Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In a study of workplace territoriality, environmental and intrapersonal factors were posited to be predictive of workers' reactions to potential workspace invasions. Clerical and secretarial workers from two midsize universities and from four small nonuniversity workplaces (combined into one sample) completed a questionnaire regarding reactions to potential workspace invasions. Results from regression analyses indicated that for ail three samples, predictors of negative reactions to potential workspace invasions were (a) the dagree to which workers minded taking directions about their jobs f rom someone other than a supervisor and (b) sensitivity to personal space invasions in general. In addition, resistance to a permanent workspace change predicted invasion reactions for both university groups, whereas having fewer co-workers sharing an office predicted invasion reactions for nonuniversity workers. Results are discussed in terms of control models of territoriality. Application of the results to workplace settings is also briefly discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman, I. (1975). The environmentandsocialbehavior. New York: Irvington.

Altman, I. , & Chemers, M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

Bordens, K. S. , & Wollman, N. (1985, March). Territorialityin the workplace: Personality and environmental correlates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastem Psychological Association, Atlanta.

Brown, B. B. (1987). Territoriality. In D. Stokels & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: Wiley.

Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Duvall-Early, K. , & Benedict, J. O. (1992). The relationships between privacy and different components of job satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 24, 670-679.

Edney, J. J. (1976). Human territoriality: Comment on functional properties. Environmentand Behavior, 8, 31-47.

Edwards, A. L. (1953). Edwards Personal Preference Schedule. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental psychology. New York: Random House.

10.

Kelly, B. M. (1990, August). Personalization, unwanted interruptions, and work and job satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

11.

Scheier, L. H. , & Cattell, R. B. (1961). NSQ. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

12.

Sundstrom, E. (1986a). Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. New York: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Sundstrom, E. (1986b). Work environments: Offices and factories. In I. Altman & D. Stokels (Eds.), Handbookof environmentalpsychology(pp. 733-782). New York: Wiley.

14.

Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Environmental and Intrapersonal Predictors of Reactions to Potential Territorial Intrusions in the Workplace

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References