Many neighborhoods in contemporary Brazilian cities, known as condomínios exclusivos (CE) (exclusive condominiums), are surrounding themselves with walls or fences and using security gates to control access. By reinforcing spatial differentiation, turning inwards, and avoiding the rest of the city, CEs are dramatically affecting urban form. This article describes our study of an important aspect of the Brazilian CE phenomenon: specifically, satisfaction among CE residents. We used a structured questionnaire to study residential satisfaction in one CE. Not surprisingly, residents are highly satisfied with living in a CE. However, the reasons why they moved into the CE do not coincide with why they like living there now. Three main factors that predict residential satisfaction in CEs are their: a) location, b) safety, and c) unique characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albuquerque Takaoka (n.d.). Marketing material for Alphaville, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
2.
Albuquerque Takaoka. (1989). Marketing material for Alphaville Residencial 11, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
3.
Altman, I. , & Chemers, M. M. (1990). Culture and environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Anderson, J. R. , Anthony, K. H., Weidemann, S., Bain, B., & Allen, L. (1988). Housing for physically disabled adults: User experience with alternate bathroom designs. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Housing Research and Development Program.
5.
Anderson, J. R. , & Weidemann, S. (1980). Planning for change in multifamily housing. In R. Thorne & S. Arden (Eds.), People and the man made environment (pp. 116-135). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
6.
Anthony, K. H. (1981). International house: Home away from home? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Architecture.
7.
Anthony, K. H. , Weidemann, S., & Chin, Y. (1990). Housing perceptions of low-income single parents. Environment and Behavior, 22(2), 147-182.
8.
Associated Press . (1993, Feb. 2). Life behind barricades: The new U.S. community. St Petersburg Times, p. 1A.
9.
Bell, C. (1991, Feb. 21). Alpharetta rejects bid for guarded-gate community. Atlanta Journal Constitution, p. H8.
10.
Bellalta-Moriarty, J.M.P. (1988). Residents' preferences and perceptions of private open space in multi-family housing. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Landscape Architecture.
11.
Blakely, E. (1994, January). Fortress America [Viewpoint]. Planning, 60(1), 46.
12.
Blakely, E. , & Snyder, M. G. (1995). Fortress America: Gated and walled communities in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
13.
Bonduki, N. G. (1983). Habitaćão popular: Contribuição para o estudo da evolução urbana de Sao Paulo. In L. P. Valladares (Ed.), Debates Urbanos (Vol. 3) Repensando a Habitação no Brasil (pp. 135-168). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Zahar.
14.
Bonnes, M. , Bonaiuto, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1991). Crowding and satisfaction in the urban environment: A contextual approach. Environment and Behavior, 23(5), 531-552.
15.
Caldeira, T.PRR. (1992). City of walls: Crime, segregation, and citizenship in Sao Paulo. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Anthropology.
16.
Campbell, A. , Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
Carvalho, M. (1994). Residential satisfaction in gate-guarded neighborhoods: The Baytowne study. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Urban and Regional Planning.
18.
Carvalho, M. (1995). Residential satisfaction in condomínios exclusivos (gate-guarded neighborhoods) in Brazil [abstract]. In J. L. Nasar, P. Grannis, & K. Hanyu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (p. 169). Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA.
19.
Cauley, H. M. (1993, May 16). Post Renaissance: Intown community promotes security and neighborliness. Atlanta Journal Constitution [Homefinder], p. 46.
20.
Cheslow, J. (1996, January 21). Country roads lead to gated community. The New York Times, p. 5.
21.
Chin, Y. C. (1987). Residents' perceptions of neighbors in two types of married student housing: An empirical test of a conceptual model. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Landscape Architecture.
22.
Chin, Y. C. (1990). Resident housing satisfaction in multi-family housing environments in Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Urban and Regional Planning.
23.
Choay, F. (1979). 0 urbanismo: Utopias e realidades [The Urbanism: Utopias and realities]. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Perspectiva.
24.
Cisneros, H. G. (1995). Defensible space: Deterring crime and building community. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
25.
Clark, C. S. (1993). Suburban crime [Special Issue]. Congressional Quarterly Inc., 3(33).
26.
Cooper, C. (1976). The house as symbol of self. In H. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environment psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 435-448). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
27.
Cooper, C. (1995). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.
28.
Corwin, M. (1992, March 15). Low-income project gets chic security. Los Angeles Times, pp. B1, B5.
29.
Cutter, S. (1982). Residential satisfaction and the suburban homeowner. Urban Geography, 3(4), 315-327.
30.
Davis, E. E. , & Davis, M. F. (1981). Predictors of satisfaction with housing and neighborhood: A nationwide study in the Republic of Ireland. Social Indicators Research, 9, 477-494.
31.
Davis, M. (1992). Fortress Los Angeles: The militarization of urban space. In M. Sorkin, (Ed.), Variations on a theme park (pp. 154-180). New York: Hill Ewang—The Noonday Press.
32.
Donahue, J. (1994). Resident planned communities: The development of co-housing in the United States. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
33.
Edwards, H. R. (1993). The role of the residential environment in defining quality of life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Urban and Regional Planning.
34.
Folha de Sao Paulo Atlas Geográfico Mundial. (1994). Sao Paulo: Empresa Folha da manhã.
35.
Francescato, G. , Weidemann, S., Anderson, J. R., & Chenoweth, R. (1979). Residents' satisfaction in HUD-assisted housing: Design and management factors. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
36.
Fulton, W. (1993). Fortress California. California Lawyer, 3(9), 22-23.
37.
Government by the nice, for the nice. (1992, July 25). The Economist, pp. 25-26.
38.
Gray, C. (1995, Dec. 22). Gated community on Kenner horizon. Times-Picayune, p. B4.
39.
Greene, B. (1995, Nov. 20). The elusive sense of community behind the gates. Chicago Tribune, sec. 5, p. 1.
Ha, M. , & Weber, M. J. (1994). Residential quality and satisfaction: Toward developing residential quality indexes. Home Economics Research Journal, 22(3), 296-308.
42.
Jaccard J. , Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences (Vol. 72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Lansing, J. , Marans, R., & Zehner, R. (1970). Planned residential environments. Ann Arbor, Ml: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
44.
Lee, B. A. , & Guest, A. M. (1983). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: A metropolitan analysis. The Sociological Quarterly, 24(2), 287-303.
45.
Levy-Leboyer, C. , & Ratiu, E. (1993). The need for space and residential satisfaction. Architecture & Behavior, 9(4), 475-490.
46.
Marans, R. , & Rodgers, W. (1975). Toward an understanding of community satisfaction. In A. Hawley & V. Rock (Eds.). Metropolitan America in contemporary perspectives (pp. 299-352). New York: Halsted Press.
47.
Marans, R. , & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1981). Evaluating built environments: A behavioral approach. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research and the Architectural Research Laboratory, University of Michigan.
48.
Mariano, A. (1994, April 9). Enclosed communities: Havens, or worse?Washington Post, p. E1.
49.
Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: MacMillan Company.
51.
Newman, O. (1992). Improving the viability of two Dayton communities: Five Oaks and Dunbar Manor. Great Neck, NY: The Institute for Community Design Analysis.
52.
O'Brien, D. J. , & Ayidiya, S. (1991). Neighborhood community and life satisfaction. Journal of the Community Development Society, 22(1), 21-37.
53.
O'Neill, M.M.V. (1986). Condominios exclusivos: Um estudo de caso [Exclusive condominiums: A case-study]. Revista Brasileira de Geografia, 48(1), 63-81.
54.
Pertman, A. (1994, March 14). Home, safe home: Closed communities grow. Boston Globe, sec. 1, p. 2.
55.
Potter, J. J. , & Speicher, K. E. (1995). Predicting residential satisfaction. In J. L. Nasar, P. Grannis, & K. Hanyu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 98-107). Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA.
56.
Sanford, J. (1984). Designing for privacy, community and control in urban mobile home neighborhoods. In D. Duerk & D. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 150-155). Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA.
57.
Santos, C.N.F. II (1981). Condominios exclusivos-O que diria a respeito um arqueólogo? [Condomínios Exclusivos-What would an archeologist say about that?]. Revista de Administração Municipal, 28(160), 6-29.
58.
Soto, L. (1995, Sep. 17). `Locking the criminal out': Town's residents find safe haven in a walled enclave. Atlanta Journal Constitution, p. F4.
59.
Torrance, K. (1993, Nov. 20). Subdivision just wants to be alone. Atlanta Journal Constitution, pp. J1, J6.
60.
Urbina-Soria, J. , Mejia, M. L., & Moreno, Y. R. (1991). Psychological needs in housing: An evaluation of noise and privacy in the largest low income housing complex in Mexico. In J. Urbina-Soria, P. Ortega Andeane, & R. Bechtel (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 76-80). Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA.
61.
Vendem-se casas [Houses for sale] (1987, Oct. 4). 0 Estado de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
62.
Walker, T. (1992, December 17). Growing fear of crime changing life in suburbia. Atlanta Journal Constitution, p. H3.
63.
Weidemann, S. , & Anderson, J. R. (1985). A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home Environment (pp. 153-182). New York: Plenum.
64.
Weidemann, S. , Anderson, J. R., Butterfield, D. I., & O'Donnell, P. M. (1982). Residents' perceptions of satisfaction and safety: A basis for change in multifamily housing. Environment and Behavior, 14(6), 695-724.
65.
Weidemann, S. , Anderson, J. R., O'Donnell, P. M., & Butterfield, D. I. (1981). Resident safety: Research and recommendations for Longview Place anti-crime program. Urbana-Champaign: Housing Research and Development Program, University of Illinois.
