Dialectical beliefs emphasize constant change, tolerance of contradiction, and holistic perception. This research examined the relationship between dialectical beliefs and proenvironmental behaviors. Study 1a showed that stronger dialectical beliefs were associated with fewer proenvironmental behaviors among Chinese participants; this result was replicated in Study 1b. To examine the negative relationship between dialectical beliefs and proenvironmental behaviors across cultures, Study 2 recruited both native Chinese and European Americans and replicated the results conceptually by measuring proenvironmental behaviors in a hypothetical shopping scenario. Study 3 provided further generally supportive evidence by considering the influence of both dialectical beliefs and interdependent self-construal on proenvironmental behaviors between native Chinese and European Canadians. Finally, a meta-analysis of the obtained results revealed a weak but significant negative association between dialectical beliefs and proenvironmental behaviors. Theoretical implications for cross-cultural environmental research and practical implications for proenvironmental campaigns were discussed.
BechtelR. B.Corral-VerdugoV.AsaiM.RiesleA. G. (2006). A cross-cultural study of environmental belief structures in USA, Japan, Mexico, and Peru. International Journal of Psychology, 41, 145-151. doi:10.1080/00207590500345401
2.
ChuangY.XieX.LiuC. (2016). Interdependent orientations increases pro-environmental preferences when facing self-interest conflicts: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 96-105. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.001
3.
ChungS.-S.PoonC.-S. (2001). A comparison of waste-reduction practices and new environmental paradigm of rural and urban Chinese citizens. Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 3-19. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0408
4.
ClaytonS.Devine-WrightP.SternP. C.WhitmarshL.CarricoA.StegL.. . . BonnesM. (2015). Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5, 640-646. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2622
5.
ClaytonS.Devine-WrightP.SwimJ.BonnesM.StegL.WhitmarshL.CarricoA. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71, 199-215. doi:10.1037/a0039482
6.
Corral-VerdugoV.CarrusG.BonnesM.MoserG.SinhaJ. B. P. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703-725. doi:10.1177/0013916507308786
7.
de KwaadstenietE. W.van DijkE.WitA.De CremerD.de RooijM. (2007). Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: Justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1648-1660. doi:10.1177/0146167207307490
8.
DiamantopoulosA.SchlegelmilchB. B.SinkovicsR. R.BohlenG. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465-480. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7
9.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
10.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176
11.
EbreoA.ViningJ. (2001). How similar are recycling and waste reduction? Future orientation and reasons for reducing waste as predictors of self-reported behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 424-448. doi:10.1177/00139160121973061
12.
EcklundE. H.ScheitleC. P.PeiferJ.BolgerD. (2017). Examining links between religion, evolution views, and climate change skepticism. Environment and Behavior, 49, 985-1006. doi:10.1177/0013916516674246
13.
EomK.KimH.ShermanD. K.IshiiK. (2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27, 1331-1339. doi:10.1177/0956797616660078
14.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56-62. doi:10.1177/0956797612449177
15.
FranssonN.GärlingT. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
16.
GiffordR. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290-302. doi:10.1037/a0023566
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157. doi:10.1002/ijop.12034
19.
GoslingE.WilliamsK. J. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 298-304. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005
20.
GuerinD.CreteJ.MercierJ. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the determinants of recycling behavior in the European countries. Social Science Research, 30, 195-218. doi:10.1006/ssre.2000.0694
21.
HadlerM.HallerM. (2011). Global activism and nationally driven recycling: The influence of world society and national contexts on public and private environmental behavior. International Sociology, 26, 315-345. doi:10.1177/0268580910392258
22.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 932-942. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
23.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
24.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
JiL.-J. (2008). The leopard cannot change his spots, or can he: Culture and the development of lay theories of change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 613-622. doi:10.1177/0146167207313935
JiL.-J.ZhangZ.GuoT. (2008). To buy or to sell: Cultural differences in stock market decisions based on stock price trends. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 399-413. doi:10.1002/bdm.595
29.
KaiserF. G.SchultzP. W.BerenguerJ.Corral-VerdugoV.TankhaG. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism: Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13, 288-297. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.288
30.
KashimaY.PaladinoA.MargettsE. A. (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 64-75. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.014
31.
KilbourneW.PickettG. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61, 885-893. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016
32.
KuhnenU.HannoverB.SchubertB. (2001). The semantic-procedural interface model of the self: The role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 397-409. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.397
33.
Levy-LeboyerC.BonnesM.ChaseJ.Ferreira-MarquesJ.PawlikK. (1996). Determinants of pro-environmental behaviors: A five-countries comparison. European Psychologist, 1, 123-129.
34.
LiL. M. W. (2018). Dialectical beliefs and savings tendency: Opposite patterns in good versus bad current status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 128-135. doi:10.1111/jasp.12496
35.
LiL. M. W.BondM. H. (2010). Value change: Analyzing national change in citizen secularism across four time periods in the World Values Survey. The Social Science Journal, 47, 294-306. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2009.12.004
36.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT.JiangF. (2016). Influence of cultural meaning system and socioeconomic change on indecisiveness in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 508-524. doi:10.1177/0022022116631824
37.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT.RussellM. J. (2014). The influence of cultural lay beliefs: Dialecticism and indecisiveness in European Canadians and Hong Kong Chinese. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 6-12. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.047
38.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT.RussellM. J. (2015). Culture and decision making: Investigating cultural variations in the East Asian and North American online decision-making processes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 183-191. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12099
39.
MargettsE. A.KashimaY. (2017). Spillover between pro-environmental behaviors: The role of resources and perceived similarity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 30-42. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.005
40.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
41.
Marquart-PyattS. T. (2012). Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Social Science Research, 41, 1085-1099. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.003
42.
MilfontT. L.SchultzP. W. (2016). Culture and the natural environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 194-199. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.009
43.
MilfontT. L.SibleyC. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 187-195. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006
44.
MilfontT. L.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Testing the moderating role of the components of norm activation on the relationship between values and environmental behaviors. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 124-131. doi:10.1177/0022022109350506
45.
MiyamotoY.RyffC. D. (2011). Cultural differences in the dialectical and non-dialectical emotional styles and their implications for health. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 22-39. doi:10.1080/02699931003612114
46.
NgA. H.HynieM. (2014). Cultural differences in indecisiveness: The role of naïve dialecticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 45-60. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.022
47.
PalmerJ. A.SuggateJ. (1996). Influences and experiences affecting the pro-environmental behavior of educators. Environmental Education Research, 2, 109-121. doi:10.1080/1350462960020110
48.
PannoA.CarrusG.MiricchioloF.MannettiL. (2015). Cognitive reappraisal and pro-environmental behavior: The role of global climate change perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 858-867. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2162
49.
PiraniE.SecondiL. (2011). Eco-friendly attitudes: What European citizens say and what they do. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 67-84.
50.
PisanoI.LubellM. (2017). Environmental behavior in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 30 countries. Environment and Behavior, 49, 31-58. doi:10.1177/0013916515600494
51.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
52.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327-339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
53.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Environmental attitudes and behaviors across cultures. In LonnerW. J.DinnelD. L.HayesS. A.SattlerD. N. (Eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 8, Chap. 4). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1070
54.
SchultzP. W.GouveiaV. V.CameronL. D.TankhaG.SchmuckP.FranekM. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 457-477. doi:10.1177/0022022105275962
55.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434.
56.
SchultzP. W.ShriverC.TabanicoJ. J.KhazianA. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31-42. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
57.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
58.
SchwartzS. H.BardiA.BianchiG. (2000). Value adaptation to the imposition and collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe. In RenshonS. A.DuckittJ. (Eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and cross cultural perspectives (pp. 217-237). London, England: Macmillan.
SingelisT. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014
61.
Spencer-RodgersJ.PengK.WangL.HouY. (2004). Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1416-1432. doi:10.1177/0146167204264243
62.
Spencer-RodgersJ.SrivastavaS.BoucherH. C.EnglishT.PaletzS. B.WangL.. . . PengK. (2018). The Dialectical Self Scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
63.
Spencer-RodgersJ.WilliamsM.PengK. (2010). Cultural influences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: A decade of empirical research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 296-312. doi:10.1177/1088868310362982
64.
SpinaR. R.JiL.-J.RossM.LiY.ZhangZ. (2010). Why best cannot last: Cultural differences in predicting regression toward the mean. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 153-162. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01310.x
65.
SternP. C. (1992). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302.
66.
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
67.
SternP. C.DietzT. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84. doi:101111/j154045601994tb02420x
68.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6, 81-97.
69.
SternP. C.DietzT.KalofL. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348. doi:10.1177/0013916593255002
70.
TamK. P. (2013). Dispositional empathy with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 92-104. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004
71.
WatsonK.HalseC. M. (2005). Environmental attitudes of pre-service teachers: A conceptual and methodological dilemma in cross-cultural data collection. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6, 59-71.
72.
ZavalL.MarkowitzE. M.WeberE. U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one’s legacy. Psychological Science, 26, 231-236. doi:10.1177/0956797614561266
73.
ZhangB.GalbraithN.YamaH.WangL.ManktelowK. I. (2015). Dialectical thinking: A cross-cultural study of Japanese, Chinese, and British students. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 771-779. doi:10.1080/20445911.2015.1025792
