Social and Environmental Psychology

Abstract

Linkage between social and environmental psychology is illustrated through examination of the theoretical and empirical implications of a concept of "group space" defined as collectively inhabited and socioculturally controlled physical settings. This concept is applied to three levels of environmental settings, that is, school buildings, a university cafeteria, and urban residential areas. Such social-dynamic processes as group territorialities, group conflicts, social regulation of space-use, formation of group identity, and differentiation of public, semipublic, and private space were situated in physical environmental contexts. Three pilot studies revealed that (a) social space such as cafeteria and school buildings are differentiated and hierarchically integrated in terms of multifaceted group space depending on the social group, (b) groups exhibited different space-maintaining strategies and rules that strengthen socialization of group members, and (c) radical changes in the physical environment of a community initiated group-conflicts and renegotiation of group space.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman, I. , & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 7-40). New York: Wiley.

Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecoogical psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment and of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Chen, P.S.J. (Ed.). (1988). SINGAPORE SHAKAI NO KENKYU (Studies on Singapore society). Tokyo: Mekon.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity.

Kobe Institute of Urban Problems . (1986). The housing policies in Singapore. TOSHISEISAKU (Urban Policies), 45, 93-108.

Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Boston: MIT.

Minami, H. , & Yoshida, N. (1993). The hidden dimension of space in school environment: Implicit rules in the use of space. The MERA Journal, 2, 33-40.

Osmond, H. (1957). Function as a basis of psychiatric ward design. Mental Hospital, 8, 23-29.

Sampson, E. E. (1989). The challenge of social change for psychology: Globalization and psychology's theory of the person. Amercan Psychologist, 44(6), 914-921.

10.

Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

11.

Stokols, D. (1981). Group x place transactions: Some neglected issues in psychological research on settings. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An international perspective (pp. 393-415). Hillsdale, NJ: Wiley.

12.

Triandis, H. C. , Bontempo, R. , Villareal, M. J. , Asai, M. , & Lucca, I. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.

13.

Yoshida, N. (1991). Environmental conditions facilitating group interactions among pupils: The relationship between pupils' cognition of spatial structure and group transactions in a junior high school. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education of Hiroshima University, 40(1), 155-159.

14.

Wapner, S. (1987). A holistic, developmental, systems-oriented environmental psychology: Some beginnings. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1433-1465). New York: Wiley.