Four experiments examined the attributional consequences of engaging in conservation-oriented behavior. Based on symbolic interactionist and self-presentational theory, it was hypothesized that behaviors associated with resource conservation would tend to affect the perceived status of the performer and would lead to systematic attributions regarding the performers identity. In the three initial experiments, each manipulating a different conservation behavior, subjects were asked to judge the identity of a target person based on a description of the targets activities. Results indicated that stereotypes regarding the identity of people who engaged in the manipulated conservation-oriented behaviors were widely shared. Further, the performance of these particular energy conservation behaviors was found to stigmatize the target by lowering the target's perceived status and by negatively influencing other dimensions of identity. A final study explored the perceived appropriateness of engaging in particular conservationist activities given specific self-presentational concerns. The data revealed considerable inter subject agreement as to the appropriateness of such behavior in situations in which the goal is to convey a specific image of the self to a social audience. The research suggests that the self-presentational connotations of conservation-oriented activities may be important determinants of their performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldassare, M. , & Katz, C. (1992). The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 24, 602-616.
2.
Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
3.
Bruner, J. S. , & Tagurd, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 634-654). Reading, MA: Addson-Wesley.
4.
Burn, S. M. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 611-629.
5.
Burn, S. M. , & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29-41.
6.
Cialdini, R. B. , Borden, R. J., Thome, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking In reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.
7.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Social nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
8.
Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conductNew York: Modern Library.
9.
Fussell, P. (1983). Class. New York: Ballentine.
10.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
11.
Gonzales, M. H. , Aronson, E., & Costanzo, M. A. (1988). Using social cognition and persuasion to promote energy conservation: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1045-1066.
12.
Haire, M. (1950). Projective techniques in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 14, 649-652.
13.
Hogan, R. (1979). Of rituals, roles, cheaters, and spoilsports. Johns Hopkins Magazine, 30, 46-53.
14.
Hopper, J. R. , & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.
15.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
16.
Kantola, S. J. , Syme, G. J., & Nesdale, A. R. (1983). The effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation: An informational analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 164-182.
17.
Kempton, W. , Darley, J. M., & Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological research for the new energy problems: Strategies and opportunities. American Psychologist, 47, 1213-1223.
18.
Kenrick, D. T. , McCreath, H. E., Govem, H. J., King, R., & Bordin, J. (1990). Person-environment intersections: Everyday settings and common trait dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 685-698.
19.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Macey, S. M. , & Brown, M. A. (1983). Residential energy conservation: The role of past experience in repetitive household behavior. Environment and Behavior, 15, 123-142.
21.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
MIT Energy Laboratory Policy Study Group . (1975). The FEA project independence report: An analytical review and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
23.
Murdock, G. P. (1970). Rank and potiatch among the Haida. In Yale University publications In anthropology (Vol. 13). New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files Press. (Original work published 1923)
24.
National Academy of Sciences . (1979). Energy in transition 1985-2010: Final report of the committee on nuclear and alternative energy systems. San Fransisco: W. H. Freeman.
25.
Neuman, K. (1986). Personal values and commitment to energy conservation. Environment and Behavior, 18, 53-74.
26.
Oberg, K. (1973). The social economy of the Tlingit IndianSeattle: University of Washington Press.
27.
Oskamp, S. , Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors Influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494-519.
28.
Price, R. H. , & Bouffard, D. L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Soda! Psychology, 30, 579-586.
29.
Sadalla, E. K. , & Burroughs, W. J. (1981). Food preferences and social Identity. Technical Report to the Science and Education Administration, Grant No. 5901-0410-9-0270-0, Washington, DC.
30.
Sadala, E. K. , Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738.
31.
Sadala, E. K. , Under, D. E., & Jenins, B. A. (1988). Sport preference: A self-presentational analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 214-222.
32.
Sadalia, E. K. , Vershure, B., & Burroughs, W. J. (1987). Identity symbolism in housing. Environment and Behavior, 19, 569-587.
33.
Sarbin, T. R. , & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Undzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 488-567). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34.
Schlenker, B. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism. Menlo Park. CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
35.
Schutte, N. S. , Kenilck, D. T., & Sdalia, E. K. (1985). The search for predictable settings: Situational prototypes, constraints, and behavioral variation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 121-128.
36.
Stern, P. C. (1992). What psychology knows about energy conservation. American Psychologist47, 1224-1232.
37.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism. Menlo Parc, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
38.
Stryker, S. (1981). Symbolic Interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Tumer (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 3-29). New York: Basic.
39.
Syme, G. J. , Seligman, C., Kantoia, S. J., & MacPherson, D. K. (1987). Evaluating a television campaign to promote petrol conservation. Environment and Behavior, 19, 444-461.
40.
Thomas, W. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl. Boston: Little, Brown.
41.
Udall, S. , Conconi, C., & Osteru D. (1974). The energy balloon. New York McGraw-Hill.
42.
U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1990). 1990 Census of population and housing. RL. 94-171 Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
43.
Veblen, T. (1899). The Teaiy of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Macmillan.
44.
Vining, J. , & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22, 55-73.
45.
Wang, T. H. , & Katzev, R. D. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: Two field experiments on promoting recycling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 265-275.
46.
White, E. M. (1980). Conceptual universals in interpersonal language. American Anthropologist, 82, 759-781.
