The authors surveyed a national random sample of 5,837 middle school students on their attitudes toward the inclusion of peers with intellectual disabilities (ID). The national sample provided results that were accurate, with a margin of error of ± 1.4%. Findings indicated that youth (a) have limited contact with students with ID in their classrooms and school; (b) perceive students with ID as moderately impaired rather than mildly impaired; (c) believe that students with ID can participate in nonacademic classes, but not in academic classes; (d) view inclusion as having both positive and negative effects; and (e) do not want to interact socially with a peer with ID, particularly outside school. Structural equation modeling showed that youths' perceptions of the competence of students with ID significantly influence their willingness to interact with these students and their support of inclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BakJ. J.SipersteinG. N. (1987). Effects of mentally retarded children's behavioral competence on non-retarded peers' behaviors and attitudes: Toward establishing ecological validity in attitude research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 92, 31–39.
3.
BaldwinW. K. (1958). The social position of the educable mentally retarded child in the regular grades in the public schools. Exceptional Children, 25, 106–108, 112.
4.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In BollenJ.LongJ. Scott (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
BruininksR. H.RyndersJ. E.GrossJ. C. (1974). Social acceptance of mildly retarded pupils in resource rooms and regular classes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 377–383.
6.
BunchG.ValeoA. (2004). Student attitudes toward peers with disabilities in inclusive and special education schools. Disability and Society, 19, 61–76.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
EspositoB. G.ReedT. M. (1986). The effects of contact with handicapped persons on young children's attitudes. Exceptional Children, 53, 224–229.
9.
FisherD. (1999). According to their peers: Inclusion as high school students see it. Mental Retardation, 37, 458–467.
10.
GoodmanH.GottliebJ.HarrisonR. H. (1972). Social acceptance of EMRs integrated into a nongraded elementary school. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 412–417.
11.
GottliebJ.SipersteinG. N. (1976). Attitudes toward mentally retarded persons: Effects of attitude referent specificity. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 376–381.
12.
HastingsR. P.Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S.RemingtonB. (1993). An analysis of labels for people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 463–465.
13.
HelmstetterE.PeckC. A.GiangregoM. F. (1994). Outcomes of interactions with peers with moderate to severe disabilities: A statewide survey of high school students. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 263–276.
14.
HemphillL. E.SipersteinG. N. (1990). Conversational competence and peer response to mildly retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 128–134.
15.
HughesC.RodiM. S.LordenS. W.PitkinS. E.DererK. R.HwangB. (1999). Social interactions of high school students with mental retardation and their general education peers. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 104, 533–544.
16.
JohnsonG. O. (1950). A study of the social position of mentally-handicapped children in the regular grades. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 55, 60–89.
17.
JonesR. L.GottfriedN. W.OwensA. (1966). The social distance of the exceptional: A study at the high school level. Exceptional Children, 32, 551–556.
18.
KarnilowiczW.SparrowW. A.ShrinkfieldA. J. (1994). High school students' attitudes toward performing social behaviors with mentally retarded and physically disabled peers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 65–80.
19.
KishtonJ.WidamanK. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.
20.
KrajewskiJ. J.FlahertyT. (2000). Attitudes of high school students toward individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 38, 154–162.
21.
KrajewskiJ. J.HydeM. S. (2000). Comparison of teen attitudes toward individuals with mental retardation between 1987 and 1998: Has inclusion made a difference?. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 284–293.
22.
KrajewskiJ. J.HydeM. S.O'KeefeM. K. (2002). Teen attitudes toward individuals with mental retardation from 1987 to 1998: Impact of respondent gender and school variables. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 27–39.
23.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.
24.
ManettiM.SchneiderB. H.SipersteinG. N. (2001). Social acceptance of children with mental retardation: Testing the contact hypothesis with an Italian sample. Journal of Behavior Development, 25, 279–286.
25.
McCaugheyT. J.StrohmerD. C. (2005). Prototypes as an indirect measure of attitudes toward disability groups. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48, 89–99.
26.
McDougallJ.DeWitD. J.KingG.MillerL. T.KillipS. (2004). High school-aged youths' attitudes toward their peers with disabilities: The role of school and student interpersonal factors. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 51, 287–313.
27.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2006). Mplus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
28.
NowickiE. A. (2006). A cross-sectional multivariate analysis of children's attitudes toward disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 335–348.
29.
NowickiE. A.SandiesonR. (2002). A meta-analysis of school-age children's attitudes towards persons with physical or intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49, 243–265.
30.
SabornieE. J.KauffmanJ. M. (1987). Assigned, received, and reciprocal social status of adolescents with and without mild mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 139–149.
31.
SipersteinG. N. (1980). Adjective checklist (ACL) and friendship activity scale (FAS): Instruments for measuring children's attitudes. Boston: Center for Social Development and Education, University of Massachusetts.
32.
SipersteinG. N.BakJ. J. (1980). Students' and teachers' perceptions of the mentally retarded child. In GottliebJ. (Ed.), Educating mentally retarded persons in the mainstream (pp. 207–230). Baltimore: University Park.
33.
SipersteinG. N.BakJ. J. (1985a). Effects of social behavior on children's attitudes toward their mildly and moderately mentally retarded peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 319–327.
34.
SipersteinG. N.BakJ. J. (1985b). Understanding factors that affect children's attitudes toward mentally retarded peers. In MeiselC. J. (Ed.), Mainstreaming handicapped children: Outcomes, controversies, and new discoveries (pp. 55–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
SipersteinG. N.BakJ. J.O'KeefeP. (1988). Relationship between children's attitudes toward and their social acceptance of mentally retarded peers. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 93, 24–27.
36.
SipersteinG. N.ChatillonA. C. (1982). Importance of perceived similarity in improving children's attitudes toward mentally retarded peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 453–458.
37.
SipersteinG. N.LeffertJ. S.Wenz-GrossM. (1997). The quality of friendships between children with and without mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 102, 55–70.
38.
SipersteinG. N.NorinsJ.MohlerA. (2006). Social acceptance and attitude change: Fifty years of research. In JacobsonJ. W.MulickJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities. (pp. 133–154). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
39.
SliningerD.SherrillC.JankowskiC. M. (2000). Children's attitudes toward peers with severe disabilities: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 176–196.
40.
StainbackW. C.StainbackS. B. (1982). Non-handicapped students' perceptions of severely handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 177–182.
41.
StrauchJ. D. (1970). Social contact as a variable in the expressed attitudes of normal adolescents toward EMR pupils. Exceptional Children, 36, 495–500.
42.
TownsendM. A.WiltonK. M.VakiliradT. (1993). Children's attitudes toward peers with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37, 405–411.
43.
WiselyD. W.MorganS. B. (1981). Children's ratings of peers presented as mentally retarded and physically handicapped. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 281–286.
44.
WolfbergP. J.ZercherC.LieberJ. (1999). “Can I play with you?” Peer culture in inclusive preschool programs. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 69–84.
45.
WolraichM. L.SipersteinG. N. (1983). Assessing professionals' prognostic impressions of mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 21, 8–12.
46.
ZetlinA. G.MurtaughM. (1988). Friendship patterns of mildly learning handicapped and nonhandicapped high school students. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 447–454.
