The present study adopted a quasi-experimental mixed method approach to investigate the influence of an improved school ground on children’s academic performance. In total, 123 children from two (intervention and control) primary schools in Bangladesh participated. In the intervention school, a barren school ground was redesigned with several behavior settings (e.g., gardens and amphitheater) for teaching and learning. Treatment group children (n = 29) received math and science classes outdoors, while a comparison group (n = 32) received usual indoor classes. A control school with no changes to the outdoor environment was included (n = 62). The redesigned school ground was associated with higher levels of academic attainment. Furthermore, all intervention schoolchildren perceived more opportunities to explore in the redesigned school ground. Qualitative insights suggest the diverse settings provided more opportunities to explore, experiment, and work collaboratively. These results highlight the potential for school ground design to contribute to improvement of children’s academic attainment in developing countries.
ArtinoA. R.La RochelleJ. S.DezeeK. J.GehlbachH. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research. Medical Teacher, 36, 463–474. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814
2.
Bangladesh Bureau of Educational Information and Statistics. (2014). Basic Education Statistics 2014. Dhaka: Author.
3.
BrowningM. H. E. M.KuoM.SachdevaS.LeeK.WestphalL. (2018). Greenness and school-wide test scores are not always positively associated—A replication of “linking student performance in Massachusetts elementary schools with the “greenness” of school surroundings using remote sensing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 69–72. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.007
4.
ChawlaL.KeenaK.PevecI.StanleyE. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health & Place, 28, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001
5.
ChowdhuryJ. H.ChowdhuryD. K.HoqueM. S.AhmadS.SultanaT. (2009). Participatory evaluation: Causes of primary school drop-out. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Primary and Mass Education.
6.
CoscoN. G. (2006) Motivation to move : physical activity affordances in preschool play areas (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh.
7.
DadvandP.NieuwenhuijsenM. J.EsnaolaM.FornsJ.BasagañaX.Alvarez-PedrerolM.… SunyerJ. (2015). Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 201503402. doi:10.1073/pnas.1503402112
8.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2013). IBM Statistics 21 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
9.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
GriffeeD. (2001). Questionnaire translation and questionnaire validation: Are they the same?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
11.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
HopkinsK. D.WeeksD. L. (1990). Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: Their place in research reporting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 717–729. doi:10.1177/0013164490504001
13.
InhelderB.PiagetJ. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
KelzC.EvansG. W.RodererK. (2013). The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard: A multi-methodological, quasi-experimental study in rural Austrian middle schools. Environment and Behavior, 20(10), 1–21.
16.
KhanM. (2012). Outdoor as learning environment for children at a government primary school in Bangladesh (Master’s thesis). Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.
17.
KhanM.BellS.McGeownS.Silveirinha de OliveiraE. (2019). Designing an outdoor learning environment for and with a primary school community: A case study in Bangladesh. Landscape Research, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2019.1569217
18.
KhanM.BellS.McGeownS.Silveirinha de OliveiraE. (in preparation). Designing school grounds as a place for pedagogy and play.
19.
KhanM.McGeownS. P.IslamM. Z. (2019). “There is no better way to study science than to collect and analyse data in your own yard”: Outdoor classrooms and primary school children in Bangladesh. Children’s Geographies, 17, 217–230. doi:10.1080/14733285.2018.1490007
20.
KingN.HorrocksC.BrooksJ. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
21.
KruegerR.CaseyM. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
KuoM.BrowningM. H. E. M.SachdevaS.LeeK.WestphalL. (2018). Might school performance grow on trees? Examining the link between “greenness” and academic achievement in urban, high-poverty schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1669. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01669
23.
KweonB.-S.EllisC. D.LeeJ.JacobsK. (2017). The link between school environments and student academic performance. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 23, 35–43. doi:10.1016/J.UFUG.2017.02.002
24.
Lewis-BeckM.BrymanA. E.LiaoT. F. (2003). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
LiD.SullivanW. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015
26.
LiebermanG. A.HoodyL. L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. Results of a nationwide study. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environment Roundtable.
27.
LiebermanG. A.HoodyL. L.LiebermanG. M. (2000). California student assessment project-The effects of environment-based education on student achievement. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environment Roundtable.
28.
LiebermanG. A.HoodyL. L.LiebermanG. M. (2005). California student assessment project phase two: The effects of environment-based education on student achievement. San Diego, CA: State Education and Environment Roundtable.
29.
LopezR.CampbellR.JenningsJ. (2008). Schoolyard improvements and standardized test scores: An ecological analysis. Boston, MA: Gastón Institute Publications.
30.
MatsuokaR. H. (2010). Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.011
31.
Ministry of Primary and Mass Education. (2016). Annual primary school census 2016. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Directorate of Primary Education.
32.
MooreR. C.WongH. H. (1997). Natural learning: The life history of an environmental schoolyard. Creating environments for rediscovering nature’s way of teaching. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications.
33.
PalavanO.CicekV.AtabayM. (2016). Perspectives of elementary school teachers on outdoor education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4, 1885–1893. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040819
34.
PallantJ. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Berkshire, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
35.
PiagetJ. (1964). Development and learning. In RippleR. E.RockcastleV. N. (Eds.), Piaget rediscovered (pp. 7–20). New York, NY: Cornell University.
36.
SamborskiS. (2010). Biodiverse or barren school grounds: Their effects on children. Children Youth & Environments, 20, 67–115.
37.
SilveirinhadeOliveiraE.AspinallP.BriggsA.CumminsS.LeylandA. H.MitchellR.. . . ThompsonC. (2013). How effective is the Forestry Commission Scotland’s woodland improvement programme—“Woods In and Around Towns” (WIAT)—at improving psychological well-being in deprived urban communities? A quasi-experimental study. BMJ Open, 3(8), e003648. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003648
38.
SingalN.SwannM. (2011). Children’s perceptions of themselves as learner inside and outside school. Research Papers in Education, 26, 469–484. doi:10.1080/02671520903281617
39.
SivarajahS.SmithS. M.ThomasS. C. (2018). Tree cover and species composition effects on academic performance of primary school students. PLoS ONE, 13(2), 1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193254
40.
VygotskyL. S.ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
WellsN. M.MyersB. M.ToddL. E.BaraleK.GaolachB.FerenzG.. . . FalkE. (2015). The effects of school gardens on children’s science knowledge: A randomized controlled trial of low-income elementary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 2858–2878. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1112048
42.
WoodD. (1998). Understanding Children’s Worlds: How children think and learn—The social contexts of cognitive development (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43.
WuX.AndersonR. C.Nguyen-JahielK.MillerB. (2013). Enhancing motivation and engagement through collaborative discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 622–632. doi:10.1037/a0032792
44.
ZamanM. M. (2014). Dropout at primary and secondary level: A challenge to ensure rights to education for the government of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Brac University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
