The COVID-19 pandemic has hit humanity globally. Besides its obvious threats to our physical health and economic stability, one can only speculate about the pandemic’s and its countermeasures’ psychosocial impacts. Here, we took advantage of a sample of healthy male participants who had completed psychosocial measures on mental health, environmental concern, and prejudice against asylum-seekers just before and during the nationwide lockdown in Germany in spring 2020. A follow-up assessment of 140 participants during the lockdown provided a unique opportunity to track psychosocial changes in a prospective longitudinal study design. In comparison to before the lockdown (1) mental health worsened, (2) environmental concern increased, and (3) prejudice against asylum-seekers decreased. Our study demonstrates psychosocial “side effects” of the pandemic that bring both challenges and opportunities for our society with regard to the handling of psychological reactions to this pandemic and further global crises, including climate change and mass migration.
AchebakH.PetetinH.Quijal-ZamoranoM.BowdaloD.García-PandoC. P.BallesterJ. (2020). Reduction in air pollution and attributable mortality due to COVID-19 lockdown. The Lancet. Planetary Health, 4(7), e268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30148-0
2.
AlcockI.WhiteM. P.PahlS.Duarte-DavidsonR.FlemingL. E. (2020). Associations between pro-environmental behaviour and neighbourhood nature, nature visit frequency and nature appreciation: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in England. Environment International, 136, 105441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105441
3.
AndersonJ.FergusonR. (2018). Demographic and ideological correlates of negative attitudes towards asylum seekers: A meta-analytic review. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12162
4.
AndersonJ. R. (2018). The prejudice against asylum seekers scale: Presenting the psychometric properties of a new measure of classical and conditional attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(6), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1404958
5.
BeagleholeB.MulderR. T.FramptonC. M.BodenJ. M.Newton-HowesG.BellC. J. (2018). Psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after natural disasters: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 213(6), 716–722. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.210
BöhmR.TheelenM. M.RuschH.van LangeP. A. (2018). Costs, needs, and integration efforts shape helping behavior toward refugees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(28), 7284–7289. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805601115
9.
BonannoG. A.BrewinC. R.KaniastyK.GrecaA. M. (2010). Weighing the costs of disaster: Consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387086
10.
BrooksS. K.WebsterR. K.SmithL. E.WoodlandL.WesselyS.GreenbergN.RubinG. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
11.
BuzziC.TucciM.CiprandiR.BrambillaI.CaimmiS.CiprandiG.MarsegliaG. L. (2020). The psycho-social effects of COVID-19 on Italian adolescents’ attitudes and behaviors. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 46(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00833-4
12.
DerogatisL. R. (1977). SCL-90-R, administration, scoring & procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (self published). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
13.
DerogatisL. R. (2000). Brief symptom inventory-18. Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. NCS Pearson, INC.
DouglasM.KatikireddiS. V.TaulbutM.McKeeM.McCartneyG. (2020). Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response. BMJ, 369, m1557. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1557
16.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 1–34). Academic Press.
17.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.SaguyT. (2007). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 296–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701726132
18.
DunlapR. E.van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176
FrankeG. H. (2000). BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory—Deutsche version. Manual. Beltz.
21.
FrankeG. H.JaegerS.GlaesmerH.BarkmannC.PetrowskiK.BraehlerE. (2017). Psychometric analysis of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a representative German sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0283-3
22.
GanY.MaJ.WuJ.ChenY.ZhuH.HallB. J. (2020). Immediate and delayed psychological effects of province-wide lockdown and personal quarantine during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Psychological Medicine, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720003116
23.
GarciaD.RiméB. (2019). Collective emotions and social resilience in the digital traces after a terrorist attack. Psychological Science, 30(4), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619831964
24.
GneezyA.ImasA.BrownA.NelsonL. D.NortonM. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1437
25.
GobbiS.PłomeckaM. B.AshrafZ.RadzińskiP.NeckelsR.LazzeriS.DedićA.BakalovićA.HrustićL.SkórkoB.Es HaghiS.AlmazidouK.Rodríguez-PinoL.AlpA. B.JabeenH.WallerV.ShibliD.BehnamM. A.ArshadA. H.. . . JawaidA. (2020). Worsening of preexisting psychiatric conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 581426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.581426
26.
GruberJ.PrinsteinM. J.ClarkL. A.RottenbergJ.AbramowitzJ. S.AlbanoA. M.AldaoA.BorelliJ. L.ChungT.DavilaJ.ForbesE. E.GeeD. G.HallG. C. N.HallionL. S.HinshawS. P.HofmannS. G.HollonS. D.JoormannJ.KazdinA. E.. . . WeinstockL. M. (2021). Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action. American Psychologist, 76, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000707
27.
HawcroftL. J.MilfontT. L. (2010). The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003
28.
HoreshD.Kapel Lev-AriR.Hasson-OhayonI. (2020). Risk factors for psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel: Loneliness, age, gender, and health status play an important role. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(4), 925–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12455
29.
HuangC.WangY.LiX.RenL.ZhaoJ.HuY.ZhangL.FanG.XuJ.GuX.ChengZ.YuT.XiaJ.WeiY.WuW.XieX.YinW.LiH.LiuM.CaoB. (2020). Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5
30.
IasevoliF.FornaroM.D’UrsoG.GallettaD.CasellaC.PaternosterM.BuccelliC.de BartolomeisA. (2020). Psychological distress in patients with serious mental illness during the COVID-19 outbreak and one-month mass quarantine in Italy. Psychological Medicine, 51, 1054–1056. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001841
Johns Hopkins University. (2020). COVID-19 dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). https://coronavirus.jhu.edu
35.
JohnsonT.DawesC.FowlerJ.SmirnovO. (2020). Slowing COVID-19 transmission as a social dilemma: Lessons for government officials from interdisciplinary research on cooperation. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.150
36.
KanniahK. D.Kamarul ZamanN. A. F.KaskaoutisD. G.LatifM. T. (2020). COVID-19’s impact on the atmospheric environment in the Southeast Asia region. The Science of the Total Environment, 736, 139658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139658
37.
KiesnerJ.Eisenlohr-MoulT.MendleJ. (2020). Evolution, the menstrual cycle, and theoretical overreach. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1113–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906440
38.
KimA. W.NyengeraiT.MendenhallE. (2020). Evaluating the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceived risk of COVID-19 infection and childhood trauma predict adult depressive symptoms in urban South Africa. Psychological Medicine, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720003414
39.
KocY.AndersonJ. R. (2018). Social distance toward syrian refugees: The role of intergroup anxiety in facilitating positive relations. Journal of Social Issues, 74(4), 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12299
40.
LangenbachB. P.BergerS.BaumgartnerT.KnochD. (2020). Cognitive resources moderate the relationship between pro-environmental attitudes and green behavior. Environment and Behavior, 52(9), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519843127
LiY.WangY.JiangJ.ValdimarsdóttirU. A.FallK.FangF.SongH.LuD.ZhangW. (2020). Psychological distress among health professional students during the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychological Medicine, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000714
43.
LuoM.GuoL.YuM.JiangW.WangH. (2020). The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 291, 113190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113190
44.
MaillardJ.-C.GonzalezJ.-P. (2006). Biodiversity and emerging diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1081, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1373.001
45.
MakiA.DwyerP. C.BlazekS.SnyderM.GonzálezR.LayS. (2019). Responding to natural disasters: Examining identity and prosociality in the context of a major earthquake. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12281
46.
MazzaM. G.De LorenzoR.ConteC.PolettiS.VaiB.BollettiniI.MelloniE. M. T.FurlanR.CiceriF.Rovere-QueriniP.BenedettiF. (2020). Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 89, 594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.037
47.
MilinskiM.SommerfeldR. D.KrambeckH.-J.ReedF. A.MarotzkeJ. (2008). The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(7), 2291–2294. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709546105
48.
PfattheicherS.NockurL.BöhmR.SassenrathC.PetersenM. B. (2020). The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Science, 31(11), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620964422
49.
PierceM.HopeH.FordT.HatchS.HotopfM.JohnA.KontopantelisE.WebbR.WesselyS.McManusS.AbelK. M. (2020). Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(10), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4
50.
PrataJ. C.SilvaA. L. P.WalkerT. R.DuarteA. C.Rocha-SantosT. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on the use and management of plastics. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(13), 7760–7765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02178
51.
PrestiG.McHughL.GlosterA.KareklaM.HayesS. C. (2020). The dynamics of fear at the time of COVID-19: A contextual behavioral science perspective. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.36131/CN20200206
SchillerB.BaumgartnerT.KnochD. (2014). Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 169–175. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.12.006
56.
SchillerB.KleinertT.Teige-MocigembaS.KlauerK. C.HeinrichsM. (2020a). Temporal dynamics of resting EEG networks are associated with prosociality. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69999-5
57.
SchillerB.DomesG.HeinrichsM. (2020b). Oxytocin changes behavior and spatio-temporal brain dynamics underlying inter-group conflict in humans. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.109
58.
Schleyer-LindenmannA.IttnerH.DauvierB.PiolatM. (2018). Die NEP-Skala – hinter den (deutschen) Kulissen des Umweltbewusstseins. Diagnostica, 64(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000202
59.
ShanahanL.SteinhoffA.BechtigerL.MurrayA. L.NivetteA.HeppU.RibeaudD.EisnerM. (2020). Emotional distress in young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence of risk and resilience from a longitudinal cohort study. Psychological Medicine, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000241X
60.
SibleyC. G.GreavesL. M.SatherleyN.WilsonM. S.OverallN. C.MilojevP.BulbuliaJ.OsborneD.MilfontT. L.HoukamauC. A.DuckI. M.Vickers-JonesR.BarlowF. K. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. American Psychologist, 75(5), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000662
61.
SilverR. C.HolmanE. A.McIntoshD. N.PoulinM.Gil-RivasV. (2002). Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(10), 1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.10.1235
62.
SpitzerC.HammerS.LöweB.GrabeH.BarnowS.RoseM.WingenfeldK.FreybergerH.FrankeG. (2011). Die Kurzform des Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18): Erste Befunde zu den psychometrischen Kennwerten der deutschen Version. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie, 79(09), 517–523. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281602
TangB.LiuX.LiuY.XueC.ZhangL. (2014). A meta-analysis of risk factors for depression in adults and children after natural disasters. BMC Public Health, 14, 623. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-623
65.
TaylorS. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00451.x
van BavelJ. J.BaickerK.BoggioP. S.CapraroV.CichockaA.CikaraM.CrockettM. J.CrumA. J.DouglasK. M.DruckmanJ. N.DruryJ.DubeO.EllemersN.FinkelE. J.FowlerJ. H.GelfandM.HanS.HaslamS. A.JettenJ.. . . WillerR. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
70.
van de GroepS.ZanolieK.GreenK. H.SweijenS. W.CroneE. A. (2020). A daily diary study on adolescents’ mood, empathy, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 15(10), e0240349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240349
71.
WangH.HuangD.HuangH.ZhangJ.GuoL.LiuY.MaH.GengQ. (2020). The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on medical staff in Guangdong, China: A cross-sectional study. Psychological Medicine, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002561
ZacherH.RudolphC. W. (2021). Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000702
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
