This study investigated whether a video of a natural landscape would be more effective for restoration, including attention restoration and recovery from stress, when perceived as live rather than recorded. In total, 60 participants undertook attention-expending and stress inducing tasks, before being randomly assigned to one of three conditions (perceived live video, recorded video, and control). Attention recovery was assessed using Digit Span Backwards (DSB) and the Necker Cube Pattern Control (NCPC) pre- and post-condition, while stress was measured via skin conductivity, heart rate, and heart rate variability. We found that only participants in the live group significantly improved on the NCPC, whereas stress recovery was similar for both perceived live and recorded groups. Our findings suggest that a perceived live stream of nature may allow for greater cognitive inhibition, an important aspect of learning, whereas both perceived live and recorded videos effectively reduced sympathetic stress responses.
AllenP.BennettK.HeritageB. (2014). SPSS statistics version 22: A practical guide (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Cengage.
2.
AlvarssonJ.WiensS.NilssonM. (2010). Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 1036-1046. doi:10.3390/ijerph7031036
3.
AndradeC.DevlinA. (2015). Stress reduction in the hospital room: Applying Ulrich’s theory of supportive design. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 125-134. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.001
4.
AnnerstedtM.JönssonP.WallergårdM.JohanssonG.KarlsonB.GrahnP.. . . WährborgP. (2013). Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest—Results from a pilot study. Physiology and Behavior, 118, 240-250. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.023
5.
AppletonJ. (1988). Prospects and refuges revisited. In NasaJ. (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 27-44). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ArnonS.ShapsaA.FormanL.RegevR.BauerS.LitmanovitzI.DolfinT. (2006). Live music is beneficial to preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. Birth, 33, 131-136. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00090.x
BaileyL. (1983). The effects of live music versus tape-recorded music on hospitalized cancer patients. Music Therapy, 3(1), 17-28. doi:10.1093/mt/3.1.17
10.
BeilK.HanesD. (2013). The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress—A pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 1250-1267. doi:10.3390/ijerph10041250
11.
BermanM.JonidesJ.KaplanS. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Association for Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
12.
BermanM.KrossE.KrpanK.AskrenM.BursonA.DeldinP.. . . JonidesJ. (2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140, 300-305. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012
13.
BertoR. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249-259. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
14.
BeuteF.de KortY. (2014). Salutogenic effects of the environment: Review of health protective effects of nature and daylight. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6(1), 67-95. doi:10.1111/aphw.12019
15.
BrownD.BartonJ.GladwellV. (2013). Viewing nature scenes positively affects recovery of autonomic function following acute-mental stress. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 5562-5569. doi:10.1021/es305019p
16.
CerwénG.PedersenE.PálsdóttirA. (2016). The role of soundscape in nature-based rehabilitation: A patient perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13, 1229. doi:10.3390/ijerph13121229
17.
CimprichB. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16(2), 83-92. doi:10.1097/00002820-199304000-00001
18.
CritchleyH. (2002). Electrodermal responses: What happens in the brain. The Neuroscientist, 8, 132-142. doi:10.1177/107385840200800209
19.
CroftR.GonsalvezC.GanderJ.LechemL.BarryR. (2004). Differential relations between heart rate and skin conductance, and public speaking anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 35, 259-271. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.04.012
20.
de KortY.MeijndersA.SponseleeA.IJsselsteijnW. (2006). What’s wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 309-320. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.001
21.
FolsteinM.FolsteinS. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: A practice method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
22.
FriedmanB.FreierN.KahnP.LinP.SodemanR. (2008). Office window of the future? Field-based analyses of a new use of a large display. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 452-465. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.12.005
23.
GambleK.HowardJ.HowardD. (2014). Not just scenery: Viewing nature pictures improves executive attention in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 513-530. doi:10.1080/0361073x.2014.956618
24.
GaterslebenB.AndrewsM. (2013). When walking in nature is not restorative—The role of prospect and refuge. Health & Place, 20, 91-101. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.001
25.
GladwellV.BrownD.BartonJ.TarvainenM. P. K.PrettyJ.SuddabyJ. M.SandercockG. (2012). The effects of views of nature on autonomic control. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112, 3379-3386. doi:10.1007/s00421-012-2318-8
26.
HagaA.HalinN.HolmgrenM.SörqvistP. (2016). Psychological restoration can depend on stimulus-source attribution: A challenge for the evolutionary account?Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1831. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01831
27.
HaleJ.HoeppnerJ.FiorelloC. (2002). Analyzing digit span components for assessment of attention processes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 128-143. doi:10.1177/073428290202000202
28.
HanK. (2010). An exploration of relationships among the responses to natural scenes: Scenic beauty, preference, and restoration. Environment and Behavior, 42, 243-270. doi:10.1177/0013916509333875
29.
HartigT.EvansG.JamnerL.DavisD.GärlingT. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
30.
HartigT.MitchellR.de VriesS.FrumkinH. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
31.
HolmesC.KnightsA.DeanC.HodkinsonS.HopkinsS. (2006). Keep music live: Music and the alleviation of apathy in dementia subjects. International Psychogeriatrics, 18, 623-630. doi:10.1017/s1041610206003887
32.
HulbertJ.AndersonM. (2008). The role of inhibition in learning. In BenjaminA.J. S.de BelleEtnyreB.PolkT. (Eds.), Human learning: Biology, brain, and neuroscience (Vol. 139, pp. 7-20). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
33.
IsraelE.BeimanI. (1977). Live versus recorded relaxation training: A controlled investigation. Behavior Therapy, 8, 251-254. doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(77)80274-8
34.
JiangB.ChangC.SullivanW. (2014). A dose of nature: Tree cover, stress reduction, and gender differences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 26-36. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.005
35.
JiangB.LiD.LarsenL.SullivanW. (2016). A dose-response curve describing the relationship between urban tree cover density and self-reported stress recovery. Environment and Behavior, 48(4), 607-629. doi:10.1177/0013916514552321
36.
KahnP.FriedmanB.GillB.HagmanJ.SeversonR.FreierN.. . . StolyarA. (2008). A plasma display window?—The shifting baseline problem in a technologically mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 192-199. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.008
37.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
39.
KjellgrenA.BuhrkallH. (2010). A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 464-472. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.011
LaumannK.GarlingT.StormarkK. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 125-134. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00110-x
42.
LeeK.WilliamsK.SargentL.WilliamsN.JohnsonK. (2015). 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 182-189. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003
43.
LiD.SullivanW. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149-158. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015
44.
LibbyW.LaceyB.LaceyJ. (1973). Pupillary and cardiac activity during visual attention. Psychophysiology, 10, 270-294. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00526.x
45.
LohrV.Pearson-MimsC. (2006). Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environment and Behavior, 38, 667-688. doi:10.1177/0013916506287355
46.
LykkenD.VenablesP. (1971). Direct measurement of skin conductance: A proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology, 8, 656-672. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1971.tb00501.x
47.
MalikM.BiggerJ.CammA.KleigerR. A. M.MossA.SchwartzP. (1996). Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. European Heart Journal, 17, 354-381. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868
48.
MooreT.ZirnsakM. (2017). Neural mechanisms or selective visual attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 47-72. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033400
49.
OhlyH.WhilteM.WheelerB.BethelA. U.NikolaouV.GarsideR. (2016). Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicological and Environmental Health, 19, 305-343. doi:10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155
50.
OriansG. (1980). Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior. In LockardJ. (Ed.), The evolution of human social behavior (pp. 49-63). New York, NY: Elsevier.
51.
OttossonJ.GrahnP. (2005). A comparison of leisure time spent in a garden with leisure time spent indoors: On measures of restoration in residents in geriatric care. Landscape Research, 30(1), 23-55. doi:10.1080/0142639042000324758
52.
PaulG.TrimbleR. (1970). Recorded vs. “live” relaxation training and hypnotic suggestion: Comparative effectiveness for reducing physiological arousal and inhibiting stress response. Behavioral Therapy, 1, 285-302. doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(70)80108-3
53.
PeltolaM. (2012). Role of editing of R-R intervals in the analysis of heart rate variability. Frontiers in Physiology, 3, 148. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00148
54.
PilottiM.KleinE.GolemD.PiepenbrinkE.KaplanK. (2015). Is viewing a nature video after work restorative? Effects on blood pressure, task performance, and long-term memory. Environment and Behavior, 47, 947-969. doi:10.1177/0013916514533187
55.
RatcliffeE.GaterslebenB.SowdenP. (2013). Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 221-228. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.004
56.
RogersonM.BartonJ. (2015). Effects of the visual exercise environments on cognitive directed attention, energy expenditure, and perceived exertion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7321-7336. doi:10.3390/ijerph120707321
57.
SchutteN.BhullarN.StilinovićE.RichardsonK. (2017). The impact of virtual environments on restorativeness and affect. Ecopsychology, 9, 1-7. doi:10.1089/eco.2016.0042
58.
ShepleyM.WatsonA.PittsF.GarrityA.SpelmanE.FronsmanA.KelkarJ. (2017). Mental and behavioral health settings: Importance & effectiveness of environmental qualities & features as perceived by staff. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 50, 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.01.005
59.
SnellT.SimmondsJ.GreenwayA. (2015). Ecopsychology and evolutionary psychology: Implications and limitations of habitat selection theory. Ecopsychology, 7(2), 96-103. doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0053
60.
TarvainenM.Ranta-ahoP.KarjalainenP. (2002). An advanced detrending method with application to HRV analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49, 172-175. doi:10.1109/10.979357
61.
TaylorA.KuoF. (2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12, 402-409. doi:10.1177/1087054708323000
62.
TennessenC.CimprichB. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77-85. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0
63.
ThayerJ.ÅhsF.FredricksonM.SollersJ.WagerT. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 747-756. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009
64.
ThompsonC.RoeJ.AspinallP.MitchellR.ClowA.MillerD. (2012). More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105, 221-229. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
65.
TremayneP.BarryR. (2001). Elite pistol shooters: Physiological patterning of best vs. worst shots. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41(1), 19-29. doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00175-6
66.
UlrichR. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. (Eds.), Human behavior and environment (Vol. 6, pp. 85-125). New York, NY: Plenum.
67.
UlrichR.SimonsR.LositoB.FioritoE.MilesM.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 210-230. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7
ValtchanovD.BartonK.EllardC. (2010). Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 503-512. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0308
71.
ValtchanovD.EllardC. (2010). Physiological and affective responses to immersion in virtual reality: Effects of nature and urban settings. Journal of Cybertherapy & Rehabilitation, 3, 359-373.
72.
WheelerB. (1985). Relationship of personal characteristics to mood and enjoyment after hearing live and recorded music and to musical taste. Psychology of Music, 13(2), 81-92. doi:10.1177/0305735685132002
73.
WhiteM.SmithA.HumphreysK.PahlS.SnellingD.DepledgeM. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 482-493. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004
