., and JacksonP. W.Creativity and intelligence. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1962.
8.
GuilfordJ. P.Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, 5, 444–454.
9.
GuilfordJ. P.Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 1959, 14, 469–479.
10.
GuilfordJ. P., WilsonR. C., and ChrfstensenP. R.A factor-analytic study of creative thinking: II. Administration of tests and analysis of results. Los Angeles: Psychology Laboratory, University of Southern California, 1952.
11.
HarmonL. R.Criterion committee report. In TaylorC.W. (Editor), The first University of Utah research conference on the identification of creative scientific talent. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1956. Pp. 251–259.
12.
HenryJ.Spontaneity, initiative, and creativity in suburban classrooms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1959, 29, 266–279.
13.
HollandJ. L.Some limitations of teacher ratings as predictors of creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1959, 50, 219–223.
14.
MacKinnonD. W.The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 484–495.
15.
MaslowA. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50, 370–396.
16.
MeadowA., and ParnesS. J.Evaluation of training in creative problem solving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1959, 43, 189–194.
17.
OsbornA. F.Applied imagination. (Revised edition.) New York: Scribner's Sons, 1957.
18.
ParnesS. J., and MeadowA.Development of individual creative talent. In TaylorC.W. and BarronF. (Editors), Scientific creativity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963. Pp. 311–320.
19.
PepinskyPauline N.The social dialectic of productive non-conformity. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1961, 7, 128–137.
20.
President's Commission on Higher Education.Higher education for American democracy. Volume 1. Establishing goals. New York: Harper, 1947.
21.
RhodesM.An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 1961, 42, 305–310.
22.
RogersC. R.Toward a theory of creativity. In RogersC.R. (Editor), On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961. Pp. 347–359.
23.
RubinL. J.Creativity and the curriculum. Phi Delta Kappan, 1963, 44, 438–440.
24.
SprecherT. B.A proposal for identifying the meaning of creativity. In TaylorC.W. and BarronF. (Editors), Scientific creativity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963. Pp. 77–88.
25.
SuchmanJ. R.The University of Illinois studies in inquiry training. In TorranceE.P. (Editor), Creativity: third conference on gifted children. Minneapolis: Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, 1961. Pp. 67–84.
26.
TaylorC. W., and HollandJ. L.Development and application of tests of creativity. Review of Educational Research, 1962, 32, 91–102.
27.
TaylorD. W., BerryP. C., and BlockC. H.Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking?New Haven: Department of Psychology, Yale University, 1957.
28.
ThistlethwaiteD. L.The college environment as a determinant of research potentiality. In TaylorC.W. and BarronF. (Editors), Scientific creativity, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963. Pp. 265–277.
29.
ThorndikeR. L.The measurement of creativity. Teachers College Record, 1963, 64, 422–424.
30.
TorranceE. P.A preliminary analysis of the evaluative thinking of effective and ineffective teachers of experimental mathematics courses. Minneapolis: Bureau of Educational Research, University of Minnesota, 1960.
TorranceE. P.The creative personality and teachers' concepts of the ideal pupil. Paper read at National Association for Gifted Children, Chicago, April, 1962. (b)
33.
TorranceE. P.Cultural discontinuities and the development of originality of thinking. Exceptional Children, 1962, 29, 2–13. (c)
34.
TorranceE. P.Who is the underachiever?NEA Journal, 1962, 51 (8), 14–17. (d)
35.
WilsonR. C.Creativity. In HenryN.B. (Editor), Education for the gifted. Yearbook of National Society for the Study of Education, 1958, 57, Part II. Pp. 108–126.
36.
YamamotoK.Creativity and intellect: review of current research and projection. Paper read at Minnesota Psychological Association, Minneapolis, April, 1961.
37.
YamamotoK.Relationships between creative thinking abilities of teachers and achievement and adjustment of pupils. Journal of Experimental Education, 1963, 32, 3–25.
38.
YamamotoK.Creativity and sociometric choice among adolescents. Journal of Social Psychology, in press, (a)
39.
YamamotoK.Threshold of intelligence in academic achievement of highly creative students. Journal of Experimental Education, in press, (b)