Many interventions designed to curb energy use are ineffective because they fail to inspire individuals to engage in proenvironmental behavior and interact meaningfully with energy information. This field experiment targeted individuals’ personal motivations and goals in combination with sensor-recorded energy feedback to decrease electricity and water consumption. Residents from 77 “smart” apartments were randomly assigned to attend a multifaceted motivational program and set action-oriented energy goals. Participants were also randomly assigned to receive interactive energy feedback. Continuous electricity and water data were then collected for 3 months. Those who received the motivational intervention used significantly less hot water than those who did not receive the intervention. Moreover, those exposed to action-focused feedback used significantly less electricity than those who did not receive the feedback—an effect that was more pronounced in the motivation condition. Results support the use of interventions directed at personal proenvironmental motivations and action-focused group goals.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273-291. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
2.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 265-276. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
3.
AllcottH.RogersT. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review, 104, 3003-3037.
4.
AsensioO. I.DelmasM. A. (2015). Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, E510-E515.
5.
AsensioO. I.DelmasM. A. (2016). The dynamics of behavior change: Evidence from energy conservation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126(Pt. A), 196-212.
6.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 27, 14-25.
7.
BeckerL. J. (1978). Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 428-433. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.428
8.
BertoldiP.RicciA.de AlmeidaA. (Eds.). (2001). Energy efficiency in household appliances and lighting. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56531-1
9.
BirdS.HernandezD. (2012). Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. Energy Policy, 48, 506-514.
10.
CheonS. H.ReeveJ.MoonI. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 365-396. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.3.365
11.
CookeA. N.FieldingK. S.LouisW. R. (2016). Environmentally active people: The role of autonomy, relatedness, competence and self-determined motivation. Environmental Education Research, 22, 631-657. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1054262
12.
CostaD. L.KahnM. E. (2013). Energy conservation nudges and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 311, 680-702. doi:10.1111/jeea.12011
13.
DahlA. L. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14-19. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032
14.
DarnerR. (2009). Self-determination theory as a guide to fostering environmental motivation. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 39-49. doi:10.3200/JOEE.40.2.39-49
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49, 182-185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
16.
DelmasM. A.FischleinM.AsensioO. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729-739.
17.
DeOreoW. B.MayerP.DziegielewskiB.KieferJ. (2016). Residential end uses of water, version 2 (Executive report). Denver, CO: Water Research Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.waterrf.org/PublicReportLibrary/4309A.pdf
18.
DeShonR. P.KozlowskiS. W.SchmidtA. M.MilnerK. R.WiechmannD. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of applied psychology, 89, 1035.
19.
DickersonC. A.ThibodeauR.AronsonE.MillerD. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841-854. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00928.x
20.
FischerC. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy?. Energy efficiency, 1, 79-104.
21.
FishbachA.EyalT.FinkelsteinS. R. (2010). How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 517-530. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00285.x
22.
GellerH.HarringtonP.RosenfeldA. H.TanishimaS.UnanderF. (2006). Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34, 556-573. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.010
23.
Green-DemersI.PelletierL. G.MenardS. (1997). The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 157-166. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.29.3.157
24.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2011). Feedback on household electricity consumption: Learning and social influence processes. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 138-145. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00967.x
25.
HardingM.HsiawA. (2014). Goal setting and energy conservation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107(Pt. A), 209-227.
26.
HargreavesT.NyeM.BurgessJ. (2010). Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, 38, 6111-6119. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.068
KlugerA. N.DeNisiA. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
29.
KoestnerR.OtisN.PowersT. A.PelletierL.GagnonH. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76, 1201-1230. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00519.x
30.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00519.x
31.
LarsonL. R.StedmanR. C.CooperC. B.DeckerD. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112-124.
32.
LavergneK. J.SharpE. C.PelletierL. G.HoltbyA. (2010). The role of perceived government style in the facilitation of self-determined and non self-determined motivation for pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 169-177. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.002
33.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
34.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current directions in psychological science, 15, 265-268.
35.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.). (2013). New developments in goal setting and task performance. New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
LutzenhiserL. (2008, November7-9). Setting the stage: Why behavior is important. Overview of address given to the Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference, Delivered to California Senate, Sacramento, CA.
37.
McCalleyL. T. (2006). From motivation and cognition theories to everyday applications and back again: The case of product-integrated information and feedback. Energy Policy, 34, 129-137. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.024
38.
McCalleyL. T.MiddenC. J. (2002). Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation. Journal of economic psychology, 23, 589-603.
39.
OsbaldistonR.SheldonK. M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of environmental psychology, 23, 349-357.
40.
PelletierL. G.BaxterD.HutaV. (2011). Personal autonomy and environmental sustainability. In ChirkovV. I.RyanR.SheldonK. M. (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context (pp. 257-277). Rotterdam: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9667-8
41.
PelletierL. G.SharpE. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 210-217. doi:10.1037/a0012755
42.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.Green-DemersI.NoelsK.BeatonA. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437-468. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
43.
PetersenJ. E.FrantzC. M.ShamminM. R.YanischT. M.TincknellE.MyersN. (2015). Electricity and water conservation on college and university campuses in response to national competitions among dormitories: Quantifying relationships between behavior, conservation strategies and psychological metrics. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0144070. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144070
44.
PetersenJ. E.ShunturovV.JandaK.PlattG.WeinbergerK. (2007). Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8, 16-33. doi:10.1108/14676370710717562
45.
ReeveJ. (2015). Understanding motivation and emotion (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
46.
RyanR. M.DeciE. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68
47.
StaatsH.HarlandP.WilkeH. A. (2004). Effecting durable change: A team approach to improve environmental behavior in the household. Environment and Behavior, 36, 341-367. doi:10.1177/0013916503260163
48.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
SuY. L.ReeveJ. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Education Psychology Review, 23, 159-188. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7
50.
SweeneyJ. C.WebbD.MazzarolT. W.SoutarG. N. (2014). Self-determination theory and word of mouth about energy-saving behaviors: An online experiment. Psychology & Marketing, 31, 698-716. doi:10.1002/mar.20729
51.
U.S. Department of Energy & U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2017). Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/
52.
WebbD.SoutarG. N.MazzarolT.SaldarisP. (2013). Self-determination theory and consumer behavioural change: Evidence from a household energy-saving behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59-66. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.003
53.
WhillansA. V.CarusoE. M.DunnE. W. (2017). Both selfishness and selflessness start with the self: How wealth shapes responses to charitable appeals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 242-250. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.009
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
