A sustainable planet is not possible without patterns of conserving behavior. The resource-costly life-styles that are characteristic of the current scene present a historic challenge. Never before have so many behaviors needed to change in so short a time. More challenging is that they must stay changed. For many reasons the techniques commonly used to promote conservation behavior are more reliable at modulating short-term behavior than at achieving durable change. The perceived urgency of environmental problems tends to make immediate behavior change the major focus. But of equal importance is the stability of behavior once changed. Thus one goal of conservation behavior research is to discover techniques that change individual behavior while minimizing or eliminating the need for repeated intervention. This article categerorizes behavior change techniques first by their informational or motivational nature and second by the source of the change: derived from others or gained by direct personal involvement. Evaluating selected techniques using five proposed dimensions suggests why durable behavior change has been so hard to achieve. Research implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Birch, D. , & Veroff, J. (1966). Motivation: A study of action. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
3.
Brehm, S. , & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
4.
Brewer, G. D. (in press). Environmental challenges and managerial responses. In N. Choucri (Ed.), Global commons: Environmental challenges and international responses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Burn, S. M. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 611-629.
6.
Burn, S. M. , & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29-41.
7.
Condry, J. , & Chambers, J. (1978). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning. In M. R. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of rewards: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation (pp. 61-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cone, J. D. , & Hayes, S. C. (1980). Environmental problems/behavioral solutions. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9.
Cook, S. W. , & Berrenberg, J. L. (1981). Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 73-107.
10.
Deci, E. L. (1992). On the nature and functions of motivation theories. Psychological Science, 3, 167-171.
11.
De Young, R. (1985-1986). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Environmental Systems, 15, 281-292.
12.
De Young, R. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment and Behavior, 18, 435-449.
13.
De Young, R. (1988-1989). Exploring the difference between recyclers and nonrecyclers: The role of information. Journal of Environmental Systems, 18, 341-351.
14.
De Young, R. (1990). Recycling as appropriate behavior: A review of survey data from selected recycling education programs in Michigan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3, 253-266.
15.
De Young, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1985-1986). Conservation behavior and the structure of satisfactions. Journal of Environmental Systems, 15, 233-242.
16.
De Young, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1988). On averting the tragedy of the commons. Environmental Management, 12, 273, 283.
17.
Fazio, R. H. , & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 161-202.
18.
Foa, U. G. (1971). Interpersonal and economic resources. Science, 171, 345-351.
19.
Folz, D. H. (1991). Recycling program design, management, and participation: A national survey of municipal experience. Public Administration Review, 51(3), 222-231.
20.
Geller, E. S. (1987). Applied behavior analysis and environmental psychology: From strange bedfellows to a productive marriage. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 361-388). New York: Wiley.
21.
Geller, E. S. (1989). Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 17-36.
22.
Geller, E. S. (1992). Solving environmental problems: A behavior change perspective. In S. Staub & P. Green (Eds.), Psychology and social responsibility: Facing global challenges (pp. 248-268). New York: New York University Press.
23.
Geller, E. S. , Needleman, L. D., & Randall, K. (1990). Developing a taxonomy of behavior change techniques for environmental protection. In Proceedings of the First U.S. Conference on Municipal Solid Waste Management: Solutions for the 90s (Vol. 3, pp. 1261-1285). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
24.
Geller, E. S. , Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavioral change. New YorkPergamon.
25.
Granzin, K. L. , & Olsen, J. E. (1991). Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: A focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 10, 1-27.
26.
Gray, D. B. (1985). Ecological beliefs and behaviors: Assessment and change. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
27.
Hopper, J. R. , & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.
28.
Kaplan, S. (1990). Being needed, adaptive muddling and human-environment relationships. EDRA 21. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. Oklahoma City, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
29.
Katz, D. , & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
30.
Katzev, R. D. (1986). The impact of commitment in promoting consumer energy conservation. In E. Monnier, G. Gaskell, P. Ester, B. Joerges, B. Lapillonne, C. Midden, & L. Puiseux (Eds.), Consumer behavior and energy policy: An international perspective (pp. 280-294). New York: Praeger.
31.
Katzev, R. D. (1989, February). How to motivate recycling: Applying minimal justification techniques. Paper presented at the Association for Conservation Information's Winter Workshop, Arlington, VA.
32.
Katzev, R. D. , & Johnson, T. R. (1983). A social-psychological analysis of residential electricity consumption: The impact of minimal justification techniques. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 267-284.
33.
Katzev, R. D. , & Johnson, T. R. (1987). Promoting energy conservation: An analysis of behavioral research. Boulder, CO: Westview.
34.
Katzev, R. D. , & Pardini, A. U. (1987-1988). The comparative effectiveness of rewards and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 17, 93-113.
35.
Kreutzwiser, R. (1991). Municipal recycling programs and household conservation behaviour. (ER 508G, funded by the Research and Technology Branch of Environment Ontario). Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Department of Geography.
36.
Lamb, R. E. (1990). The quarterly ear. COPPE Quarterly, 4(1), 2.
37.
Lepper, M. R. (1981). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in children: Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls. In W. Collins (Ed.), Aspects of the development of competence: The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 14, 155-160.
38.
Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 289-309.
39.
Lepper, M. R. , & Greene, D. (Eds.). (1978). The hidden costs of rewards: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-99.
41.
Mazis, M. R. (1975). Antipollution measures and psychological reactance theory: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 654-660.
42.
McClelland, L. , & Canter, R. J. (1981). Psychological research on energy conservation: Context, approaches, methods. In A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology: Volume 3. Energy conservation: Psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Monroe, M. C. , & Kaplan, S. (1988). When words speak louder than actions: Environmental problem solving in the classroom. Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 38-41.
44.
Nielsen, J. M. , & Ellington, B. L. (1983). Social processes and resource conservation: A case study in low technology recycling. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 288-312). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Nolan, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
46.
Oskamp, S. , Harrington, M. J., Edwards, T. C., Sherwood, D. L., Okuda, S. M., & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494-519.
47.
Pardini, A. U. , & Katzev, R. D. (1983-1984). The effects of strength of commitment on newspaper recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, 245-254.
48.
Pintrich, P. R. , & Garcia, G. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
49.
Pittman, T. S. , Emery, J., & Boggiano, A. K. (1982). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Reward-induced change in preference for complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 789-797.
50.
Reich, J. W. , & Robertson, J. L. (1979). Reactance and norm appeal in antilittering messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 91-101.
51.
Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an "explanation" of behavior?Psychological Science, 3, 150-161.
52.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
53.
Stem, P. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302.
54.
Stem, P. C. , & Aronson, E. (Eds.). (1984). Energy use: The human dimension. New York: Freeman.
55.
Stem, P. C. , Dietz, T., & Black, J. S. (1986). Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204-222.
56.
Stem, P. C. , & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1043-1088). New York: Wiley.
57.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1991, Spring/Summer). EDFs new recycling campaign. Reusable news. Communications Services Branch (OS-305). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
58.
Vargish, T. (1980). Why the person sitting next to you hates limits to growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16, 179-189.
59.
Vining, J. , & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 22, 55-73.
60.
Wang, T. H. , & Katzev, R. D. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: Two field experiments on promoting recycling. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 265-275.
