CastanedaA. & WorellL.Differential relation of latency and response vigor to stimulus similarity in brightness discrimination. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 61, 309–314.
2.
FingerF. W.Quantitative studies of “conflicts”: I. Variations in latency and strength of the rat's response to a discrimination jumping situation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1941, 31, 97–127.
3.
HullC. L.Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
4.
KassN. & StevensonH. W.The effect of pretraining reinforcement conditions on learning by normal and retarded children. Amer. J. ment. Def., 1961, 66, 76–80.
5.
LipmanR. S. & GriffithB. C.Effects of anxiety level on concept formation: A test of drive theory. Amer., J. ment. Def., 1960, 65, 342–348.
6.
PalermoD. S., CastanedaA., & McCandlessB. R.The relationship of anxiety in children to performance in a complex learning task. Child Developm., 1956, 27, 379–382.
7.
SteigmanM. J., & StevensonH. W.The effect of pretraining reinforcement schedules on children's learning. Child Developm., 1960, 31, 53–58.
8.
SteigmanM. J.Discrimination conflict and level of drive. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Univer. of Texas, 1961.
9.
TaylorJ. A.Drive theory and manifest anxiety. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 303–318.
10.
TaylorJ. A. & SpenceK. W.The relationship of anxiety level to performance in serial learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1944, 44, 61–64.
11.
ZiglerE. F., HodgdenL. & StevensonH. W.The effect of support on the performance of normal and feebleminded children. J. Pers., 1958, 26, 106–122.
