Inhabitants' relationships with their urban environment in a large (Rome) versus a small (Lecce) Italian city are compared by a multiplace analysis. The inhabitanV city relationship is studied first at the intraplace and then at the interplace level of analysis with reference to three urban places: the neighborhood, the center, and the periphery. According to the place-theory, which assumes activity to be one of the main constitutive components of place, activities performed by two samples of 434 inhabitants (Rome) and 120 inhabitants (Lecce) were taken into consideration. Each resident was asked to complete a structured questionnaire and to state how often he or she performed each of the listed activities in the three main places considered. Both the intraplace and the interplace analysis have pointed out some general and some other specific features that equalize or differentiate the inhabitant/city relationship according to city size. They refer to the way the city tends to be built up as a multiplace system in the residents' experience through their systems of activity, and as a function of their sociodemographic charactenstics such as age and sex. On the whole, small city inhabitants tend to have: (a) more integrated urban experences between different places and between home and neighborhood; (b) higher relevance of interpersonal socialization activities, especially in the neighborhood; and (c) urban activities and conditions characterized by less urban isolation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I. (1986). Theoretical issues in environmental psychology. Paper presented at the 21 st IMP Congress, Jerusalem.
2.
Altman, I. , & Chemers, M. M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3.
Altman, I. , & Gauvain, M. (1981). Across-cultural and dialectic analysis of homes. In L. Liben, A. Patterson, & N. Newcomb (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life-span: Theory and application (pp. 282-320). New York: Brooks/Cole.
4.
Amato, ft R. (1980). City size, sidewalk density, and friendliness toward strangers. Joumal of Social Psychology, 111(1), 151-152.
5.
Amato, ft R. (1983). The helpfulness of urbanites and small town dwellers: A test between two broad theoretical positions. Australian Joumal of Psychology, 35(2), 233-243.
6.
Appelbaum, R. P. (1976). City size and urban life: A preliminary inquiry into some consequences of growth in American cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 12(2), 139-149.
7.
Archer, D. , Gartner, R., Akert, R., & Lockwood, T. (1978). Cities and homicide: A new look at an old paradox. Comparative Studies in Sociology, 1, 73-95.
8.
Bonnes, M. (Ed.) (1984). Mobilizing scientists, planners and the local community in a large-scale urban situation: The Rome case study. In F. Di Castri, F.W.G. Baker, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Ecology in practice (Part II, pp. 53-62). Paris and Dublin: UNESCO and Tycooly.
9.
Bonnes, M. (Ed.) (1987). UNESCO programme on man and the biosphere, MAB Italia Project 11 urban ecologyapplied to the cityof Rome (Progress Report No. 3). Rome: Istituto di Psicologia del CNR.
10.
Bonnes, M. (Ed.) (1991). UNESCO programme on man and the biosphere, MAB Italia Project 11 urban ecologyapplied to the cityof Rome (Progress Report No. 4). Rome: MAltalia and CNR.
11.
Bonnes, M., & Mazzotta, A. R. (1995). La piccola citta come "sistema multi-luogo" (The small city as "multiplace system"). Rassegna di Psicologia, 3(12), 9-42.
12.
Bonnes, M. , & Secchiaroli, G. (1983). Space and meaning of the city-center cognition: An interactional-transactional approach. Human Relations, 36(1), 23-36.
13.
Bonnes, M. , & Secchiaroli, G. (1995). Environmental psychology: A psychosocial introduction. London: Sage. (Originally published in Italian in 1992)
14.
Bonnes, M. , Mannetti, L., Secchiaroli, G., & Tanucci, G. (1990). The city as a multiplace system: An analysis of people-urban environment transactions. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 10(1), 37-65.
15.
Bonnes, M. , Secchiaroli, G., & Mazzotta, A. R. (1992). The home as an urban place: Interplace perspective on person-home relationship. In M. V. Giuliani (Ed.), Home: Social, temporal and spatial aspects (pp. 199-214). San Giuliano Milanese, Italy: Progetto Finalizzato Edilizia.
16.
Bonnes, M. , Secchiaroli, G., & Rullo, G. (1987). Quarter, center, periphery in the city of Rome: From the inhabitants' cognitions to the usocial imageability" of urban places. In M.Bonnes (Ed.), UNESCO programme on man and the biosphere, MAB Italia Project 11 urban ecology applied to the city of Rome (Progress Report No. 3) (pp. 235-273). Rome: Istituto di Psicologia del CNR.
17.
Bornstein, M. H. , & Bornstein, H. G. (1976). The pace of life. Nature, 259, 557-559.
18.
Boyden, S. (1984). Integrated studies of cities considered as ecological systems. In F. Di Castri, F.W.G. Baker, & M. Hadley (Eds.), Ecology in practice (Part II, pp. 7-29). Paris and Dublin: UNESCO and Tycooly.
19.
Boyden, S. , Millar, S., Newcomb, K., & O'Neill, B. (1981). The ecology of a city and its people: The case of Hong Kong. Canberra: ANU Press.
20.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
22.
Canter, D. (1986). Putting situations in their place: Foundations for a bridge between social and environmental psychology. In A. Fumham (Ed.), Social behaviorin context (pp. 208-239). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Canter, D. (1988). Action and place: An existentfal dialectic. In D. Canter, M. Krampen, & D. Stea (Eds.), Environmental perspectives. Ethnoscapes: Volume 1 (pp. 1-17). Aldershot: Gower.
24.
Clemente, F. , & Kleiman, M. B. (1977). Fear of crime in the United States: A multivariate analysis. Social Forces, 56(2), 519-531.
25.
Dahmann, D. C. (1983). Subjective assessment of neighborhood quality by size of place. Urban Studies, 20(1), 31-45.
26.
Di Castri, F. , Baker, F.W.G., & Hadley, M. (Eds.). (1984). Ecology in practice. Paris and Dublin: UNESCO and Tycooly.
27.
Diekmann, A., & Klein, T. (1991). Bestimmungsgrunde des ehescheidungsrisikos: Eine empirische untersuchung mit den daten des soziookonomischen panels (Social determinants of the risk of divorce: An empirical analysis of socioeconomic panel data). KolnerZeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43(2), 271-290.
28.
Finifter, A. W. , & Abramson, R R. (1975). City size and feelings of political competence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(2), 189-198.
29.
Giacomini, V. (1981). Rome considered as an ecological system. Nature and Resources, 17(1), 13-19.
30.
Haworth, C. T. , Long, J. E., & Rasmussen, D. W. (1978). Income distribution, city size, and urban growth. Urban Studies, 15(1), 1-7.
31.
Hoch, I. (1972). Income and city size. Urban Studies, 9(3), 299-328.
32.
Holahan, C. J. (1986). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 381-407.
33.
Kammann, R. , Thomson, R., & Irwin, R. (1979). Unhelpful behavior in the street: City size or immediate pedestrian density?Environment and Behavior, 11(2), 245-250.
34.
Kim, S. (1991). Heterogeneity of labor markets and city size in an open spatial economy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21(1), 109-126.
35.
Lebart, L. , & Morineau, A. (1982). SPAD. Paris: CESIA.
36.
Mieszkowski, P. , & Smith, B. (1991). Analyzing urban decentralization: The case of Houston. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21(2), 183-199.
37.
Mouritzen, P. E. (1989). City size and citizens' satisfaction: Two competing theories revisited. European Joumal of Political Research, 17(6), 661-688.
38.
Peek, C. W. , & Lowe, G. D. (1977). Wirth, whiskey, and WASPs: Some consequences of community size for alcohol use. Sociological Quarterly, 18 (2), 209-222.
39.
Proshansky, H. , Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
40.
Rapoport, A. (1990). System of activities and system of settings. In S. Kent (Ed.), Domestic architecture and the use of space (pp. 159-176). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Russell, J. A. , & Ward, L. M. (1982). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 651-688.
42.
Shaffer, R. A. (1979). The frequency of contact with family and friends in an urban environment. Califomia Sociologist, 2(2), 181-199.
43.
Soroka, L. A. (1984). City size and income distributions: The Canadian experience. Urban Studies, 21(4), 359-366.
44.
Stokols, D. (1981). Group x place transactions: Some neglected issues in psychological research on settings. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situation: An interactional perspective (pp. 393-415). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Vester, F. , & von Hesler, A. (1980). UNESCO-M.A.B. Project 11. Ecology and planning in metropolitan areas: The "sensitivity model". Bonn, Germany: Federal Minister of the Interior.
46.
Walmsley, D. J. , & Lewis, G. J. (1989). The pace of pedestrian flows in cities. Environment and Behavior, 21(2), 123-150.
