Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-4
Testing the Impact of a Planning Policy Based on New Urbanist Planning Principles on Residents’ Sense of Community and Mental Health in Perth,Western Australia
There is growing concern that the built forms resulting from conventional suburban design may be adversely affecting the social well-being, sense of community, and psychological health of its residents. This study tested the premise that suburban neighborhood developments (n = 36) designed in accordance with a New Urbanist inspired planning policy in Perth, Western Australia, improved residents’ (n = 644) sense of community and mental health. Findings revealed that with each 10% increase in policy compliance, residents odds of experiencing high sense of community increased by 21% (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = [1.04, 1.41]) and low psychological distress increased by 14% (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = [1.01, 1.28]). These results add empirical input to the debate surrounding the rhetoric and purported social goals and benefits of the New Urbanism, indicating that implementation of its neo-traditionalist neighborhood design principles may help create the conditions for positive neighborhood sense of community and mental health.
Al-HindiK. F.TillK. E. (2001). (Re)placing the new urbanism debates: Toward an interdisciplinary research agenda. Urban Geography, 22, 189-201.
2.
AudiracI. (1999). Stated preference for pedestrian proximity: An assessment of new urbanist sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 53-66. doi:0.1177/0739456X9901900105
3.
BaumF.BushR.ModraC.MurrayC.CoxE.AlexanderK.PotterR. (2000). Epidemiology of participation: An Australian community study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54, 414-423. doi:10.1136/jech.54.6.414
4.
Bedimo-RungA.MowenA.CohenD. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2Suppl. 2), S159-S168. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
BerryH.RickwoodD. (2000). Measuring social capital at the individual level: Personal social capital, values and psychological distress. Journal of Public Mental Health, 2(3), 35-44. doi:10.1108/17465729200000020
7.
BerryH.RodgersB. (2003). Trust and distress in three generations of rural Australians. Australasian Psychiatry, 11(Suppl. 1), S131-S137. doi:10.1046/j.1038-5282.2003.02000
8.
BohlC. (2000). New urbanism and the city: Potential applications and implications for distressed inner-city neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 761-801.
9.
BrainB. (1998). From good neighbors to sustainable cities: Social science and the social agenda of the New Urbanism. Regional Science Review, 28, 217-238. doi:10.1177/0160017605275161
10.
BrainD. (2005). “From Good Neighborhoods to Sustainable Cities: Social Science and the Social Agenda of the New Urbanism.”International Regional Science Review28(2): 217-238.
11.
BrownB. B.BurtonJ. R.SweaneyA. L. (1998). Neighbors, households and front porches. New urbanist community tool or mere nostalgia?Environment and Behavior, 30, 579-600. doi:10.1177/001391659803000501
12.
BrownB. B.CropperV. L. (2001). New urban and standard suburban subdivisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 402-419. doi:10.1080/01944360108976249
13.
BucknerJ. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 771-791. doi:10.1007/BF00930892
14.
BurtonL. (2015). Mental well-being and the influence of place. In BartonH.ThompsonS.GrantM. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of planning for health and well-being (pp. 150-161). London, England: Routledge.
15.
CabreraJ. F. (2013). New urbanism and selection bias in the formation of social capital?Housing Policy Debate, 23, 376-394. doi:10.1080/10511482.2013.766626
16.
CabreraJ. F.NajarianJ. C. (2013). Can new urbanism create diverse communities?Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33, 427-441. doi:10.1177/0739456X13500309
17.
CalthorpeP. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
18.
CattellV. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: The mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1501-1516. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00259-8
19.
ChavisD.WandersmanA. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55-81.
20.
ChiesuraA. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 129-138. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003
CozensP. M. (2008). New urbanism, crime and the suburbs: A review of the evidence. Urban Policy and Research, 26, 429-444. doi:10.1080/08111140802084759
DillJ. (2006). Evaluating a new urbanist neighborhood. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 59-78.
25.
DuanyA.Plater-ZyberkE.SpeckJ. (2000). Suburban Nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York, NY: North Point Press.
26.
EllisC. (2002). The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design, 7, 261-291. doi:10.1080/1357480022000039330
27.
EvansG. W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80, 536-555.
28.
FaganC.TrudeauD. (2014). Empowerment by design? Women’s use of new urbanist neighborhoods in suburbia. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34, 325-338. doi:10.1177/0739456x14539353
29.
FalconerR., et al. (2010). “Is practice aligned with the principles? Implementing New Urbanism in Perth, Western Australia.”Transport Policy17(5): 287-294.
30.
FordL. (2001). Alleys and urban form: Testing the tenets of new urbanism. Urban Geography, 22, 268-286. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.22.3.268
31.
FosterS.Giles-CortiB.KnuimanM. (2011). Creating safe walkable streetscapes: Does house design and upkeep discourage incivilities in suburban neighborhoods?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 79-88. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.005
32.
FosterS.HooperP.KnuimanM.BullF.Giles-CortiB. (2015). Are Liveable Neighborhoods safer neighborhoods? Testing the rhetoric on new urbanism and safety from crime in Perth, Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 150-157. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.013
33.
FowlerE. (1987). Street management and city design. Social Forces, 66, 376-377.
34.
FrancisJ.Giles-CortiB.WoodL.KnuimanM. (2012). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 401-409. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
35.
FrancisJ.Giles-CortiB.WoodL.KnuimanM. (2014). Neighborhood influences on mental health in master planned estates: A qualitative study of resident perspectives. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 25, 186-192. doi:10.1071/HE14036
36.
FrancisJ.WoodL. J.KnuimanM.Giles-CortiB. (2012). Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between public open space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1570-1577. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.032
37.
FrenchS.WoodL.FosterS.Giles-CortiB.FrankL.LearnihanV. (2013). Sense of community and its association with the neighborhood built environment. Environment and Behavior, 46, 677-697. doi:10.1177/0013916512469098
38.
FultonW. (1996). New urbanism: Hope or hype for American communities?Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
39.
FurukawaT. A.KesslerR. C.SladeT.AndrewsG. (2003). The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian national survey of mental health and well-being. Psychological Medicine, 33, 357-362.
40.
GableS. L.NezlekJ. B. (1998). Level and instability of day-to-day psychological wellbeing and risk for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 129-138.
41.
GardeA. M. (2004). New urbanism as sustainable growth? A supply side story and its implications for public policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 154-170. doi:10.1177/0739456x04266606
42.
Giles-CortiB.KnuimanM.TimperioA.Van NielK.PikoraT.BullF.. . . BulsaraM. (2008). Evaluation of the implementation of a state government community design policy aimed at increasing local walking: Design issues and baseline results from RESIDE, Perth Western Australia. Preventive Medicine, 46, 46-54. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.002
43.
GongY.PalmerS.GallacherJ.MarsdenT.FoneD. (2016). A systematic review of the relationship between objective measurements of the urban environment and psychological distress. Environment International, 96, 48-57. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.08.019
44.
GordonD.TammingaK. (2002). Large-scale traditional neighborhood development and pre-emptive ecosystem planning: The Markham experience 1989-2001. Journal of Urban Design, 7, 321-340. doi:10.1080/1357480022000039367
45.
GordonD.VipondS. (2005). Gross density and new urbanism: Comparing new urbanism and conventional suburbs in Markham, Ontario. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 41-56. doi:10.1080/01944360508976404
46.
GrantJ.PerrottK. (2009). Producing Diversity in a New Urbanism Community: Policy and Practice. The Town Planning Review, 80(3), 267-289. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27715103
47.
HajnaS.RossN. A.BrazeauA.-S.BélisleP.JosephL.DasguptaK. (2015). Associations between neighborhood walkability and daily steps in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 15, 1-8. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x
48.
HalpernD. (1995). Mental health and the built environment: More than bricks and mortar?London, England: Taylor & Francis.
49.
HartigT.MangM.EvansG. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26. doi:10.1177/0013916591231001
50.
HolahanC. J.MoosR. H.HolahanC. K.BrennanP. L. (1997). Social context, coping strategies, and depressive symptoms: An expanded model with cardiac patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 918-928.
51.
HooperP.Giles-CortiB.KnuimanM. (2014). Evaluating the implementation and active living impacts of a state government planning policy designed to create walkable neighborhoods in Perth, Western Australia. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(Suppl. 3), S5-S18. doi:10.4278/ajhp.130503-QUAN-226
52.
HooperP.KnuimanM.BullF.JonesE.Giles-CortiB. (2015a). Are we developing walkable suburbs through urban planning policy? Identifying the mix of design requirements to optimise walking outcomes from the “Liveable Neighborhoods” planning policy in Perth, Western Australia. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 63-74. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0225-1
53.
HooperP.KnuimanM.BullF.JonesE.Giles-CortiB. (2015b). The building blocks of a “Liveable Neighborhood”: Identifying the key performance indicators for walking of an operational planning policy in Perth, Western Australia. Health & Place, 36, 173-183. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.005
54.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.
55.
JohnsonJ.TalenE. (2008). Affordable housing in new urbanist communities: A survey of developers. Housing Policy Debate, 19, 583-613. doi:10.1080/10511482.2008.9521648
56.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182.
57.
KawachiI.BerkmanL. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 458-467. doi:10.1093/jurban/78.3.458
58.
KearneyA. R. (2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction: Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior, 38, 112-139. doi:10.1177/0013916505277607
59.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.ColpeL. J.HiripiE.MroczekD. K.NormandS. L.. . . ZaslavskyA. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959-976.
60.
KesslerR. C.BarkerP. R.ColpeL. J.EpsteinJ. F.GfroererJ. C.HiripiE.ZaslavskyA. M. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 184-189.
61.
KesslerR. C.GreenJ. G.GruberM. J.SampsonN. A.BrometE.CuitanM.. . . ZaslavskyA. M. (2010). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: Results from the WHO world mental health (WMH) survey initiative. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 19, 4-22.
62.
KimJ. (2000). Creating communities: Does the Kentlands live up to its goals? (The promise of New Urbanism). Places, 13, 48-55.
63.
KimJ.KaplanR. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behavior, 36, 313-340. doi:10.1177/0013916503260236
64.
KuoF. E.BacaicoaM.SullivanW. C. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28-59. doi:10.1177/0013916598301002
65.
LehrerU. A.MilgromR. (1996). New (sub)urbanism: Countersprawl or repackaging the product. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7, 49-64. doi:10.1080/10455759609358678
66.
LeydenK. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1546-1551.
67.
LundH. (2002). Pedestrian environments and sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 301-312. doi:10.1177/0739456x0202100307
68.
LundH. (2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 414-429. doi:10.1080/01944360308976328
69.
MacintyreS.MaciverS.SoomanA. (1993). Area, class and health: Should we be focusing on places or people?Journal of Social Policy, 22, 213-234. doi:10.1017/S0047279400019310
70.
McCormackG. R.ShiellA. (2011). In search of causality: A systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 125. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-125
71.
McMillanD. W.ChavisD. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23. doi:10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::aid-jcop2290140103>3.0.co;2-i
72.
NasarJ. L. (2003). Does neotraditional development build community?Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 58-68.
73.
NathanA.WoodL.Giles-CortiB. (2013). Selling new neighborhoods as good for walking: Issues for measuring self-selection. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 10, 5-9.
74.
OstirG. V.EschbachK.MarkidesK. S.GoodwinJ. S. (2003). Neighborhood composition and depressive symptoms among older Mexican Americans. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 987-992.
75.
PapasM. A.AlbergA. J.EwingR.HelzlsouerK. J.GaryT. L.KlassenA. C. (2007). The built environment and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29, 129-143. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxm009
76.
PendolaR.GenS. (2008). Does “main street” promote sense of community? A comparison of San Francisco neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 40, 545-574. doi:10.1177/0013916507301399
77.
PerkinsD.LongD. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: A multi-level analysis. In FisherA.SonnC.BishopB. (Ed.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications (pp. 391-318). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
78.
PlasJ. M.LewisS. E. (1996). Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 109-143.
79.
PrattL. A.DeyA. N.CohenA. J. (2007). Characteristics of adults with serious psychological distress as measured by the K6 scale: United States, 2001-04. Advance Data, 382, 1-18.
80.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American democracy. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
81.
PutnamR. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41-51.
82.
RodriguezD.KhattakA.EvensonK. (2006). Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? Comparing a new urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 43-54.
83.
RogersS.HalsteadJ.GardnerK.CarlsonC. (2011). Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6, 201-213.
84.
RoseR. (2000). How much does social capital add to individual health? A survey study of Russians. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1421-1435.
85.
SanderT. H. (2002). Social capital and new urbanism: Leading a civic horse to water?National Civic Review, 91, 213-234.
86.
SohmerR. R.LangR. E. (2000). From seaside to Southside: New urbanism’s quest to save the inner city. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 751-760.
87.
SouthworthM.OwensP. M. (1993). The evolving metropolis: Studies of community, neighborhood, and street form at the urban edge. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 271-287. doi:10.1080/01944369308975880
88.
StrangeC.FisherC.HowatP.WoodL. (2014a). Creating a village in modern suburbia: Parenthood and social capital. Urban Policy and Research, 33, 160-177. doi:10.1080/08111146.2014.969399
89.
StrangeC.FisherC.HowatP.WoodL. (2014b). The essence of being connected: The lived experience of mothers with young children in newer residential areas. Community, Work & Family, 17, 486-502. doi:10.1080/13668803.2014.935704
90.
StrangeC.FisherC.HowatP.WoodL. (2014c). Fostering supportive community connections through mothers’ groups and playgroups. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 2835-2846. doi:10.1111/jan.12435
91.
SuarezR. (1999). The old neighborhood: What we lost in the great suburban migration, 1966- 1999. New York, NY: The Free Press.
92.
SullivanW. C.ChangC.-Y. (2011). Mental health and the built environment. In DannenbergA. L.FrumkinH.JacksonR. J. (Eds.), Making healthy places: Designing and building for health, well-being, and sustainability (pp. 106-116). Washington, DC: Island Press.
93.
TalenE. (1999). Sense of community and neighborhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of New Urbanism. Urban Studies, 36, 1361-1379. doi:10.1080/0042098993033
94.
TalenE. (2002). The social goals of new urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, 13, 165-188. doi:10.1080/10511482.2002.9521438
95.
TalenE.KoschinskyJ. (2014). Compact, walkable, diverse neighborhoods: Assessing effects on residents. Housing Policy Debate, 24, 717-750. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.900102
96.
TrudeauD. (2013). A typology of new urbansim neighborhoods. Journal of Urbansim: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 6, 113-138.
97.
TrudeauD.KaplanJ. (2016). Is there diversity in the new urbanism? Analyzing the demographic characteristics of new urbanist neighborhoods in the United States. Urban Geography, 37, 458-482.
98.
TrudeauD.MalloyP. (2011). Suburbs in disguise? Examining the geographies of the new urbanism. Urban Geography, 32, 424-447.
99.
UlrichR.AddomsD. (1981). Psychological and recreational benefits of a residential park. Journal of Leisure Research, 13, 43-65.
100.
Van HolleV.DeforcheB.Van CauwenbergJ.GoubertL.MaesL.Van de WegheN.De BourdeaudhuijI. (2012). Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1-17. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-807
VilliersP. D. (1997). New urbanism. Australian Planner, 34, 30-34. doi:10.1080/07293682.1997.9657737
103.
Western Australian Planning Commission. (1997). Liveable Neighborhoods community design code: A Western Australian government sustainable cities initiative (Edition 1). Perth: Author.
104.
Western Australian Planning Commission. (2000). Liveable Neighborhoods: A Western Australian government sustainable cities initiative (Edition 2). Perth: Author.
105.
WhitefordH.BuckinghamW. J.HarrisM. G.BurgessP. M.PirkisJ. E.BarendregtJ. J.HallW. D. (2014). Estimating treatment rates for mental disorders in Australia. Australian Health Review, 38, 80-85.
106.
WolchJ. R.ByrneJ.NewellJ. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities: “just green enough.”Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234-244. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
107.
World Health Organization. (2004). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice: Summary report. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
