Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-1
Effects of Funding Allocation for Safe Routes to School Programs on Active Commuting to School and Related Behavioral,Knowledge,and Psychosocial Outcomes
Few controlled evaluations of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) initiatives have been conducted. The Texas Childhood Obesity Prevention Policy Evaluation (T-COPPE) study included three conditions: schools awarded infrastructure (I) projects (n = 23), schools awarded noninfrastructure (NI) projects (n = 21), and matched comparison (C) schools (n = 34). Fourth-grade children completed tallies to determine transport to/from schools. Serial cross-sectional surveys were collected from students and parents at baseline (2009) and follow-up (2012). Data were analyzed using mixed linear regression and growth curve models. Morning percent active commuting to school (ACS) in I and NI schools were higher than C schools (p = .024, p = .013, respectively). Afternoon percent ACS in NI schools decreased more over time compared with C schools (p = .009). I and NI school students had higher ACS self-efficacy; similar results were noted for parents in I schools. Policies that provide cost-reimbursement funding for SRTS achieve modest short-term ACS outcomes, with few differences between types of funding allocations.
AtteberryH.DowdyD.OluyomiA.NicholsD.OryM. G.HoelscherD. M. (2016). A contextual look at safe routes to school implementation in Texas. Environment and Behavior, 48, 210-229.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BassettD. R.FitzhughE. C.HeathG. W.ErwinP. C.FrederickG. M.WolffD. L.. . . StoutA. B. (2013). Estimated energy expenditures for school-based policies and active living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 108-113.
5.
BoarnetM. G.AndersonC. L.DayK.McMillanT.AlfonzoM. (2005). Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: Urban form changes and children’s active transportation to school. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 134-140.
6.
BrownsonR. C.ChangJ. J.EylerA. A.AinsworthB. E.KirtlandK. A.SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F. (2004). Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: A comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 473-483.
7.
BuckleyA.LowryM. B.BrownH.BartonB. (2013). Evaluating safe routes to school events that designate days for walking and bicycling. Transport Policy, 30, 294-300.
8.
CerinE.SaelensB. E.SallisJ. F.FrankL. D. (2006). Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and development of a short form. Medicine & Science Sports & Exercise, 38, 1682-1691.
9.
ChaufanC.YehJ.FoxP. (2012). The Safe Routes to School program in California: An update. American Journal of Public Health, 102, e8-11.
10.
ChillónP.EvensonK. R.VaughnA.WardD. S. (2011). A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 1-17.
11.
ChriquiJ. F.TaberD. R.SlaterS. J.TurnerL.LowreyK. M.ChaloupkaF. J. (2012). The impact of state safe routes to school-related laws on active travel to school policies and practices in U.S. elementary schools. Health & Place, 18, 8-15.
12.
CradockA. L.FieldsB.BarrettJ. L.MellyS. (2012). Program practices and demographic factors associated with federal funding for the Safe Routes to School program in the United States. Health & Place, 18(1), 16-23.
13.
DavisonK. K.WerderJ. L.LawsonC. T. (2008). Children’s active commuting to school: Current knowledge and future directions. Preventing Chronic Disease, 5, 1-11.
14.
DeweeseR. S.YedidiaM. J.TullochD. L.Ohri-VachaspatiP. (2013). Neighborhood perceptions and active school commuting in low-income cities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45, 393-400.
15.
FaulknerG.StoneM.BuliungR.WongB.MitraR. (2013). School travel and children’s physical activity: A cross-sectional study examining the influence of distance. BMC Public Health, 13, Article 1166.
16.
HendersonS.TannerR.KlandermanN.MatteraA.MartinW. L.StewardJ. (2013). Safe Routes to School: A public health practice success story—Atlanta, 2008-2010. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 10, 141-142.
17.
HincksonE. A.GarrettN.DuncanS. (2011). Active commuting to school in New Zealand children (2004-2008): A quantitative analysis. Preventive Medicine, 52, 332-336.
18.
HoelscherD. M.DayR. S.KelderS. H.WardJ. L. (2003). Reproducibility and validity of the secondary level School-Based Nutrition Monitoring student questionnaire. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103, 186-194.
19.
HoelscherD. M.DowdyD. M.EvansA. E.MenendezT. E.NicholsD.WangS.. . . OryM. (Submitted). Evaluating differences in active commuting and related psychosocial factors based on Safe Routes to School (SRTS) funding allocation.
20.
HsuH.SaphoresJ. (2014). Impacts of parental gender and attitudes on children’s school travel mode and parental chauffeuring behavior: Results for California based on the 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation, 41, 543-565.
21.
HubsmithD.MennessonM. (2014). Transportation for the twenty-first century: Designing healthy communities and active lifestyles with Safe Routes to School. National Civic Review, 103, 40-42.
22.
Institute of Medicine. (2012). Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: Solving the weight of the nation (The National Academies). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23.
LaroucheR.ChaputJ. P.LeducG.BoyerC.BelangerP.LeBlancA. G.. . . TremblayM. S. (2014). A cross-sectional examination of socio-demographic and school-level correlates of children’s school travel mode in Ottawa, Canada. BMC Public Health, 14, Article 497.
24.
LuW.McKyerE. L. J.LeeC.OryM. G.GoodsonP.WangS. (2015). Children’s active commuting to school: An interplay of social economic disadvantage, and environmental characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12, 1-14.
25.
MammenG.StoneM. R.FaulknerG.RamanathanS.BuliungR.O’BrienC.KennedyJ. (2014). Active school travel: An evaluation of the Canadian school travel planning intervention. Preventive Medicine, 60, 55-59.
26.
McDonaldN. C.DeakinE.AalborgA. E. (2010). Influence of the social environment on children’s school travel. Preventive Medicine, 50(Suppl. 1), S65-S68.
27.
McDonaldN. C.YangY.AbbottS. M.BullockA. N. (2013). Impact of the Safe Routes to School program on walking and biking: Eugene, Oregon study. Transport Policy, 29, 243-248.
28.
McLeroyK. R.BibeauD.StecklerA.GlanzK. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 351-377.
29.
MendozaJ. A.WatsonK.BaranowskiT.NicklasT. A.UscangaD. K.HanflingM. J. (2010). Validity of instruments to assess students’ travel and pedestrian safety. BMC Public Health, 10, Article 257.
30.
MendozaJ. A.WatsonK.BaranowskiT.NicklasT. A.UscangaD. K.NguyenN.HanflingM. J. (2010). Ethnic minority children’s active commuting to school and association with physical activity and pedestrian safety behaviors. Journal of Applied Research on Children, 1, 1-23.
31.
MuennigP. A.EpsteinM.LiG.DiMaggioC. (2014). The cost-effectiveness of New York City’s Safe Routes to School program. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 1294-1299.
PenkiloM.GeorgeG. C.HoelscherD. M. (2008). Reproducibility of the School-Based Nutrition Monitoring questionnaire among fourth-grade students in Texas. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40, 20-27.
34.
PerryC. L.HoelscherD. M.KohlH. W.III. (2015). Research contributions on childhood obesity from a public-private partnership. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(Suppl. 1), 1-7.
35.
RothmanL.ToT.BuliungR.MacarthurC.HowardA. (2014). Influence of social and built environment features on children walking to school: An observational study. Preventive Medicine, 60, 10-15.
36.
SaelensB. E.GlanzK. (2009). Work group I: Measures of the food and physical activity environment: Instruments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, S166-S170.
37.
SAFETEA-LU. (2005). Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, Pub. L. No. 109–59, §1404.
38.
SallisJ. F.TaylorW. C.DowdaM.FreedsonP. S.PateR. R. (2002). Correlates of vigorous physical activity for children in Grades 1 through 12: Comparing parent-reported and objectively measured physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 14, 30-44.
39.
SirardJ. R.AlhassanS.SpencerT. R.RobinsonT. N. (2008). Changes in physical activity from walking to school. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40, 324-326.
40.
StauntonC. E.HubsmithD.KallinsW. (2003). Promoting safe walking and biking to school: The Marin County success story. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1431-1434.
41.
StewartO.MoudonA. V.ClaybrookeC. (2014). Multistate evaluation of Safe Routes to School programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 28(Suppl. 3), S89-S96.
42.
Texas Department of Transportation, Safe Routes Texas, Safe Routes to School. (2013). Texas safe routes to school program evaluation. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation.
ThiagarajahK.FlyA. D.HoelscherD. M.BaiY.LoK.LeoneA.ShertzerJ. A. (2008). Validating the food behavior questions from the elementary school SPAN questionnaire. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40, 305-310.
47.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2015). MAP-21: Moving ahead for progress in the 21st century (Federal Highway Administration). Retrieved from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/
48.
WardD. S.LinnanL.VaughnA.NeelonB.MartinS. L.FultonJ. E. (2007). Characteristics associated with US walk to school programs. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4, 1-10.
