We contribute to scholarly understanding of lawn fertilization behavior by formulating and testing models of fertilization and fertilization frequency that incorporate a wide range of human and structural influences. Specifically, we explore the impact of (a) structural/environmental aspects, (b) sociodemographics, and (c) attitudes and beliefs (informal norms, knowledge, environmental concerns, yard motivations, perceived ability regarding fertilization practices). We use survey data from a sample of 942 residents within the Minneapolis/Saint Paul, Minnesota metropolitan area. Our results indicate that fertilization is not driven by one overriding factor but by a combination of factors. Specifically, we show significant effects from a range of structural aspects (lot size, location, use of a professional lawn service), sociodemographics (home value), norms (perceived neighbor effects), knowledge (perceived positive/negative aspects of fertilization), and perceived ability. We also explore the urban/suburban divide and show higher fertilization stemming from suburban households.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
AjzenI. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
3.
AskewL.McGuirkP. (2004). Watering the suburbs: Distinction, conformity and the suburban garden. Australian Geographer, 35, 17-37.
4.
BandaranayakeW.QianY. L.PartonW. J.OjimaD. S.FollettR. F. (2003). Estimation of soil organic carbon changes in turfgrass systems using the CENTURY model. Agronomy Journal, 95, 558-563.
5.
BeardJ. B.GreenR. L. (1994). The role of turfgrasses in environmental protection and their benefits to humans. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23, 452-460.
6.
BlaineT. W.ClaytonS.RobbinsP.GrewalP. S. (2012). Homeowner attitudes and practices towards residential landscape management in Ohio, USA. Environmental Management, 50, 257-271.
7.
ButterfieldB. W. (2004). 2004 Environmental lawn and garden survey. South Burlington, VT: National Gardening Association.
8.
ByrneL. B.GrewalP. (2008). Introduction to ecological landscaping: A holistic description and framework to guide the study and management of urban landscape parcels. Cities and the Environment, 1(2), Article 3.
9.
CarpenterS. R.CaracoN. F.CorrellD. L.HowarthR. W.SharpleyA. N.SmithV. H. (1998). Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8, 559-568.
10.
CarricoA. R.FraserJ.BazuinJ. T. (2013). Green with envy: Psychological and social predictors of lawn fertilizer application. Environment & Behavior, 45, 427-454.
11.
ChowdhuryR. R.LarsonK.GroveM.PolskyC.CookE. (2011). A multi-scalar approach to theorizing socio-ecological dynamics of urban residential landscapes. Cities and the Environment, 4(1), Article 6.
12.
CookE. M.HallS. J.LarsonK. L. (2012). Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: A synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment. Urban Ecosystems, 15, 19-52.
13.
DahmusM. E.NelsonK. C. (2014). Yard stories: Examining residents’ conceptions of their yards as part of the urban ecosystem. Urban Ecosystems, 17(1), 173-194. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0306-3
14.
DunlapR. E.JonesR. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In DunlapR. R.MichelsonW. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482-524). Wesport, CT: Greenwood.
15.
FeaganR. B.RipmeesterM. (1999). Contesting natural(ized) lawns: A geography of private green space in the Niagara region. Urban Geography, 20, 617-634.
16.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17.
FissoreC.BakerL. A.HobbieS. E.KingJ. Y.McFaddenJ. P.NelsonK. C.JakobsdottirI. (2011). Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus fluxes in household ecosystems in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Minnesota urban region. Ecological Applications, 21, 619-639.
18.
GreenleeA. R.EllisT. M.BergR. L. (2004). Low-dose agrochemicals and lawn-care pesticides induce developmental toxicity in murine preimplantation embryos. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112, 703-709.
19.
HinesJ. M.HungerfordH. R.TomeraA. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1-8.
20.
JeneretteG. D.HarlanS. L.BrazelA. J.JonesN.LarsenL.StefanovW. L. (2007). Regional relationships between vegetation, surface temperature, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landscape Ecology, 22, 353-365.
21.
JenkinsV. S. (1994). The lawn: A history of American obsession. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
22.
LarsonK. L.CasagrandeD.HarlanS. L.YabikuS. T. (2009). Residents’ yard choices and rationales in a desert city: Social priorities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs. Environmental Management, 44, 921-937.
23.
LarsonK. L.CookE.StrawhackerC.HallS. J. (2010). The influence of diverse values, ecological structure, and geographic context on residents’ multifaceted landscaping decisions. Human Ecology, 38, 747-761.
24.
LarsonK. L.IbesD. C.WhiteD. D. (2011). Gendered perspectives about water risks and policy strategies: A tripartite conceptual approach. Environment & Behavior, 43, 415-438.
25.
LawN. L.BandL. E.GroveJ. M. (2004). Nitrogen input from residential lawn care practices in suburban watersheds in Baltimore County, MD. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 737-755.
MilesiC.RunningS. W.ElvidgeC. D.DietzJ. B.TuttleB. T.NemaniR. R. (2005). Mapping and modeling the biogeochemical cycling of turf grasses in the United States. Environmental Management, 36, 426-438.
28.
NassauerJ. I.WangZ.DayrellE. (2009). What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 282-292.
29.
NelsonK. C.DahmusM.WoodsideA. (2011). Our yard care choices in urban living survey. St. Paul: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.tchep.umn.edu/
30.
NelsonK. C.GrayzeckS.KingJ.HobbieS.BakerL.McFaddenJ. (2008). Our household choices in urban living survey. St. Paul: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.tchep.umn.edu/
31.
NielsonL.SmithC. L. (2005). Influences on residential yard care and water quality: Tualatin watershed, Oregon. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41, 93-106.
32.
OsmondD. L.HardyD. H. (2004). Characterization of turf practices in five North Carolina communities. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33, 565-575.
33.
OsmondD. L.PlattJ. L. (2000). Characterization of suburban nitrogen fertilizer and water use on residential turf in Cary, North Carolina. HortTechnology, 10, 320-325.
34.
RobbinsP.BirkenholtzT. (2003). Turfgrass revolution: Measuring the expansion of the American lawn. Land Use Policy, 20, 181-194.
35.
RobbinsP.PoldermanA.BirkenholtzT. (2001). Lawns and toxins: An ecology of the city. Cities, 18, 369-380.
36.
RobbinsP.SharpJ. (2003a). Producing and consuming chemicals: The moral economy of the American lawn. Economic Geography, 79, 425-451.
37.
RobbinsP.SharpJ. (2003b). The lawn-chemical economy and its discontents. Antipode, 35, 955-979.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
40.
TempletonS. R.YooS. J.ZilbermanD. (1999). An economic analysis of yard care and synthetic chemical use: The case of San Francisco. Environmental & Resource Economics, 14, 385-397.
41.
YabikuS. T.CasagrandeD. G.Farley-MetzgerE. (2008). Preferences for landscape choice in a southwestern desert city. Environment & Behavior, 40, 382-400.
42.
ZhouW.TroyA.GroveM. (2008). Modeling residential lawn fertilization practices: Integrating high resolution remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Environmental Management, 41, 742-752.
43.
ZhouW.TroyA.GroveJ. M.JenkinsJ. C. (2009). Can money buy green? Demographic and socioeconomic predictors of lawn-care expenditures and lawn greenness in urban residential areas. Society & Natural Resources, 22, 744-760.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
