This study investigates the affective experiences of Antarctic summer research teams through two complementary studies, examining daily triggers of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) as well as coping strategies used by team members. In Study 1, we conducted interviews with eight experienced Antarctic researchers to identify recurring affective events. In Study 2, we collected detailed quantitative daily diaries and qualitative reflections from a two-person team over a 19-day expedition at King George Island, Antarctica. Results show that PA was fostered by social, mission-related, and ecopsychological uplifts, while NA was triggered by social, physical, and environmental hassles. A crossover effect of affective states between team members was observed. Five coping strategies—reframing, praise, backup behavior, planning routines, and playfulness—emerged as effective in mitigating NA and enhancing PA. We propose a framework outlining how coping strategies shape affective dynamics in extreme environments, offering insights for future expedition teams and analogous settings worldwide.
AspinwallL. G.TaylorS. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.417
2.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
3.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58(5), 661–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705055967
4.
BarleyS. R. (1996). Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 404–441.
5.
BarrettL. F.RussellJ. A. (1999). The structure of current affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00003
6.
BellS. T.BrownS. G.MitchellT. (2019). What we know about team dynamics for long-distance space missions: A systematic review of analog research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00811
7.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
BundyA. C. (1993). Assessment of play and leisure: Delineation of the problem. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 217–222.
10.
ChangH. (2013). Individual and collaborative autoethnography as method. Handbook of Autoethnography, 107–122.
11.
ChangH.NgunjiriF.HernandezK.-A. C. (2016). Collaborative autoethnography. Routledge.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (CreswellJ. W., Ed.; pp. 203–225).
13.
CropanzanoR.DasboroughM. T. (2015). Dynamic models of well-being: Implications of affective events theory for expanding current views on personality and climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 844–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2015.1072245
14.
CropanzanoR.DasboroughM. T.WeissH. M. (2017). Affective events and the development of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0384
15.
EkvallG. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845
16.
EllisC.AdamsT. E.BochnerA. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historische Sozialforschung [Historical Social Research], 36(4), 273–290.
17.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327.
18.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
19.
GutermannD.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.BoerD.BornM.VoelpelS. C. (2017). How leaders affect followers’ work engagement and performance: Integrating leader−member exchange and crossover theory. British Journal of Management, 28(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12214
20.
HawkesC.NorrisK. (2017). Time-dependent mood fluctuations in Antarctic personnel: A meta-analysis. Polar Record, 53(5), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003224741700050x
21.
HenderlongJ.LepperM. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.774
22.
JoffeH.YardleyL. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In MarksD. F.YardleyL. (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). Sage.
23.
KahnP. M.LeonG. R. (2000). Group climate & individual functioning in an all-women Antarctic expedition team. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/2327-2937.1005
24.
LeonG. R.ListN.MagorG. (2004). Personal experiences and team effectiveness during a commemorative trek in the high Arctic. Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503262215
25.
LeonG. R.SandalG. M.LarsenE. (2011). Human performance in polar environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.001
26.
LeonG. R.SandalG. M.FinkB. A.CiofaniP. (2011). Positive experiences and personal growth in a two-man north pole expedition team. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510375039
27.
LiebermanJ. N. (2014). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. Academic Press.
28.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
29.
Marques-QuinteiroP.SchmutzJ. B.AntinoM.EppichW. J. (2024). Event characteristics and team adaptation in extreme contexts: Evidence from an Antarctic summer campaign. Group and Organization Management. Advance online publication.
30.
MartinsY. A. T.MoraesM. M.MendesT. T.MalufC. B.LadeiraR. V. P.WannerS. P.SoaresD. D.ArantesR. M. E. (2022). An exploratory study of short-term camping in Antarctica: Hormonal and mood states changes. Czech Polar Reports, 11(2), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.5817/cpr2021-2-24
31.
MayberyD.MayberyM.BresnanR.CroftB.GrahamR.MacaulayJ.McQualterS.MitchellE.SherwellK.SzakacsE. (2002). Responding to daily event questionnaires: The influence of the order of hassle and uplift scales. Stress and Health, 18(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.915
32.
MaynardT. M.KennedyD. M.ResickC. J. (2018). Teamwork in extreme environments: Lessons, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(6), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2302
33.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20–30.
PagelJ. I.ChoukèrA. (2016). Effects of isolation and confinement on humans-implications for manned space explorations. Journal of Applied Physiology, 120(12), 1449–1457. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00928.2015
36.
PalinkasL. A.HousealM. (2000). Stages of change in mood and behavior during a winter in Antarctica. Environment and Behavior, 32(1), 128–141.
37.
PalinkasL. A.SuedfeldP. (2021). Psychosocial issues in isolated and confined extreme environments. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 126, 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.032
38.
PuyveldeM. V.GijbelsD.CaelenbergT. V.SmithN.BessoneL.Buckle-CharlesworthS.PattynN. (2022). Living on the edge: How to prepare for it?Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 3, 1007774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2022.1007774
39.
RáčkováL.PompaT.ZlámalF.BartákM.NývltD.Bienertová-VaškůJ. (2024). Physiological evidence of stress reduction during a summer Antarctic expedition with a significant influence of previous experience and vigor. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 3981. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54203-9
40.
SandalG. M.van de VijverF. J. R.SmithN. (2018). Psychological hibernation in Antarctica. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2235–2235.
41.
SchmutzJ. B.BienefeldN.MaynardM. T.RicoR. (2023). Exceeding the ordinary: A framework for examining teams across the extremeness continuum and its impact on future research. Group & Organization Management, 48(2), 581–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221150756
42.
SkorupaA.PaligaM.DomuratA. (2024). The third quarter phenomenon revisited: The case of analog space habitat. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 99, 102415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102415
43.
SmithN.BostockL.BarrettE. C.SandalG. M.JonesM. V.WuebkerR. (2024). Profiles of resilient psychosocial function during three isolated ski expeditions in the High Arctic. Stress and Health, 40(3), e3331. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3331
44.
SmithN.KeatleyD.SandalG. M.KjaergaardA.StotenO.Facer-ChildsJ.BarrettE. C. (2021). Relations between daily events, coping strategies and health during a British army ski expedition across Antarctica. Environment and Behavior, 53(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519886367
45.
SmithN.SandalG. M.LeonG. R.KjærgaardA. (2017). Examining personal values in extreme environment contexts: Revisiting the question of generalizability. Acta Astronautica, 137, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.008
46.
StusterJ.BachelardC.SuedfeldP. (2000). The relative importance of behavioral issues during long-duration ICE missions. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 71(9 Suppl.), A17–A25.
47.
ThompsonE. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
48.
TortelloC.FolgueiraA.NicolasM.CuiuliJ. M.CairoliG.CrippaV.BarbaritoM.AbulafiaC.GolombekD. A.VigoD. E.PlanoS. A. (2021). Coping with Antarctic demands: Psychological implications of isolation and confinement. Stress and Health, 37(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3006
49.
VargasG. A.ArnettP. A. (2010). Positive everyday experiences interact with social support to predict depression in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(6), 1039–1046. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617710000834
WagstaffC. R. D.WestonN. J. V. (2014). Examining emotion regulation in an isolated performance team in Antarctica. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 3(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000022
52.
WeissH. M.CropanzanoR. (1996). Affective events theory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18(1), 1–74.
53.
WestmanM.ShadachE.KeinanG. (2013). The crossover of positive and negative emotions: The role of state empathy. International Journal of Stress Management, 20(2), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033205
54.
WilliamsL. (2019). Reshaping colonial subjectivities through the language of the land. Ecopsychology, 11(3), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0077
