The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides parents of students with disabilities the opportunity to obtain an independent educational evaluation (IEE) if the parent disagrees with the evaluation conducted by the local education agency. The standard for determining the parent's right to a publicly funded IEE is the appropriateness of the district's evaluation. Yet guidelines for determining the appropriateness of the district's evaluation have not been clearly defined. A qualitative content analysis of recent administrative decisions and cases concerning IEEs identified three legal criteria administrative officers and judges have utilized in determining the appropriateness of challenged district evaluations. Several recommendations to professionals involved in conducting evaluations are offered, including a self-study and ongoing case review.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA Publications.
2.
American Psychological Association (APA)(1992). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved September 8, 2000, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code.html.
Big Spring Sch. Dist., 29 IDELR 629 (SEA PA 1998).
8.
Board of Educ. of the Shenendehowa Central Sch. Dist., 28 IDELR 670 (SEA NY 1998).
9.
Board of Educ. of the Troy Sch. Dist., 27 IDELR 566 (SEA MI 1997).
10.
Board of Educ. of the Valley Stream 13 Union Free Sch., 25 IDELR 1027 (SEA NY 1997).
11.
Board of Educ. of the Wappingers Central Sch. Dist., 27 IDELR 992 (SEA NY 1998).
12.
CanterA.DesrochersJ. (2001). Independent educational evaluations: Implications of IDEA regulations. Retrieved February 19, 2001, from the National Mental Health and Education Center Web site: http://www.naspcenter.org/teachers/IDEA_iee.html.
Dare County Pub. Schs., 27 IDELR 547 (SEA NC 1997).
24.
Davila to Kerry, 18 IDELR 527 (OSERS, August 5, 1991).
25.
Davila to Smith, 16 EHLR 1080A (OSERS, May 30, 1990).
26.
Douglas County Sch. Dist. Re-1, 32 IDELR 188 (SEA CO 1999).
27.
Eastern Lebanon County Sch. Dist., 34 IDELR 190 (SEA PA 2000).
28.
Fallbrook Union Elementary Sch. Dist., 28 IDELR 678 (SEA CA 1998).
29.
FreedmanM. K. (1996a). IEEs: Who's right, and when?The Special Educator, 12 (1). Retrieved January 12, 2001, from http://www.lrp.com.
30.
FreedmanM. K. (1996b). Independent Educational Evaluations (IEE): Love ‘em or hate ‘em, but do them right! Materials from the 16th National Institute on Legal issues of Educating Individuals With Disabilities. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.*
31.
FreedmanM. K. (1996c). What you should do with IEEs. The Special Educator, 11 (13). Retrieved April 28, 1999 from http://www.lrp.com.
32.
G. D. v. Westmoreland Sch. Dist., 17 EHLR 751 (1st Cir. 1991).
Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist., 26 IDELR 618 (SEA CA 1997).
55.
Manhattan Beach Unified Sch. Dist. and Southwest SELPA, 26 IDELR 457 (SEA CA 1997).
56.
Marple Newtown Sch. Dist., 34 IDELR 222 (SEA PA 2001).
57.
Mount Greylock Regional Schs., 26 IDELR 1238 (SEA MA 1997).
58.
Mount Horeb Area Sch. Dist., 25 IDELR 286(SEA WI 1997).
59.
National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) (2000). Guidelines for the Provision of School Psychological Services. Bethesda, MD: NASP Publications.
60.
National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) (2000). Principles for Professional Ethics. Bethesda, MD: NASP Publications.
61.
Necedah Sch. Dist., 34 IDELR 166 (SEA WI 2001).
62.
North Chicago Community Unit. Sch. Dist., 34 IDELR 25 (SEA IL 2000).
63.
Northview Pub. Sch., 21 IDELR 694 (SEA MI 1994).
64.
Norton v. Orinda Union Sch. Dist., 29 IDELR 1068 (9th Cir, 1999).
65.
Old Adobe Union Elem. Sch. Dist., 27 IDELR 70 (SEA CA 1997).
