Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) has become a widely-used theoretical framework to explain the risk-reducing behavior of individuals toward flooding and other natural hazards. Despite a quickly growing body of literature applying PMT in the context of flooding, insights into changes in PMT components and risk-reducing behavior are largely lacking due to a predominant use of cross-sectional research designs. In this study, we examine how various intrapersonal sources of information relate to changes in PMT components and risk-reducing behavior, using unique panel data (n = 2,680) from a survey in Germany and a fixed-effects regression modeling approach. In line with PMT, we find that various intrapersonal sources of information, like prior experience, relate to changes in PMT components. We also find that coping appraisals of PMT change in a direction negatively related to risk-reducing behavior over time, posing a challenge for risk communication and the envisaged shift to integrated flood risk management.
AertsJ. C. J. H.BotzenW. J. W.ClarkeK. C.CutterS. L.HallJ. W.MerzB.Michel-KerjanE.MysiakJ.SurminskiS.KunreutherH. (2018). Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment. Nature Climate Change, 8(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
2.
AlfieriL.FeyenL.DottoriF.BianchiA. (2015). Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 35, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004
3.
AndorM. A.OsberghausD.SimoraM. (2020). Natural disasters and governmental aid: Is there a charity hazard?Ecological Economics, 169, 106534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106534
4.
AtreyaA.FerreiraS.Michel-KerjanE. (2015). What drives households to buy flood insurance? New evidence from Georgia. Ecological Economics, 117, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.024
5.
BabcickyP.SeebauerS. (2019). Unpacking protection motivation theory: Evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior. Journal of Risk Research, 22(12), 1503–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1485175
6.
BaetschmannG.BallantyneA.StaubK. E.WinkelmannR. (2020). Feologit: A new command for fitting fixed-effects ordered logit models. The Stata Journal, 20(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X20930984
7.
BarendrechtM. H.ViglioneA.KreibichH.MerzB.VorogushynS.BlöschlG. (2019). The value of empirical data for estimating the parameters of a sociohydrological flood risk model. Water Resources Research, 55(2), 1312–1336. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024128
BotzenW. J. W.AertsJ. C. J. H.van den BerghJ. (2009). Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecological Economics, 68(8–9), 2265–2277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019
10.
BubeckP.BerghäuserL.HudsonP.ThiekenA. H. (2020). Using panel data to understand the dynamics of human behavior in response to flooding. Risk Analysis, 40(11), 2340–2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13548
11.
BubeckP.BotzenW. J. W. (2013). Response to “The necessity for longitudinal studies in risk perception research.”Risk Analysis, 33(5), 760–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12028
12.
BubeckP.BotzenW. J. W.AertsJ. C. J. H. (2012). A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32(9), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
13.
BubeckP.BotzenW. J. W.KreibichH.AertsJ. C. J. H. (2012). Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: An analysis for the German part of the river Rhine. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12(11), 3507–3518. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012
14.
BubeckP.BotzenW. J. W.KreibichH.AertsJ. C. J. H. (2013). Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1327–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
15.
BubeckP.BotzenW. J. W.LaudanJ.AertsJ. C. J. H.ThiekenA. H. (2018). Insights into flood-coping appraisals of protection motivation theory: Empirical evidence from Germany and France. Risk Analysis, 38(6), 1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12938
16.
BuchananJ. M. (1975). The Samaritan’s dilemma. In: PhelpsE. S. (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory (pp. 71–85). New York, USA: Russel Sage Foundation.
CRED & UNDRR. (2020). Human cost of disasters. An overview of the last 20 years: 2000–2019.
19.
Deutscher Bundestag (2021). Gesetz zur Errichtung eines Sondervermögens „Aufbauhilfe 2021” und zur vorübergehenden Aussetzung der Insolvenzantragspflicht wegen Starkregenfällen und Hochwassern im Juli 2021 sowie zur Änderung weiterer Gesetze (Aufbauhilfegesetz 2021 - AufbhG 2021). Bundesgesetzblatt Teil I(63).
20.
Di BaldassarreG.ViglioneA.CarrG.KuilL.YanK.BrandimarteL.BlöschlG [Günter]. (2015). Debates-perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resources Research, 51(6), 4770–4781. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016416
21.
DillenardtL.HudsonP.ThiekenA. H. (2022). Urban pluvial flood adaptation: Results of a household survey across four German municipalities. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 15(3), e12748. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12748
22.
DottoriF.SzewczykW.CiscarJ. -C.ZhaoF.AlfieriL.HirabayashiY.BianchiA.MongelliI.FrielerK.BettsR. A.FeyenL. (2018). Increased human and economic losses from river flooding with anthropogenic warming. Nature Climate Change, 8(9), 781–786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z
23.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
24.
FloydD. L.Prentice-DunnS.RogersR. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x
25.
GrothmannT.ReusswigF. (2006). People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards, 38(1–2), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
26.
HaerT.BotzenW. J. W.MoelH.AertsJ. C. J. H. (2017). Integrating household risk mitigation behavior in flood risk analysis: An agent-based model approach. Risk Analysis, 37(10), 1977–1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12740
27.
HuangS.-K.LindellM. K.PraterC. S. (2016). Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies. Environment and Behavior, 48(8), 991–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515578485
28.
HudsonP.BotzenW. J. W.CzajkowskiJ.KreibichH. (2017). Moral hazard in natural disaster insurance markets: Empirical evidence from Germany and the United States. Land Economics, 93(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.2.179
29.
HudsonP.BotzenW. J. W.KreibichH.BubeckP.AertsJ. C. J. H. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(7), 1731–1747. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1731-2014
30.
HudsonP.BubeckP.ThiekenA. H. (2022). A comparison of flood-protective decision-making between German households and businesses. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09982-1
31.
HudsonP.ThiekenA. H.BubeckP. (2020). The challenges of longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain. Journal of Risk Research, 23(5), 642–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1617339
JongmanB.Hochrainer-StiglerS.FeyenL.AertsJ. C. J. H.MechlerR.BotzenW. J. W.BouwerL. M.PflugG.RojasR.WardP. J. (2014). Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods. Nature Climate Change, 4(4), 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2124
34.
KellensW.TerpstraT.de MaeyerP. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
35.
KoerthJ.VafeidisA. T.HinkelJ.SterrH. (2013). What motivates coastal households to adapt pro-actively to sea-level rise and increasing flood risk?Regional Environmental Change, 13(4), 897–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0399-x
36.
KreibichH.BubeckP.van VlietM.MoelH. de (2015). A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(6), 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
37.
KreibichH.ChristenbergerS.SchwarzeR. (2011). Economic motivation of households to undertake private precautionary measures against floods. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(2), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-309-2011
38.
KreibichH.HudsonP.MerzB. (2021). Knowing what to do substantially improves the effectiveness of flood early warning. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 102(7), E1450–E1463. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0262.1
39.
KuhlickeC.SeebauerS.HudsonP.BeggC.BubeckP.DittmerC.GrothmannT.HeidenreichA.KreibichH.LorenzD. F.MassonT.ReiterJ.ThalerT.ThiekenA. H.BambergS. (2020). The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications. WIREs Water, 7(3), e1418. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1418
40.
KunreutherH. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 12(2–3), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055792
41.
LengfeldK.WalawenderE.WinterrathT.BeckerA. (2021). CatRaRE: A catalogue of radar-based heavy rainfall events in Germany derived from 20 years of data. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 30(6), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2021/1088
42.
LindellM. K.PerryR. W. (2012). The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
43.
MartinI. M.BenderH.RaishC. (2007). What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: The case of wildland fires. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00930.x
44.
MilneS.SheeranP.OrbellS. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: A meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 106–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2000.TB02308.X
45.
MondinoE.ScolobigA.BorgaM.AlbrechtF.MårdJ.WeyrichP.Di BaldassarreG. (2020). Exploring changes in hydrogeological risk awareness and preparedness over time: A case study in northeastern Italy. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(7), 1049–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1729361
46.
MondinoE.ScolobigA.BorgaM.Di BaldassarreG. (2021). Longitudinal survey data for diversifying temporal dynamics in flood risk modelling. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 21(9), 2811–2828. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2811-2021
47.
MooreN. a. d.BrehmJ.BreidenbachP.GhoshA.GruhlH. (2022). Flood risk perception after indirect flooding experience: Null results in the German housing market. Ruhr economic papers: #976. RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. https://doi.org/10.4419/96973141
48.
OsberghausD. (2015). The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany—Evidence from a nationwide survey. Ecological Economics, 110, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010
49.
OsberghausD. (2017). The effect of flood experience on household mitigation—Evidence from longitudinal and insurance data. Global Environmental Change, 43, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.003
50.
OsberghausD.AchtnichtM.BubeckP.FrondelM.KükenthalV.LaryschT.ThiekenA. H. (2020). Klimawandel in Deutschland: Risikowahrnehmung und anpassung in privaten haushalten 2020: Ergebnisse und Fragebogen einer Haushaltsbefragung in Deutschland. ZEW-Gutachten Und Forschungsberichte.
PoussinJ. K.BotzenW. J. W.AertsJ. C. J. H. (2014). Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013
RichertC.ErdlenbruchK.FiguièresC. (2017). The determinants of households’ flood mitigation decisions in France-on the possibility of feedback effects from past investments. Ecological Economics, 131, 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.014
55.
RidolfiE.AlbrechtF.Di BaldassarreG. (2020). Exploring the role of risk perception in influencing flood losses over time. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1677907
RogersR. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitute change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). The Guilford Press.
58.
RogersR. W.Prentice-DunnS. (1997). Protection motivation theory. In GochmanD. S. (Ed.), Handbook of health behavior research 1: Personal and social determinants (pp. 113–132). Wiley Online Library.
59.
SeebauerS.BabcickyP. (2021). (Almost) all quiet over one and a half years: A longitudinal study on causality between key determinants of private flood mitigation. Risk Analysis, 41(6), 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13598
TerpstraT.LindellM. K. (2013). Citizens’ perceptions of flood hazard adjustments. Environment and Behavior, 45(8), 993–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512452427
63.
ThiekenA. H.BubeckP.HeidenreichA.von KeyserlingkJ.DillenardtL.OttoA. (2023). Performance of the flood warning system in Germany in July 2021–insights from affected residents. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 23(2), 973–990.
64.
ThiekenA. H.MüllerM.KreibichH.MerzB. (2005). Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from theAugust2002 flood in Germany. Water Resources Research, 41(12), Article W12430. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004177
65.
United Nations. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030.
66.
van ValkengoedA. M.StegL. (2019). Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0371-y
67.
WachingerG.RennO.BeggC.KuhlickeC. (2013). The risk perception paradox–implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
WeinsteinN. D.RothmanA. J.NicolichM. (1998). Use of correlational data to examine the effects of risk perceptions on precautionary behavior. Psychology & Health, 13(3), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407305
70.
WinsemiusH. C.AertsJ. C. J. H.van BeekL. P. H.BierkensM. F. P.BouwmanA.JongmanB.KwadijkJ. C. J.LigtvoetW.LucasP. L.van VuurenD. P.WardP. J. (2016). Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Climate Change, 6(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893
71.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
