Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Sunlighting or direct-gain passive solar strategies let sunlight penetrate the living space. In environments where the well-being of the building occupant is a salient concern to the designer, this intrusion of sunlight ought to be controlled so that it does not impede the performance of the occupant. This study investigates the impact of window size and different amounts of sunlight penetration on occupant emotional response and degree of satisfaction. Unlike previous sunlight requirement studies, sunlight penetration is measured not in terms of duration, but rather in terms of size of sunlit areas, and therefore as a visual stimulus. The study was performed in an office room of a typical size. It was found that window size did not significantly affect the occupant emotional state or the degree of satisfaction. Sunlight penetration significantly affected the feeling of relaxation when the observer was sitting sideways to the window and the relationship had an inverted U-shape. The study stresses the validity of this novel way of assessing sunlight penetration in terms of size of the sun patches inside the room and its importance as a significant environmental attribute and design parameter that ought to be accounted for during the design of windows in sunlighting or direct-gain passive solar strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnaby, J. F. , (1980, February). Lighting for productivity gains. Lighting Design and Applications, pp. 20-28.

Belcher, C. M. , & Kluczny, R. (1987). Lighting ergonomics and the decision process. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Management, pp. 51-55.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Flynn, J. E. (1977). A study of subjective responses to low energy and non-uniform lighting systems. Lighting Design and Applications, 2, 6-15.

Giesen, M. , & Hendrick, C. (1974). Effect of seating distance and room illumination on the affective outcomes of small group interaction. Social Behavior and Personality, 2(1), 87-96.

Hull, R. B. , & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and Behavior, 21, 323-345.

Hull, R. B. , & Stewart, W. P. (1990). Ecological validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Hull, R. B. , Stewart, W. P. , & Yi, Y. (1990). The dynamic nature of a recreation experience. Journal of Leisure Research. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Isen, A. M. , Daubman, K. A. , & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.

10.

Isen, A. M. , Means, B. , & Nowicki, R. , (1982). Some factors influencing decision-making strategy and risk taking. In Affect and cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

11.

Jacob, E. (1966). Lighting and productivity. International Lighting Review, 103-108.

12.

Kim, J. O. , & Mueller, C. W. (1978a). Factor analysis-Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Kim, J. O. , & Mueller, C. W. (1978b). Introduction to factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

14.

Marans, R. , & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1981). Evaluating built environments: A behavioral approach. Ann Arbor: Institute For Social Research and Architectural Research Laboratory, University of Michigan.

15.

Marans, R. W. , & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1982). Evaluating open and conventional office design. Environmental and Behavior, 14, 333-351.

16.

Mehrabian, A. , & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

17.

Ne'eman, E. , Cradock, J. , & Hopkinson, R. G. (1976). Sunlight requirements in buildings-I. Building and Environment, 11, 217-238.

18.

Ne'eman, E. , Sweitzer, G. , & Vine, E. (1984). Office worker response to lighting and daylighting issues in workspace environments: A pilot survey. Energy and Buildings, 6, 159-171.

19.

Russell, J. A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 345-356.

20.

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.

21.

Russell, J. A. , & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311-322.

22.

Russell, J. A. , & Snodgrass, J. (1987). Emotion and the environment In I. Altman & D. Stokols (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 245-280). New York: Wiley.

23.

Wineman, J. D. (1982). Office design and evaluation: an overview. Environment and Behavior, 4, 271-298.

24.

Wotton, E. , & Barkow, B. (1983, February). An investigation of the effects of windows and lighting in offices. Proceedings of the International Daylighting Conference, 405-411.

Impact of Window Size and Sunlight Penetration on Office Workers' Mood and Satisfaction

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References