Prior research on pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) has mainly focused on their cognitive antecedents, like biospheric values, norms and environmental concern. This study takes a broader view by integrating, in a comprehensive framework, the role of biospheric values with the sense of emotional connection with nature and environmental identity (EID). Moreover, this study also explores how these processes are shaped by autonomy-supportive parenting styles. Using Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM), data from 3,619 participants aged 18–35 were analyzed, controlling for age and gender. The findings show that autonomy-supportive parenting is strongly associated with biospheric values and emotional connection with nature. Biospheric values and emotional connection with nature were also significantly related to EID. Finally, EID predicted three out of four types of PEBs. Theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/1.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
ArbuthnotJ.LinggS. (1975). A comparison of French and American environmental behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes 1 2. International Journal of Psychology, 10(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/1.1080/00207597508247339
3.
BalundèA.JovarauskaitėL.PoškusM. S. (2019). Exploring the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/1.1177/2158244019841925
4.
BalundèA.PerlaviciuteG. (2023). Are we on the same page? Exploring the relationships between environmental values, self-identity, personal norms and behavior in parent-adolescent dyads. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92, 102157.
5.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall.
6.
BarbaroN.PickettS. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 137–142. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026
7.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
8.
BarniD.RussoC.ZagreanI.Di FabioM.DanioniF. (2022). Adolescents’ internalization of moral values: The role of paternal and maternal promotion of volitional functioning. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/1.1080/132294.202.1789494
9.
BarretoM. L.SzóstekA.KarapanosE.NunesN. J.PereiraL.QuintalF. (2014). Understanding families’ motivations for sustainable behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 6–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.042
10.
BaumrindD. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887–907. https://doi.org/1.2307/1126611
11.
BaumrindD. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43–88.
12.
BaumrindD. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4(1, Pt.2), 1–103. https://doi.org/1.1037/h0030372
13.
BaumrindD. (1989). Rearing competent children. In DamonW. (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349–378). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
14.
BaumrindD. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/1.1177/0272431691111004
15.
BecerraE. P.CarreteL.ArroyoP. (2023). A study of the antecedents and effects of green self-identity on green behavioral intentions of young adults. Journal of Business Research, 155, 11338. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113380
16.
BellD. C.BellL. G. (2018). Accuracy of retrospective reports of family environment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 1029–1104. https://doi.org/1.1007/s10826-017-0948-5
17.
BlattE. (2013). Exploring environmental identity and behavior change in an environmental science class. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 467–488. https://doi.org/1.1007/s11422-012-9459-2
BollenK. A.PearlJ. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In MorganS. (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/1.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_15
20.
BonanJ.CattaneoC.d’AddaG.TavoniM. (2021). Can social information programs be more effective? The role of environmental identity for energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 108, 102467. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jeem.2021.102467
21.
BortzP.BerriganM.VanBergenA.GavazziS. M. (2019). Family systems thinking as a guide for theory integration: Conceptual overlaps of differentiation, attachment, parenting style, and identity development in families with adolescents. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(4), 544–556. https://doi.org/1.1111/jftr.12354
22.
BoumanT.StegL.KiersH. A. (2018). Measuring values in environmental research: A test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 300529. https://doi.org/1.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
23.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/1.1177/0049124192021002005
24.
ButlerK.GordonR.RoggeveenK.WaittG.CooperP. (2016). Social marketing and value in behaviour? Perceived value of using energy efficiently among low income older citizens. Journal of Social Marketing, 6(2), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514553691
25.
CarloG.McGinleyM.HayesR.BatenhorstC.WilkinsonJ. (2007). Parenting styles or practices? Parenting, sympathy, and prosocial behaviors among adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(2), 147–176. https://doi.org/1.3200/GNTP.168.2.147-176
26.
ChambersJ. A.PowerK. G.DurhamR. C. (2004). Parental styles and long-term outcome following treatment for anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 11(3), 187–198.
27.
ChandlerC. L.ConnellJ. P. (1987). Children’s intrinsic, extrinsic and internalized motivation: A developmental study of children’s reasons for liked and disliked behaviors. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/1.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01072.x
28.
ChawlaL. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2(3), 619–642. https://doi.org/1.1002/pan3.10128
29.
ChenF.GarciaO. F.AlcaideM.Garcia-RosR.GarciaF. (2024). Do we know enough about negative parenting? Recent evidence on parenting styles and child maladjustment. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 16, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5093/ejpalc2024a4
30.
ChenZ. Y.KaplanH. B. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of constructive parenting. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/1.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00017.x
31.
ChwialkowskaA.BhattiW. A.GlowikM. (2020). The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122305. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jclepro.202.122305
32.
ClaytonS.CzellarS.Nartova-BochaverS.SkibinsJ. C.SalazarG.TsengY. C.IrkhinB.Monge-RodriguezF. S. (2021). Cross-cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale. Sustainability, 13(4), 2387. https://doi.org/1.3390/su13042387
33.
ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.). (2003). Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. MIT Press.
34.
ColladoS.EvansG. W.SorrelM. A. (2017). The role of parents and best friends in children’s pro-environmentalism: Differences according to age and gender. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 27–37. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.007
35.
DanioniF.BarniD. (2018). Using the portrait values questionnaire to assess children’s perceptions of parental socialization values. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 25(3), 1–21.
36.
DarlingN.SteinbergL. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496.
de GrootJ. I.StegL. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/1.1177/0013916506297831
39.
de GrootJ. I.StegL. (2009). Mean or green: Which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior?Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/1.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x
40.
DesrochersJ. E.ZelenskiJ. M. (2023). Why are males not doing these environmental behaviors?: Exploring males’ psychological barriers to environmental action. Current Psychology, 42(29), 25042–25060. https://doi.org/1.1007/s12144-022-03587-w
41.
DietzT.KalofL.SternP. C. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 353–364. https://doi.org/1.1111/1540-6237.00088
42.
DresnerM.HandelmanC.BraunS.Rollwagen-BollensG. (2015). Environmental identity, pro-environmental behaviors, and civic engagement of volunteer stewards in Portland area parks. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 991–101. https://doi.org/1.1080/13504622.2014.964188
43.
DuncanL. G.CoatsworthJ. D.GreenbergM. T. (2009). A model of mindful parenting: implications for parent-child relationships and prevention research. Clinical child and family psychology review, 12(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-009-0046-3
44.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
45.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/1.1111/bjop.12046
EvansG. W.OttoS.KaiserF. G. (2018). Childhood origins of young adult environmental behavior. Psychological Science, 29(5), 679–687. https://doi.org/1.1177/0956797617741894
48.
FornaraF.CarrusG.PassafaroP.BonnesM. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on proenvironmental behaviors: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 623–635. https://doi.org/1.1177/1368430211408149
49.
FornaraF.MolinarioE.ScopellitiM.BonnesM.BonaiutoF.CiceroL.AdmiraalJ.BeringerA.DedeurwaerdereT.de GrootW.HiedanpääJ.BonaiutoM. (2020). The extended value-belief-norm theory predicts committed action for nature and biodiversity in Europe. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106338. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.eiar.2019.106338
50.
FrickJ.KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1597–1613. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
51.
FritscheI.BarthM.JugertP.MassonT.ReeseG. (2018). A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/1.1037/rev0000090
52.
GarcíaO. F.AlcaideM.Musitu-FerrerD.Pons-BenaventL.GarcíaF. (2024). Parental socialization based on warmth and strictness among adolescents and young adults: Which parenting dimension is related to greater adjustment?SAGE Open, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241289684
53.
GarcíaO. F.SerraE. (2019). Raising children with poor school performance: Parenting styles and short-and long-term consequences for adolescent and adult development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1089.
54.
GaterslebenB.MurtaghN.AbrahamseW. (2014). Values, identity and pro-environmental behavior. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/1.1080/21582041.2012.682086
55.
GentinaE.MuratoreI. (2012). Environmentalism at home: The process of ecological resocialization by teenagers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/1.1002/cb.373
56.
GeorgeD. L.SouthwellP. L. (1986). Opinion on the diablo canyon nuclear power plant: The effects of situation and socialization. Social Science Quarterly; Austin, Tex., 67(4), 722–735.
57.
GiancolaM.PinoM. C.ZacheoC.SanninoM.D’AmicoS. (2024). The intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental behaviours: The role of moral judgment in primary school-age children. Social Sciences, 13(6), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13060318
Gram-HanssenK.BartiauxF.JensenO. M.CantaertM. (2007). Do homeowners use energy labels? A comparison between Denmark and Belgium. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2879–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.017
60.
GrayM. R.SteinbergL. (1999). Unpacking authoritative parenting: Reassessing a multidimensional construct. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(3), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.2307/353561
61.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviors in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 414–421. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002
62.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 292–302. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.joep.2011.1.001
63.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2017). Why young people do things for the environment: The role of parenting for adolescents’ motivation to engage in pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 11–19. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.005
64.
GrusecJ. E.GoodnowJ. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/1.1037/0012-1649.3.1.4
65.
GuanW.GengL. (2024). Intergenerational influence on children’s pro-environmental behaviors: Exploring the roles of psychological richness and mindful parenting. Personality and Individual Differences, 229, 112778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112778
66.
HainesA.SmithK. R.AndersonD.EpsteinP. R.McMichaelA. J.RobertsI.WilkinsonP.WoodcockJ.WoodsJ. (2007). Policies for accelerating access to clean energy, improving health, advancing development, and mitigating climate change. The Lancet, 370(9594), 1264–1281. https://doi.org/1.1016/S0140-6736(07)61257-4
67.
HanH. (2015). Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47, 164–177. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014
68.
HansenA. R.JacobsenM. H. (2020). Like parent, like child: Intergenerational transmission of energy consumption practices in Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science, 61, 101341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101341
HardyS. A.Padilla-WalkerL. M.CarloG. (2008). Parenting dimensions and adolescents’ internalisation of moral values. Journal of Moral Education, 37(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/1.1080/03057240802009512
71.
HelferichM.ThøgersenJ.BergquistM. (2023). Direct and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 80, 10268. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680
72.
HenzeN.ZirklerB. (1990). A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 19(10), 3595–3617. https://doi.org/1.1080/03610929008830400
73.
HeynenE.Van der HelmP.SimonE.StamsG. J.AssinkM. (2021). 4 Parenting style and empathy in youth. In JolliffeD.FarringtonD. (Eds.), Empathy versus offending, aggression and bullying: Advancing knowledge using the Basic Empathy scale (pp. 43–50). Routledge.
74.
HindsJ.SparksP. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001
75.
HinesJ. M.HungerfordH. R.TomeraA. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/1.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
76.
HoergerM. (2010). Participant dropout as a function of survey length in Internet-mediated university studies: Implications for study design and voluntary participation in psychological research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), 697–700. https://doi.org/1.1089/cyber.2009.0445
77.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–56.
78.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/1.1080/10705519909540118
79.
IwaniecJ.Curdt-ChristiansenX. L. (2020). Parents as agents: Engaging children in environmental literacy in China. Sustainability, 12(16), 6605. https://doi.org/1.3390/su12166605
80.
JansL. (2021). Changing environmental behavior from the bottom up: The formation of pro-environmental social identities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101531. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.202.101531
81.
JiaF.YuH. (2021). Action, communication, and engagement: How parents “ACE” children’s pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101575.
KaiserF. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 395–422. https://doi.org/1.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
84.
KaiserF. G.OerkeB.BognerF. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004
85.
Katz-GerroT.GreenspanI.HandyF.VeredY. (2020). Environmental behavior in three countries: The role of intergenerational transmission and domains of socialization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101343. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101343
86.
KemptonW.HollandD. C. (2003). Identity and sustained environmental practice. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 317–341). MIT Press.
87.
KimS.HagtvetK. A. (2003). The impact of misspecified item parceling on representing latent variables in covariance structure modeling: A simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/1.1207/S15328007SEM1001_5
88.
KlöcknerC. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028–1038.
89.
KlöcknerC. A.LöfströmE. (2022). What is disruptive communication, and why might it be necessary? In KlöcknerC. A.LöfströmE. (Eds.), Disruptive environmental communication (pp. 1–17). Springer. https://doi.org/1.1007/978-3-031-17165-9_1
90.
KogerS. M. (2013). Psychological and behavioral aspects of sustainability. Sustainability, 5(7), 3006–3008. https://doi.org/1.3390/su5073006
91.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–226. https://doi.org/1.1080/13504620220145401
92.
KorkmazS.GoksulukD.ZararsizG. (2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6, 151–162. https://doi.org/1.32614.RJ-2014-031
93.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of pro-environmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
94.
KropfeldM. I.NepomucenoM. V.DantasD. C. (2018). The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/1.1177/0743915618810448
95.
KumarN.GargP.SinghS. (2022). Pro-environmental purchase intention towards eco-friendly apparel: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior with perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concern. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 13(2), 134–15. https://doi.org/1.1080/20932685.2021.2016062
96.
LacasseK. (2016). Don’t be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 149–158. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006
97.
LangeF.DewitteS. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–91. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009
98.
LeeY. K.KimS.KimM. S.ChoiJ. G. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2097–2105. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018
99.
LiX.LiuZ.LuoJ.JinT.JiaY.WuY. (2023). The phenomenon and mechanism of intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(7), 1254. https://doi.org/1.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01254
100.
LitinaA.MoriconiS.ZanajS. (2016). The cultural transmission of environmental values: A comparative approach. World Development, 84, 131–148. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.016
101.
LittleT. D.RhemtullaM.GibsonK.SchoemannA. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–330. https://doi.org/1.1037/a0033266
102.
LiuX.KaidaN. (2024). Parent–child intergenerational associations of environmental attitudes, psychological barriers, and pro-environmental behaviors in Japan and China. Sustainability, 16(23), 10445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310445
103.
LiuY.LachmanM. E. (2019). Socioeconomic status and parenting style from childhood: Long-term effects on cognitive function in middle and later adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(6), e13–e24.
104.
MaccobyE. E.MartinJ. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In MussenP. H. (Series Ed.) HetheringtonE. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. IV. Socialization, personality and social development (4th ed., pp. 1–101). Wiley.
105.
MackayC. M. L.SchmittM. T. (2019). Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101323. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101323
106.
MackayC. M. L.SchmittM. T.LutzA. E.MendelJ. (2021). Recent developments in the social identity approach to the psychology of climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 95–101.https://doi.org/1.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.009
107.
MardiaK. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–553.
108.
Martinez-EscuderoJ. A.VillarejoS.GarciaO. F.GarciaF. (2020). Parental socialization and its impact across the lifespan. Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 101. https://doi.org/1.3390/bs10060101
109.
MatthiesE.SelgeS.KlöcknerC. A. (2012). The role of parental behavior for the development of behavior specific environmental norms—The example of recycling and re-use behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003
110.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. P. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2004.1.001
111.
MeeusenC. (2014). The intergenerational transmission of environmental concern: The influence of parents and communication patterns within the family. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 77–79. https://doi.org/1.1080/00958964.2013.846290
112.
MemonM. A.JunH. C.TingH.FrancisC. W. (2018). Mediation analysis issues and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(1), i–ix.
113.
MolinarioE.KruglanskiA. W.BonaiutoF.BonnesM.CiceroL.FornaraF.ScopellitiM.AdmiraalJ.BeringerA.DedeurwaerdereT.deGrootW.HiedanpääJ.KnightsP.KnippenbergL.OvdendenC.Polajnar HorvatK.PopaF.Porras-GomezC.SmrekarA.. . . BonaiutoM. (2020). Motivations to act for the protection of nature biodiversity and the environment: A matter of “significance”. Environment and Behavior, 52(10), 1133–1163. https://doi.org/1.1177/0013916518824376
114.
Musitu-FerrerD.León-MorenoC.Callejas-JerónimoJ. E.Esteban-IbáñezM.Musitu-OchoaG. (2019). Relationships between parental socialization styles, empathy and connectedness with nature: Their implications in environmentalism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2461. https://doi.org/1.3390/ijerph16142461
115.
NewmanT. P.FernandesR. (2016). A re-assessment of factors associated with environmental concern and behavior using the 2010 General Social Survey. Environmental Education Research, 22(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/1.1080/13504622.2014.999227
116.
NguyenT. N.LoboA.GreenlandS. (2016). Pro-environmental purchase behavior: The role of consumers’ biospheric values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 98–108. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.010
117.
NielsenK. S.ClaytonS.SternP. C.DietzT.CapstickS.WhitmarshL. (2021). How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist, 76(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/1.1037/amp0000624
118.
NigburD.LyonsE.UzzellD. (2010). Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behavior: Using an expanded theory of planned behavior to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 259–284. https://doi.org/1.1348/014466609X449395
119.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(6), 715–74. https://doi.org/1.1177/0013916508318748
120.
NordlundA. M.GarvillJ. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/1.1177/001391602237244
121.
OhR. R. Y.FieldingK. S.NghiemL. T. P.ChangC. C.CarrascoL. R.FullerR. A. (2021). Connection to nature is predicted by family values, social norms and personal experiences of nature. Global Ecology and Conservation, 28, e01632. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01632
122.
OlivosP.ClaytonS. (2017). Self, nature and well-being: Sense of connectedness and environmental identity for quality of life. In Fleury-BahiG.PolE.NavarroO. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. International handbooks of quality-of-life (pp. 107–126). Springer. https://doi.org/1.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_6
123.
ParraÁ.Sánchez-QueijaI.García-MendozaM. D. C.CoimbraS.Egídio OliveiraJ.DíezM. (2019). Perceived parenting styles and adjustment during emerging adulthood: A cross-national perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2757. https://doi.org/1.3390/ijerph16152757
124.
PerkinsH. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 455–463. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.201.05.004
125.
PothitouM.HannaR. F.ChalvatzisK. J. (2016). Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behavior and energy savings in households: An empirical study. Applied Energy, 184, 1217–1229. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.017
126.
QueirozP.GarciaO. F.GarciaF.ZacaresJ. J.CaminoC. (2020). Self and nature: Parental socialization, self-esteem, and environmental values in Spanish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3732. https://doi.org/1.3390/ijerph17103732
127.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
128.
RengerD.ReeseG. (2017). From equality-based respect to environmental activism: Antecedents and consequences of global identity. Political Psychology, 38(5), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12382
129.
RestallB.ConradE. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264–278. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022
130.
RinalloE.TiberioL.ScopellitiM. (2023). The mediating role of environmental identity in the relationship between biospheric values, connectedness to nature, and environmental activism. Psicologia Sociale, 18(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/1.1482/108584
131.
RosaE. A.DietzT. (2012). Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 581–586. https://doi.org/1.1038/nclimate1506
132.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/1.18637/jss.v048.i02
133.
RoszakT. E.GomesM. E.KannerA. D. (1995). Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind. Sierra Club Books.
134.
RudyD.GrusecJ. E. (2001). Correlates of authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist cultures and implications for understanding the transmission of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032002007
135.
SanvictoresT.MendezM. D. (2022). Types of parenting styles and effects on children. StatPearls Publishing.
136.
SardianouE. (2007). Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households. Energy Policy, 35(7), 3778–3791. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.020
137.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/1.1007/BF02296192
138.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/1.1177/0013916511421196
139.
SchipperL.BartlettS.HawkD.VineE. (1989). Linking life-styles and energy use: A matter of time?Annual Review of Energy, 14(1), 273–32. https://doi.org/1.1146/annurev.eg.14.110189.001421
140.
SchultzP. W.GouveiaV. V.CameronL. D.TankhaG.SchmuckP.FranekM. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/1.1177/0022022105275962
141.
SchultzP. W.ZeleznyL. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior: A five country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 540–558. https://doi.org/1.1177/0022022198294003
142.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Academic Press.
143.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Academic Press. https://doi.org/1.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
144.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.VecchioneM.DavidovE.FischerR.BeierleinC.RamosA.VerkasaloM.LönnqvistJ.-E.DemirutkuK.Dirilen-GumusO.KontyM. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/1.1037/a0029393
145.
ScopellitiM.BarniD.RinalloE. (2022). My parents taught. . . green was my growth! The role of intergenerational transmission of ecological values in young adults’ pro-environmental behaviors and their psychosocial mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 167. https://doi.org/1.3390/ijerph19031670
146.
SimonsL. G.SuttonT. E. (2021). The long arm of parenting: How parenting styles influence crime and the pathways that explain this effect. Criminology, 59(3), 520–544.
147.
SinghP.SahadevS.OatesC. J.AlevizouP. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective. Journal of Business Research, 115, 110–121. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jbusres.202.04.047
148.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001
149.
SoperD. S. (2023). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. Available from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
150.
SteentjesK.KurzT.BarretoM.MortonT. A. (2017). The norms associated with climate change: Understanding social norms through acts of interpersonal activism. Global Environmental Change, 43, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.008
151.
StegL.BolderdijkJ. W.KeizerK.PerlaviciuteG. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behavior: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104–115. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
152.
StegL.de GrootJ. (2010). Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 725–743. https://doi.org/1.1348/014466609X477745
153.
StegL.de GrootJ. I.DreijerinkL.AbrahamseW.SieroF. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources, 24(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/1.1080/08941920903214116
154.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2008.1.004
155.
SteinbergL.LambornS. D.DarlingN.MountsN. S.DornbuschS. M. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65(3), 754–777. https://doi.org/1.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00781.x
156.
SteinbergL.MorrisA. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 83–11. https://doi.org/1.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.83
157.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
158.
TamK. P. (2013). Dispositional empathy with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 92–104. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004
159.
TamK. P. (2015). Understanding intergenerational cultural transmission through the role of perceived norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1260–1266. https://doi.org/1.1177/0022022115600074
160.
TammA.TulvisteT. (2020). To what extent do perceived parental socialization values match Estonian adolescents’ personal values?Child Indicators Research, 13, 1811–1825. https://doi.org/1.1007/s12187-020-09724-w
161.
TianH.LiuX. (2022). Pro-environmental behavior research: Theoretical progress and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6721. https://doi.org/1.3390/ijerph19116721.
162.
TrudelR.ArgoJ. J.MengM. D. (2016). The recycled self: Consumers’ disposal decisions of identity-linked products. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/1.1093/jcr/ucw014
163.
UdallA. M.de GrootJ. I.de JongS. B.ShankarA. (2020). How do I see myself? A systematic review of identities in pro-environmental behavior research. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 19(2), 108–141. https://doi.org/1.1002/cb.1798
164.
UluE.ErdentuğG. (2018). The relationship between 5 year-old children’s social value acquisition and parenting styles. Quality & Quantity, 52(Suppl. 2), 1137–1149. https://doi.org/1.1007/s11135-017-0564-x
165.
van der WerffE.StegL. (2015). One model to predict them all: Predicting energy behaviors with the norm activation model. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 8–14. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.erss.2014.11.002
166.
van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006
167.
Van IjzendoornM. H. (1992). Intergenerational transmission of parenting: A review of studies in nonclinical populations. Developmental Review, 12(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90004
168.
VansteenkisteM.NiemiecC. P.SoenensB. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In UrdanT. C.KarabenickS. A. (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 105–165). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/1.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A007
169.
VestergrenS.DruryJ.ChiriacE. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12270
170.
Vicente-MolinaM. A.Fernández-SáinzA.Izagirre-OlaizolaJ. (2013). Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behavior: Comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 130–138. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
171.
WangX.Van der WerffE.BoumanT.HarderM. K.StegL. (2021). I am vs. We are: How biospheric values and environmental identity of individuals and groups can influence pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 618956. https://doi.org/1.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956
172.
WhitburnJ.LinklaterW.AbrahamseW. (2020). Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/1.1111/cobi.13381
173.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/1.1016/j.jenvp.201.01.003
174.
WilliamsK. E.CiarrochiJ. (2020). Perceived parenting styles and values development: A longitudinal study of adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30(2), 541–558. https://doi.org/1.1111/jora.12542
175.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia, Harvard University Press.
176.
WongT. K.KonishiC.KongX. (2021). Parenting and prosocial behaviors: A meta-analysis. Social Development, 30(2), 343–373. https://doi.org/1.1111/sode.12481
177.
XiaW.LiL. M. W. (2022). Multilevel evidence for the parent-adolescent dyadic effect of familiarity with climate change on pro-environmental behaviors in 14 societies: Moderating effects of societal power distance and individualism. Environment and Behavior, 54(7–8), 1097–1132. https://doi.org/1.1177/00139165221129550
178.
XiaoC.HongD. (2010). Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population and Environment, 32, 88–104. https://doi.org/1.1007/s11111-010-0115-z
179.
YurievA.DahmenM.PailléP.BoiralO.GuillaumieL. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 10466.
180.
YuslizaM. Y.AmirudinA.RahadiR. A.Nik Sarah AthirahN. A.RamayahT.MuhammadZ.Dal MasF.MassaroM.SaputraJ.MokhlisS. (2020). An investigation of pro-environmental behavior and sustainable development in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(17), 7083. https://doi.org/1.3390/su12177083
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
