Cohort replacement is one widely implicated, but seldom studied, mechanism of long-term change in public opinion toward environmental protection. A key difficulty in extant research has been empirically distinguishing cohort effects from those of age. Applying recent methodological advances in age–period–cohort models, we examine the disaggregated effects of age, time period, and birth cohort on changes in Americans’ support of federal spending for environmental protection between 1973 and 2016. Results suggest that cohort replacement provides little explanatory power. Instead, we find large age effects, with the young more likely to be pro-environmental in their views, and substantial changes across time periods (but not steady rising support). These results suggest that there is no inexorable march toward greater environmentalism as younger cohorts with greater environmental awareness replace older ones, and highlight the relative lack of explicit theorizing about the relationship between age and the environment.
AlwinD. F.McCammonR. J. (2007). Rethinking generations. Research in Human Development, 4, 219-237. doi:10.1080/15427600701663072
2.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, 5th edition. Lenexa, KS: Author.
3.
BrulleR.TurnerL.CarmichaelJ.JenkinsJ. (2007). Measuring social movement organization populations. Mobilization, 12, 255-270. doi:10.17813/maiq.12.3.j08421508773764m
4.
ButtelF. H. (1979). Age and environmental concern: A multivariate analysis. Youth and Society, 10, 237-256. doi:10.1177/0044118x7901000302
5.
ButtelF. H. (1987). New directions in environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 465-488. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.13.1.465
6.
ButtelF. M.FlinnW. L. (1978). The politics of environmental concern: The impacts of party identification and political ideology on environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 10, 17-36. doi:10.1177/0013916578101002
7.
CaldwellL. K. (1963). Environment: A new focus for public policy?Public Administration Review, 23, 132-139. doi:10.2307/973837
8.
CaradonnaJ. L. (2018). Routledge Handbook of the History of Sustainability. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CattonW. R.DunlapR. J. (1980). A new ecological paradigm for post-exhuberant sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 15-47. doi:10.1177/000276428002400103
10.
CarlisleJ. E.ClarkA. K. (2017). Green for god: Religion and environmentalism by cohort and time. Environment and Behavior, 50, 213-241. doi:10.1177/0013916517693356
DanielsD. P.KrosnickJ. A.TichyM. P.TompsonT. (2013). Public opinion on environmental policy in the United States. In KamienieckiS.KraftM. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 461-486). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
DanigelisN. L.HardyM.CutlerS. J. (2007). Population aging, intracohort aging, and sociopolitical attitudes. American Sociological Review, 72, 812-830. doi:10.1177/000312240707200508
14.
DavisJ. A. (2004). Did growing up in the 1960s leave a permanent mark on attitudes and values? Evidence from the General Social Survey. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 161-183. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh010
15.
DavisK. (1940). The sociology of parent-youth conflict. American Sociological Review, 5, 523-535. doi:10.2307/2084427
16.
DiamantopoulosA.SchlegelmilchB. B.SinkovicsR. R.BohlenG. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465-480. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7
17.
DietzT. A.SternP. C.GuagnanoG. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471. doi:10.1177/001391659803000402
18.
DownsA. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The “issue-attention cycle.”The Public Interest, 28, 38-50.
19.
DunlapR. E. (1975). The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7, 428-454. doi:10.1177/001391657500700402
20.
DunlapR. E. (1992). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues:1965-1990. In DunlapR. E.MertigA. G. (Eds.), American environmentalism: The U.S. environmental movement, 1970-1990 (pp. 89-116). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
21.
DunlapR. E. (2002, September/October). An enduring concern: Light stays green for environmental protection. Public Perspectives, pp. 10-14.
22.
DunlapR. E.McCrightA. M. (2008). A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment, 50, 26-35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35
23.
DunlapT. R. (1999). Nature and the English diaspora: Environment and history in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ElderG. H.Jr.JohnsonM. K.CrosnoeR. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In ShanahanM. J.MortimerM.JeylanJ. T.JohnsonM. K. (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3-19). Boston, MA: Springer.
25.
ErskineH. (1972). The polls: Pollution and its costs. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 120-135. doi:10.1086/267984
26.
GlennN. D. (2005). Cohort analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
GuberD. L. (2003). The grassroots of a green revolution: Polling America on the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
GuberD. L. (2013). A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 93-115. doi:10.1177/0002764212463361
29.
HamiltonL. C. (2011). Education, politics, and opinions about climate change. Climate Change, 104, 231-42. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
30.
HaysS. P. (1987). Beauty, health, and permanence: Environmental politics in the United States, 1955-1985. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HonnoldJ. A. (1984). Age and environmental concern some specification of effects. The Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 4-9. doi:10.1080/00958964.1984.9942695
32.
HoxJ. J.KreftI. G. G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 283-299. doi:10.1177/0049124194022003001
33.
HungerfordH. R.VolkT. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 8-21. doi:10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
34.
InglehartR. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
JohnsonE. W. (2008). Social movement size, organizational diversity and the making of federal law. Social Forces, 86, 967-993. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0006
36.
JohnsonE. W.FrickelS. (2011). Ecological threat and the founding of U.S. national environmental movement organizations, 1962-1998. Social Problems, 58, 305-329. doi:10.1525/sp.2011.58.3.305
37.
JohnsonE. W.SchwadelP. (2019). Political polarization and long-term change in public support for environmental spending. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/sf/soy124
38.
JonesR. E.DunlapR. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time. Rural Sociology, 57, 28-47. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x
39.
KanagyC. L.HumphreyC. R.FirebaughG. (1994). Surging environmentalism: Changing public opinion or changing publics?Social Science Quarterly, 75, 804-819.
40.
KlinebergS.McKeeverM.RothenbachB. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 734-753.
41.
LowryD. (2009). Age, the life course, and environmental justice. Environmental Justice, 2, 109-116. doi:10.1089/env.2009.0002
42.
McCormickJ. (1989). Reclaiming paradise: The global environmental movement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x/full
44.
McCrightA. M.XiaoC.DunlapR. E. (2014). Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974-2012. Social Science Research, 48, 251-260. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.008
45.
MohaiP.TwightB. W. (1987). Age and environmentalism: An elaboration of the Buttel model using national survey evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 68, 798-815.
46.
NaisbettJ. (1982). Megatrends. New York, NY: Warner Books.
47.
PampelF. C.HunterL. M. (2012). Cohort change, diffusion, and support for environmental spending in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 420-448. doi:10.1086/666506
48.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
49.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
ReitherE. N.MastersR. K.YangC.PowersD. A.ZhengH.LandK. C. (2015). Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?Social Science & Medicine, 128, 356-365. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011
51.
RomeA. (2013). The genius of Earth Day. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
52.
RoofW. C. (1993). A generation of seekers: The spiritual journeys of the baby boom generation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
53.
RyderN. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843-861. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8536-3_2
54.
SaleK. (1993). The green revolution: The American environmental movement, 1962-1992. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
55.
SchwadelP. (2010). Period and cohort effects on religious non-affiliation and religious disaffiliation: A research note. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 311-319. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01511.x
56.
SchwadelP.StoutM. (2012). Age, period, and cohort effects on social capital. Social Forces, 91, 233-252. doi:10.1093/sf/sos062
57.
SmithT. W.DavernM.FreeseJ.HoutM. (2017). General social surveys, 1972-2016 cumulative codebook. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
58.
StraussW.HoweN. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York, NY: William Morrow and Company.
59.
Van LiereK. D.DunlapR. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197. doi:10.1086/268583
60.
WebberD. J. (2008). Earth Day and its precursors: Continuity and change in the evolution of midtwentieth-century U.S. environmental policy. Review of Policy Research, 25, 313-332. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00334.x/full
61.
Wray-LakeL.FlanaganC. A.OsgoodW. D. (2010). Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environment and Behavior, 42, 61-85. doi:10.1177/0013916509335163
62.
WuthnowR. (1976). The consciousness reformation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
YangY. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1974 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73, 204-226. doi:10.1177/000312240807300202
64.
YangY.LandK. C. (2013). Age-period-cohort analysis: New models, methods, and empirical applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
