This study investigated the mediating role of neighborhood satisfaction and use of outdoor spaces in the effects of the physical environment on mental well-being. Four planning/design-related aspects of the environment were examined: perceived proximity of home to green/social spaces, open lawn with trees, and building-dominated spaces as well as perceived barriers to neighborhood use. A random sample of 434 Chicago residents participated in a photo survey. The results of linear regression modeling and mediation analyses support the hypothesis that satisfaction with quality of public space and frequency of use of green/social spaces have a significant mediating role in the relationship between nearby environmental attributes and mental well-being. Perceived barriers were also found to have both direct and indirect effects on mental well-being. Recognition of the differential roles played by environmental attributes, neighborhood satisfaction, and use patterns can help guide planners/designers to create outdoor spaces that enhance urban residents’ mental well-being.
BallK.BaumanA.LeslieE.OwenN. (2001). Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Preventive Medicine, 33, 434-440. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0912
2.
BartonH. (2009). Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Policy, 26(Suppl.), S115-S123. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.008
3.
BartonJ.PrettyJ. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 3947-3955. doi:10.1021/es903183r
4.
BermanM. G.JonidesJ.KaplanS. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207-1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x
5.
BratmanG. N.HamiltonJ. P.DailyG. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. In OstfeldR. S.SchlesingerW. H. (Eds.), Year in ecology and conservation biology (Vol. 1249, pp. 118-136). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
CimprichB.VisovattiM.RonisD. L. (2011). The Attentional Function Index—A self-report cognitive measure. Psycho-Oncology, 20, 194-202. doi:10.1002/pon.1729
7.
ColeyR. L.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29, 468-494.
8.
CookC. C. (1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20, 115-149. doi:10.1177/0013916588202001
9.
CrowT.BrownT.De YoungR. (2006). The Riverside and Berwyn experience: Contrasts in landscape structure, perceptions of the urban landscape, and their effects on people. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 282-299. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.002
10.
EllisC. D.LeeS. W.KweonB. S. (2006). Retail land use, neighborhood satisfaction and the urban forest: An investigation into the moderating and mediating effects of trees and shrubs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74, 70-78. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.004
11.
FernandezR. M.KulikJ. C. (1981). A multilevel model of life satisfaction: Effects of individual characteristics and neighborhood composition. American Sociological Review, 46, 840-850. doi:10.2307/2095082
12.
FrumkinH. (2003). Healthy places: Exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1451-1456.
13.
GalsterG. C.HesserG. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13, 735-758. doi:10.1177/0013916581136006
14.
Giles-CortiB.BroomhallM. H.KnuimanM.CollinsC.DouglasK.NgK.. . . DonovanR. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2, Suppl. 2), 169-176. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
15.
GrahnP.StigsdotterU. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2, 1-18.
16.
GruberK. J.SheltonG. G. (1987). Assessment of neighborhood satisfaction by residents of three housing types. Social Indicators Research, 19, 303-315. doi:10.1007/bf00300363
17.
HadaviS. (2015). Nearby nature and mental wellbeing: A designer’s perspective (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
18.
HadaviS.KaplanR. (2016). Neighborhood satisfaction and use patterns in urban public outdoor spaces: Multidimensionality and two-way relationships. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 19, 110-122. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.05.012
19.
HartigT.StaatsH. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 215-226. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.007
20.
HumpelN.MarshallA.LeslieE.BaumanA.OwenN. (2004). Changes in neighborhood walking are related to changes in perceptions of environmental attributes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 60-67. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2701_8
21.
HumpelN.OwenN.IversonD.LeslieE.BaumanA. (2004). Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 119-125. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.005
22.
HurM.Morrow-JonesH. (2008). Factors that influence residents’ satisfaction with neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 40, 619-635. doi:10.1177/0013916507307483
23.
HurM.NasarJ. L. (2014). Physical upkeep, perceived upkeep, fear of crime and neighborhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 186-194. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.001
24.
HurM.NasarJ. L.ChunB. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 52-59.
25.
KaplanR. (1984). Impact of urban nature: A theoretical analysis. Urban Ecology, 8, 189-197. doi:10.1016/0304-4009(84)90034-2
26.
KaplanR. (1985). The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning, 12, 161-176. doi:10.1016/0304-3924(85)90058-9
27.
KaplanR. (2001). The nature of the view from home—Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33, 507-542. doi:10.1177/00139160121973115
28.
KaplanR.AustinM. E. (2004). Out in the country: Sprawl and the quest for nature nearby. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 235-243. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.09.006
29.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
31.
KaplanS. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 480-506.
32.
KaplanS.KaplanR. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York, NY: Praeger.
33.
KaplanS.KaplanR. (2003). Health, supportive environments, and the reasonable person model. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1484-1489.
34.
KweonB. S.EllisC. D.LeivaP. I.RogersG. O. (2010). Landscape components, land use, and neighborhood satisfaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 37, 500-517. doi:10.1068/b35059
35.
LeeB. A. (1981). The urban unease revisited: Perceptions of local safety and neighborhood satisfaction among metropolitan residents. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 611-629.
36.
LeeR. M.RobbinsS. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 232-241. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232
37.
LeeS. W.EllisC. D.KweonB. S.HongS. K. (2008). Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 60-70. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.013
38.
LeslieE.CerinE. (2008). Are perceptions of the local environment related to neighbourhood satisfaction and mental health in adults?Preventive Medicine, 47, 273-278. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.01.014
39.
LovejoyK.HandyS.MokhtarianP. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments: An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 37-48. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.010
40.
MaasJ.van DillenS. M. E.VerheijR. A.GroenewegenP. P. (2009). Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15, 586-595. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006
41.
MacintyreS.MacdonaldL.EllawayA. (2008). Lack of agreement between measured and self-reported distance from public green parks in Glasgow, Scotland. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 26. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-5-26
42.
MacKerronG.MouratoS. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23, 992-1000. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
43.
MatsuokaR. H.KaplanR. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 7-19. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
44.
MillerF. D.TsemberisS.MaliaG. P.GregaD. (1980). Neighborhood satisfaction among urban dwellers. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 101-117. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02038.x
45.
NasarJ. L.JonesK. M. (1997). Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior, 29, 291-323. doi:10.1177/001391659702900301
46.
NordhH.HartigT.HagerhallC. M.FryG. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8, 225-235. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
47.
OwenN.HumpelN.LeslieE.BaumanA.SallisJ. F. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking—Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 67-76. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.006
48.
ParkesA.KearnsA.AtkinsonR. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods?Urban Studies, 39, 2413-2438. doi:10.1080/0042098022000027031
49.
PeschardtK. K.StigsdotterU. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 26-39. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013
50.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879
51.
RigerS.LavrakasP. J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55-66. doi:10.1007/bf00896360
52.
RussellR.GuerryA. D.BalvaneraP.GouldR. K.BasurtoX.ChanK. M. A.. . . TamJ. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473-502. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838
53.
SarasonS. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. Oxford, UK: Jossey-Bass.
54.
ScopellitiM.GiulianiM. V. (2004). Choosing restorative environments across the lifespan: A matter of place experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 423-437. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.002
55.
ShackletonC. M.BlairA. (2013). Perceptions and use of public green space is influenced by its relative abundance in two small towns in South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 104-112. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.011
56.
SugiyamaT.LeslieE.Giles-CortiB.OwenN. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(5), e9. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.064287
57.
SugiyamaT.Ward ThompsonC.AlvesS. (2009). Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 3-21. doi:10.1177/0013916507311688
58.
SullivanW. C.KuoF. E.DePooterS. F. (2004). The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior, 36, 678-700.
59.
TinsleyH. E. A.TinsleyD. J.CroskeysC. E. (2002). Park usage, social milieu, and psychosocial benefits of park use reported by older urban park users from four ethnic groups. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 199-218.
60.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
61.
VemuriA. W.GroveJ. M.WilsonM. A.BurchW. R. (2011). A tale of two scales: Evaluating the relationship among life satisfaction, social capital, income, and the natural environment at individual and neighborhood levels in Metropolitan Baltimore. Environment and Behavior, 43, 3-25. doi:10.1177/0013916509338551
62.
Ward ThompsonC. (2013). Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 79-96. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.003
63.
Ward ThompsonC.AspinallP. A. (2011). Natural environments and their impact on activity, health, and quality of life. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 230-260. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01053.x
64.
Ward ThompsonC.RoeJ.AspinallP.MitchellR.ClowA.MillerD. (2012). More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105, 221-229. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015
65.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
66.
Wright WendelH. E.ZargerR. K.MihelcicJ. R. (2012). Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107, 272-282. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.003
67.
ZhangH.LinS. (2011). Affective appraisal of residents and visual elements in the neighborhood: A case study in an established suburban community. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 11-21. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
