Housing adjustment models theorize that demographic and personality characteristics of families combine to explain residentfal satisfaction. This article reports the operationalization of several personality characteristics. The Leford Test of Tenant Locus of Control, measures of household planning styles, an index measuring willingness to work to improve residential conditions, an index measuring participation in community activities, measures of expected and of experienced discrimination, and selected demographic characteristics are hypothesized to predict residential satisfaction. Two components of residential satisfaction, housing and neighborhood, are tested in separate regression models. The results suggest that personality characteristics are powerful predictors of housing satisfaction, whereas residental characterstics, feeling safe, and having friends in the neighborhood are powerful predictors of neighborhood satisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahlbrant, R. S. , & Brophy, R C. (1976). Management an important element in the housing environment. Environment and Behavior, 8, 505-526.
2.
Ahrentzen, S. (1991). Overview of housing for single-parent households. In K. Franck & S. Ahrentzen (Eds.), Newhousing and newhousing (pp. 143-160). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3.
Anthony, K. H. , Weidemann, S., & Chin, Y. (1990). Housing perceptions of low-income single parents. Environment and Behavior, 22(2), 147-182.
4.
Beard, D. , & Firebaugh, F. (1978). Morphostatic and morphogenic planning behavior in families: Development of a measurement instrument. Home Economics Research Joumal, 6, 192-205.
5.
Buehler, C. , & Hogan, M. J. (1986). Planning styles in single-parents families. Home Economics Research Joumal, 14(4), 352-362.
6.
Cook, C. , Vogel-Heffeman, M., Lukermann, B., Pugh, S., & Wattenberg, E. (1988). Expanding opportunities for single parents through housing: Guidelines fornewand existing housing and neighborhoods that meet the needs of single-parent families. Minneapolis: School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota.
7.
Cox, M. J. (1983). Economic support of children following divorce: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. In J. Cassidy (Ed.), The parental child-support obligation (pp. 157-171). Lexington, MA: Lexington.
8.
Crull, S. R. , Bode, M. E., & Morris, E. W. (1991). Two tests of the housing adjustment model of residential mobility. Housing and Society, 18(3), 53-64.
9.
Fava, S. F. (1985). Residential preferences in the suburban era: Anew look?Sociological Focus, 18(2), 109-117.
10.
Francescato, G. , Weidemann, S., Anderson, J. R., & Chenoweth, R. (1979). Residents' satisfaction in HUD-assisted housing: Design and management factors. Washington, DC: Govemment Printing Office.
11.
Franck, K. (1988). Women's housing and neighborhood needs. In E. Huttman & W. van Vilet (Eds.), Handbook of housing and the built environment in the United States (pp. 283-300). New York: Greenwood.
12.
Lachman, M. E. (1985). Personal efficacy in middle and old age: Differential and normative pattems of change. In G. H. Elder, Jr. (Ed.), Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968-1980. Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.
13.
LeBrasseur, R. , Blackford, K., & Whissell, C. (1988). The Leford Test of Tenant Locus of Control: Introducing an effective measure of relating locus of control and housing satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 20(3), 300-319.
14.
Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Edbaum.
15.
Love, D. F. (1993). Residential satisfaction: A study of nonmetropolitan single-parent women. Unpublished master's thesis, Iowa State University, Ames.
16.
McLanahan, S. S. (1984). Life events and psychological well-being: A reexaminafion of theorefical and methodological issues. Social Science Research, 13, 111-128.
17.
McLanahan, S. S. (1989). The two faces of divorce: Women's and children's interests (IRP Discussion Papers No. 903-89). Madison: University of Wisconsin, the Insfitute for Research on Poverty.
18.
McLanahan, S. , & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfacfion. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Morris, E. W. , Crull, S. R., & Winter, M. (1976). Housing norms, housing satisfaction, and the propensity to move. Joumal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 309-320.
21.
Morris, E. W. , & Winter, M. (1975). A theory of family housing adjustment. Joumal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 79-87.
22.
Morris, E. W. , & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family, and society. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1993). Housing, family, and society (2nd. ed.). Unpublished manuscript.
24.
Priemus, H. (1986). Housing as a social adaptation process. Environmentand Behavior, 18(1), 31-52.
25.
Quercia, R. G. , & Rohe, W. M. (1993). Models of housing adjustment and their implicafions for planning policy. Joumal of Planning Literature, 8(1), 20-31.
26.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectations for intemal versus extemal control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1-20.
27.
Shlay, A. B. (1993). Family self-sufficiency and housing. Housing Policy Debate, 4(3), 457-495.
28.
Sohoni, N. K. (1993, Spring). The changing family and women's issues in the 1990s. Feminist Issues, pp. 55-76.
29.
Spain, D. (1990). Housing quality and affordability among female householders. In D. Meyers (Ed.), Housing demography: Structure and housing markets (pp. 86-108) Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
30.
Sprague, J. F. (1991). More than housing: Lifeboats for women and children. Boston: Butterworth Architecture.
31.
Stone, M. E. (1993). Shelter poverty: New ideas on housing affordability. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
32.
Tumer, J. C. (1976). Housing by people: Toward autonomy in building environments. New York: Pantheon.
33.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1990). Current population reports: How we're changing (Series, P-23, No. 170). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
34.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1993). Census of population social and economic characteristics: Iowa (1990 CP-2-17). Washington, DC: Govemment Prnting Office.
35.
Weidermann, S. , Anderson, J., Butterfield, D., & O'Donnell, P. (1982). Residents' perception of satisfacfion and safety: A basis for change in mulftfamily housing. Environment and Behavior, 14(6), 695-724.
36.
Winter, M. , & Morris, E. W. (1982). Housing conditions, satisfaction, and conventionality: An analysis of the housing of female-headed household. Housing and Society, 9(2), 70-86.
