Mission Destination,Mission Duration,Gender,and Student Perceptions of Space Habitat Acceptability

Abstract

In a role-playing study designed to test the hypothesis that mission destination and mission duration affect the perceived habitability of spaceflight environments, college students read one of four space mission scenarios which varied destination (the moon or Mars) and duration (one month or one year). They then completed a 7-factor environmental rating scale. Whereas mission destination had no effect on perceived habitability, the environment was less acceptable for the extended than for the brief mission, and women rated the environment less favorably than did men. Results suggest that spaceflight environments are multidimensional, and that to assess habitability we must not only ask, "What is the environment?" and "Who are the environment's occupants?" but also, "What are the conditions and circumstances surrounding the environment's use?"

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Connors, M. M. , Harrison, A. A. , & Akins, F. R. (1985). Living aloft: Human requirements for extended spaceflight (NASA SP-483). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Connors, M. M. , Harrison, A. A. , & Akins, F. R. (1986). Psychology and the resurgent space program. American Psychologist, 41, 906-913.

Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey , W. J. Ickes , & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Erkut, S. (1983). Exploring sex differences in expectancy, attribution, and academic achievement. Sex Roles, 9, 217-231.

Fiorentine, R. (1988). Sex differences in success expectancies and causal attributions: Is this why fewer women become physicians?" Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 236-249.

Harris, P. R. (1989). Behavioral science space contributions. Behavioral Science, 34, 207-236.

Harrison, A. A. , Clearwater, Y. A. , & McKay, C. P. (1989). The human experience in Antarctica: Applications to life in space. Behavioral Science, 34, 253-271.

Harrison, A. A. , Clearwater, Y. A. , & McKay, C. P. (Eds.). (1990). From Antarctica to outer space: Life in isolation and confinement. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Harrison, A. A. , Struthers, N. J. , & Putz, B. (1989). Individual differences, mission parameters, and spaceflight environment habitability. In C. Stoker (Ed.), The case for Mars III: Strategies for Exploration (pp. 191-199). San Diego, CA: Univelt.

10.

Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Applying psychology in outer space: Unfulfilled promises revisited. American Psychologist, 38, 445-450.

11.

Helmreich, R. L. , Wilhelm, J. E. , & Runge, T. E. (1980). Psychological considerations in future space missions. In S. Cheston & D. Winter (Eds.), Human factors in outer space production (pp. 1-23). Boulder, CO: Westview.

12.

National Commission on Space (1986). Pioneering the space frontier. New York: Bantam.

13.

Stuster, J. W. (1986). Space station habitability recommendations based on a systematic comparative analysis of analogous conditions. Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences.

14.

Suedfeld, P. (1990). Groups in isolation and confinement: Environments and experiences. In A. A. Harrison , Y. A. Clearwater , & C. P. McKay (Eds.), From Antarctica to outer space: Life in isolation and confinement (pp.135-146). New York: Springer-Verlag.

15.

White, N. (1984). On being one of the boys: An exploratory study of women's professional and domestic role definitions. Women's Studies International Forum, 7, 433-440.