In this study, we adopted a novel objective measure of attitude strength based on observable responses, and empirically tested the role of attitude strength in the relationship between environmental attitude and willingness to pay (WTP) for improving air visibility. We proposed the moderating role of environmental attitude strength in the relationship of environmental attitude to WTP, and empirically tested it in a survey on air visibility on a sample of 652 residents in Beijing, China. Our main finding was that the translation of environmental attitude into WTP was 61% less when the same level of environmental attitude was weakly held rather than strongly held. We also investigated the relationships of individual difference variables to environmental attitude strength, showing the interaction of value orientation, environmental knowledge, need for cognitive closure, and demographic factors.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273-291. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
2.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT.RothengatterJ. A. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 265-276. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
3.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
4.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888
5.
AmemiyaT. (1977). A note on a heteroscedastic model. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 365-370. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(77)90006-9
6.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
7.
BambergS.SchmidtP. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35, 264-285. doi:10.1177/0013916502250134
8.
BangH. K.EllingerA.HarjimarcouJ.TraichalP. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 449-468. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200006)17:6<449::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-8
9.
BarberN.TaylorC.StrickS. (2009). Wine consumers’ environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on willingness to purchase. International Journal of Wine Research, 1, 59-72. doi:10.2147/IJWR.S4649
10.
BardenJ.PettyR. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 489-509. doi:10.1037/a0012559
11.
BassiliJ. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637-653. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637
12.
BassiliJ. N.KrosnickJ. A. (2000). Do strength-related attitude properties determine susceptibility to response effects? New evidence from response latency, attitude extremity, and aggregate indices. Political Psychology, 21, 107-132. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00179
13.
BizerG. Y.KrosnickJ. A.HolbrookA. L.WheelerS. C.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2004). The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: The effects of need to evaluate. Journal of Personality, 72, 995-1028. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00288.x
14.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.MorrisK. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805
15.
ChandrashekaranM.RotteK.GrewalR. (2005). Knowledge in error: Decoding consumer judgments with the JUMP model. In KardesF. R.HerrP. M.NantelJ. (Eds.), Applying social cognition to consumer-focused strategy (pp. 97-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
ChandrashekaranM.RotteK.TaxS. S.GrewalR. (2007). Satisfaction strength and customer loyalty. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 153-163. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.153
17.
ClarksonJ. J.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2008). A new look at the consequences of attitude certainty: The amplification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 810-825. doi:10.1037/a0013192
18.
de GrootJ. I. M.StegL. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 368-378. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
19.
de GrootJ. I. M.ThogersenJ. (2013). Values and pro-environmental behaviour. In StegL.van den BergA. E.de GrootJ. I. M. (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 151-152). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
de LeeuwA.ValoisP.AjzenI.SchmidtP. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128-138. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
EatonA. A.MajkaE. A.VisserP. S. (2008). Emerging perspectives on the structure and function of attitude strength. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 165-201. doi:10.1080/10463280802383791
23.
EatonA. A.VisserP. S.BurnsV. (2017). How gender-role salience influences attitude strength and persuasive message processing. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 223-239. doi:10.1177/0361684317696257
24.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacDonaldT. K. (2010). Distinguishing between prediction and influence: Multiple processes underlying attitude-behavior consistency. In AgnewC. R.CarlstonD. E.GrazianoW. G.KellyJ. R. (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 162-185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603
26.
FazioR. H.PowellM. C.WilliamsC. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 280-288. doi:10.1086/209214
27.
FranssonN.GärlingT. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
28.
FryxellG. E.LoC. W. H. (2003). The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviours on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 45-69. doi:10.1023/A:1024773012398
29.
GaoY.MattilaA. S.LeeS. (2016). A meta-analysis of behavioral intentions for environment-friendly initiatives in hospitality research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 54, 107-115. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.01.010
30.
HoweL. C.KrosnickJ. A. (2017). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 327-351. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600
31.
KrosnickJ. A. (1989). Attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 297-308. doi:10.1177/0146167289153002
32.
KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
KrosnickJ. A.SmithW. A. (1994). Attitude strength. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 279-289). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
KruglanskiA. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
35.
KruglanskiA. W.FishmanS. (2009). The need for cognitive closure. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 343-353). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M. (1991). Group members’ reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-225. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.212
37.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.”Psychological Review, 103, 263-283. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
38.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M.KlemA. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
39.
KwonJ.NayakankuppamD. (2015). Strength without elaboration: The role of implicit self-theories in forming and accessing attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 316-339. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv019
40.
LiobikienėG.JuknysR. (2016). The role of values, environmental risk perception, awareness of consequences, and willingness to assume responsibility for environmentally-friendly behaviour: The Lithuanian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3413-3422. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.049
41.
LiuS.ChiangY. T.TsengC. C.NgE.YehG. L.FangW. T. (2018). The theory of planned behavior to predict protective behavioral intentions against PM2.5 in parents of young children from urban and rural Beijing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2215. doi:10.3390/ijerph15102215
42.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2016). Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63(6), 56-68. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.008
43.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP.WagnerB. C. (2016). Making it moral: Merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65(9), 82-93. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003
44.
MaheswaranD.ChaikenS. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.13
45.
MaloneyM. P.WardM. P.BrauchtG. N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 30, 787-790. doi:10.1037/h0084394
46.
McIntyreA.MilfontT. L. (2016). Who cares? Measuring environmental attitudes. In GiffordR. (Ed.), Research methods for environmental psychology (pp. 93-114). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
47.
MilfontT. L.DuckittJ. (2004). The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 289-303. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.001
48.
MilfontT. L.DuckittJ. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80-94. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001
49.
MilfontT. L.GouveiaV. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72-82. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001
50.
MuthukrishnanA. V.PhamM. T.MungaleA. (2001). Does greater amount of information always bolster attitudinal resistance?Marketing Letters, 12, 131-144. doi:10.1023/A:1011113002473
51.
NordlundA. M.GarvillJ. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740-756. doi:10.1177/001391602237244
52.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
53.
PettyR. E.HaugtvedtC. P.SmithS. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Ohio State University Series on Attitudes and Persuasion: Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4, pp. 93-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.). (1995). Ohio State University Series on Attitudes and Persuasion: Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
PettyR. E.WegenerD. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 37-72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
56.
PolonskyM. J.VocinoA.GrauS. L.GarmaR.FerdousA. S. (2012). The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of U.S. consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 28, 238-263. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2012.659279
57.
QianC.ChandrashekaranM.YuK. (2015). Understanding the role of consumer heterogeneity in the formation of satisfaction uncertainty. Psychology & Marketing, 32, 78-93. doi:10.1002/mar.20764
58.
RoetsA.KruglanskiA. W.KossowskaM.PierroA.HongY. Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221-283. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001
59.
RoetsA.Van HielA. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90-94. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004
60.
RotteK.ChandrashekaranM.TaxS. S.GrewalR. (2006). Forgiven but not forgotten: Covert uncertainty in overt responses and the paradox of defection-despite-trust. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 281-294. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_10
61.
RuckerD. D.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2014). Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 119-136. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001
62.
SanbonmatsuD. M.KardesF. R.HerrP. M. (1992). The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 76-91. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90005-R
63.
SawickiV.WegenerD. T. (2018). Metacognitive reflection as a moderator of attitude strength versus attitude bolstering: Implications for attitude similarity and attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 638-652. doi:10.1177/0146167217744196
64.
SchahnJ.HolzerE. (1990). Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender, and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22, 767-786. doi:10.1177/0013916590226003
65.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327-339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
66.
SchultzP. W.GouveiaV. V.CameronL. D.TankhaG.SchmuckP.FraněkM. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457-475. doi:10.1177/0022022105275962
67.
ShenJ.SaijoT. (2008). Reexamining the relations between socio-demographic characteristics and individual environmental concern: Evidence from Shanghai data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 42-50. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.003
68.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.SargisE. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 895-917. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895
69.
SmithE. R.MillerF. D. (1983). Mediation among attributional inferences and comprehension processes: Initial findings and a general method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 492-505. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.3.492
70.
SmithS. M.FabrigarL. R.MacdougallB. L.WiesenthalN. L. (2008). The role of amount, cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 280-295. doi:10.1002/ejsp.447
71.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
72.
SternP. C.DietzT.KalofL. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348. doi:10.1177/0013916593255002
73.
TormalaZ. L.ClarksonJ. J.HendersonM. D. (2011). Does fast or slow evaluation foster greater certainty?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 422-434. doi:10.1177/0146167210397378
74.
TormalaZ. L.DeSensiV. (2009). The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: A matching perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 114-125.
75.
TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 469-492. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x
76.
van RiperC. J. V.KyleG. T. (2014). Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 288-297. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.002
77.
VisserP. S.BizerG. Y.KrosnickJ. A. (2006). Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 1-67. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38001-X
78.
VisserP. S.KrosnickJ. A. (1998). Development of attitude strength over the life cycle: Surge and decline. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1389-1410. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1389
79.
VisserP. S.KrosnickJ. A.SimmonsJ. P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 118-141. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00522-X
80.
WisemanM.BognerF. X. (2003). A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 783-794. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00071-5
81.
YuK.ChenZ.GaoJ.ZhangY.WangS.ChaiF. (2015). Relationship between objective and subjective atmospheric visibility and its influence on willingness to accept or pay in China. PLoS ONE, 10(10), E0139495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139495
82.
YuX. (2014). Is environment “a city thing” in China? Rural–urban differences in environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38(6), 39-48. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.009
