Observations were made for 12 general psychology classes taught over a 6-year period. Results showed that women sat in the front of the classroom more often than men, and also obtained higher grades and cut class fewer times than men. Furthermore, for men and women, grade point average decreased and number of absences increased as students sat farther from the front of the room.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, R. S. , & Biddle, B. J. (1970). Realities of teaching: Explorations with video tape. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2.
Becker, F. D. , Sommer, R., Bee, J., & Oxley, B. (1973). College classroom ecology. Sociometry, 36, 514-525.
3.
Brooks, C. I. (1987). Superiority of women in statistics achievement. Teaching of Psychology, 14, 45.
4.
Brooks, C. I. & Mercincavage, J. E. (1991). Grades for men and women in college courses taught by female instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 47-48.
5.
Grams, J. D. & Waetjen, W. B. (1975). Sex: Does It Make a Difference?North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
6.
Griffith, C. R. (1921). A comment upon the psychology of the audience. Psychological Monographs, 30, 36-47.
7.
Gump, P. (1987). School and classroom environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.). Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 698-701). New York: Wiley.
8.
Hillmann, R. B. , Brooks, C. I., & O'Brien, J. P. (in press). Differences in self-esteem of college freshmen as a function of classroom seating-row preference. The Psychological Record.
9.
Holliman, W. B. , & Anderson, H. N. (1986). Proximity and student density as ecological variables in a college classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 200-203.
10.
Koneya, M. (1976). Location and interaction in the row and column seating arrangements. Environment and Behavior, 8, 265-282.
11.
Leuptow, L. B. (1975). Parental status and influence and the achievement orientations of high school seniors. Sociology of Education, 48, 91-110.
12.
Levine, D. W. , O'Neal, E. C., Garwood, S. G., & McDonald, P. J. (1980). Classroom ecology: The effects of seating position on grades and participation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 409-412.
13.
Mercincavage, J. E. , & Brooks, C. I. (1990). Differences in achievement motivation of college business majors as a function of year in college and classroom seating position. Psychological Reports, 66, 632-634.
14.
Montello, D. R. (1988). Classroom seating location and its effect on course achievement, participation, and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8, 149-157.
15.
Rebeta, J. L. , & Brooks, C. I. (1990). Differences in achievement motivation of college students as a function of classroom seating preference. Unpublished raw data.
16.
Schwebel, A. I. , & Cherlin, D. L. (1972). Physical and social distancing in teacher-pupil relationships. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 543-550.
17.
Sommer, R. (1967). Classroom ecology. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 3, 489-503.
18.
Stires, L. (1980). Classroom seating location, student grades, and attitudes: Environment or self-selection. Environment and Behavior, 12, 241-254.
19.
Totusek, P. , & Staton-Spicer, A. (1982). Classroom seating preference as a function of student personality. Journal of Experimental Education, 505, 159-163.
20.
Walberg, H. J. (1969). Physical and psychological distance in the classroom. School Review77, 64-70.
21.
Weinstein, C. S. (1985). Seating arrangements in the classroom. International Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Pergamon.
22.
Wulf, K. M. (1977). Relationship of assigned classroom seating area to achievement variables. Educational Research Quarterly, 21, 56-62.
